Bibliometric analysis of publications by South African viticulture and oenology research centres

We analysed the production, impact factor of, and scientific collaboration involved in viticulture and oenology articles associated with South African research centres published in international journals during the period 1990–2009. The articles under scrutiny were obtained from the Science Citation Index database, accessed via the Web of Knowledge platform. The search strategy employed specific viticulture and oenology terms and was restricted to the field ‘topic’. The results showed that 406 articles were published during the review period, with the most number of publications being in the South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture (n = 34), American Journal of Enology and Viticulture (n = 16) and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (n = 16). The articles were published by 851 authors from 236 institutions. The collaboration rate was 3.7 authors per article, having grown over the two decades examined. The most productive institutions (i.e. those receiving a greater number of citations) were Stellenbosch University (219 published articles and 2592 citations) and the Agricultural Research Council (49 published articles and 454 citations), both from South Africa. Graphical representation of co-authorship networks identified 18 groups of authors and a single network of institutions whose core is Stellenbosch University. In conclusion, we have identified a significant growth in South African viticulture and oenology research in recent years, with a high degree of internationalisation and a constant level of domestic collaboration.

[1]  R. Ponds,et al.  The limits to internationalization of scientific research collaboration , 2009 .

[2]  Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent,et al.  [Coauthorship networks and institutional collaboration in Revista Española de Cardiología publications]. , 2007, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[3]  E. Garfield.  The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. , 2006, JAMA.

[4]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[5]  Swapan Kumar Patra,et al.  Bibliometric study of bioinformatics literature , 2006, Scientometrics.

[6]  Stuart Dillon,et al.  Authorship patterns in information systems , 1997, Scientometrics.

[7]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  How relevant are local scholarly journals in global science? A case study of South Africa , 2006 .

[8]  U. Damm,et al.  A protocol for molecular detection of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora in grapevine wood , 2005 .

[9]  Olle Persson,et al.  Studying research collaboration using co-authorships , 1996, Scientometrics.

[10]  M. Newman.  Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[12]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Coauthorship networks of invisible colleges and institutionalized communities , 1994, Scientometrics.

[13]  I. Mendes,et al.  The impact factor of scientific journals. , 2002, Revista latino-americana de enfermagem.

[14]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[15]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Global cooperation in research , 1998 .

[16]  Radhamany Sooryamoorthy,et al.  Collaboration and publication: How collaborative are scientists in South Africa? , 2009, Scientometrics.

[17]  George Hripcsak,et al.  Case Report: Using Social Network Analysis within a Department of Biomedical Informatics to Induce a Discussion of Academic Communities of Practice , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  Radhamany Sooryamoorthy,et al.  Scientific publications of engineers in South Africa, 1975–2005 , 2010, Scientometrics.

[19]  Anastassios Pouris,et al.  Scientometrics of a pandemic: HIV/AIDS research in South Africa and the World , 2011, Scientometrics.

[20]  Mark P. Carpenter,et al.  International Research Collaboration , 1979 .

[21]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Program for Large Network Analysis , 1999 .

[22]  W. Glänzel,et al.  Science for Wine: A Bibliometric Assessment of Wine and Grape Research for Wine-Producing and Consuming Countries , 2006, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[23]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Scientometrics: State-of-the-art , 2006, Scientometrics.

[24]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[25]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Scientific Collaborations at a Distance , 2001, Science.

[26]  Michael Kahn,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of South Africa's scientific outputs - some trends and implications , 2011 .

[27]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Scientific Collaboration Results in Higher Citation Rates of Published Articles , 2006, Pharmacotherapy.

[28]  Radhamany Sooryamoorthy,et al.  Medical research in South Africa: a scientometric analysis of trends, patterns, productivity and partnership , 2010, Scientometrics.

[29]  Lucia Cusmano,et al.  Catching-up trajectories in the wine sector: a comparative study of Chile, Italy and South Africa. , 2010 .

[30]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications , 1986, Scientometrics.

[31]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  R. Aleixandre-Benavent,et al.  Coauthorship networks and institutional collaboration patterns in reproductive biology. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[33]  Anastassios Pouris,et al.  A bibliometric study of bioinformatics research in South Africa , 2007, Scientometrics.

[34]  PourisAnthipi,et al.  Scientometrics of a pandemic , 2011 .

[35]  Julie Thompson Klein.  Interdisciplinary Needs: The Current Context , 1996, Libr. Trends.

[36]  W. Klein,et al.  Bibliometrics , 2005, Social work in health care.