The high seas (C’s) of music piracy in information systems : cost, convenience and choice

Systems and technologies used for unauthorised file sharing have received little attention in the Information Systems literature. This paper attempts to fill this gap by presenting a critical, qualitative study on the motivations for using unauthorised file sharing systems. Based on 30 interviews with music consumers, musicians, and the music industry, this paper reports on the decision of music consumers to ‘pirate or purchase’. This paper highlights file sharing from multiple perspectives of users, musicians, and representatives from the music recording industry. Three main themes emerged on the cost, convenience and choice as motivators for unauthorised file sharing.

[1]  Richard Atterer,et al.  Can filesharers be triggered by economic incentives? Results of an experiment , 2008, New Media Soc..

[2]  Jintae Lee,et al.  An end-user perspective on file-sharing systems , 2003, CACM.

[3]  Kallol Kumar Bagchi,et al.  Global software piracy , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[4]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  The Internet is changing the music industry , 2001, Commun. ACM.

[5]  G. Klimis,et al.  COPYRIGHT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP: CATALYST OR BARRIER? , 2009 .

[6]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Managing Digital Piracy: Pricing and Protection , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Liisa von Hellens,et al.  Insights from the Underground: using Ant to Understand Practices and Motivations for File Sharing in Online Communities , 2012, ECIS.

[8]  Steven McClung,et al.  Getting up on the download: college students' motivations for acquiring music via the web , 2008, New Media Soc..

[9]  Daniel Robey,et al.  An investigation of user-led system design: rational and political perspectives , 1984, CACM.

[10]  Fred von Lohmann.  Voluntary collective licensing for music file sharing , 2004, CACM.

[11]  Jenine P. Beekhuyzen,et al.  Underground Online Music Communities: Exploring Rules for Membership , 2011, Online Inf. Rev..

[12]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity , 2004 .

[13]  Ben Light,et al.  More Than Just Friends? Facebook, Disclosive Ethics and the Morality of Technology , 2008, ICIS.

[14]  Paul England,et al.  The Darknet and the Future of Content Distribution , 2003 .

[15]  Birgitte Andersen,et al.  The impact of music downloads and P2P file-sharing on the purchase of music in Canada , 2008 .

[16]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[17]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  The future of ideas - the fate of the commons in a connected world , 2002 .

[18]  J. Habermas.  The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[19]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  The emerging role of electronic marketplaces on the Internet , 1998, CACM.

[20]  Rahul Telang,et al.  DRAFT : Preliminary and Incomplete Comments Welcome Competing with Free : The Impact of Movie Broadcasts on DVD Sales and Internet Piracy , 2006 .

[21]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[22]  Keith Jackson,et al.  Computer ethics: Cautionary tales and ethical dilemmas in computing , 1990 .

[23]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  On risk, convenience, and Internet shopping behavior , 2000, CACM.

[24]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Is Out of Sight, Out of Mind? An Empirical Study of Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Groups , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Jenine Beekhuyzen,et al.  Reciprocity and Sharing in an Underground File Sharing Community , 2009 .

[26]  G. Prem Premkumar,et al.  Alternate distribution strategies for digital music , 2003, CACM.