Accelerated time-resolved three-dimensional MR velocity mapping of blood flow patterns in the aorta using SENSE and k-t BLAST.

PURPOSE To assess the feasibility and potential limitations of the acceleration techniques SENSE and k-t BLAST for time-resolved three-dimensional (3D) velocity mapping of aortic blood flow. Furthermore, to quantify differences in peak velocity versus heart phase curves. MATERIALS AND METHODS Time-resolved 3D blood flow patterns were investigated in eleven volunteers and two patients suffering from aortic diseases with accelerated PC-MR sequences either in combination with SENSE (R=2) or k-t BLAST (6-fold). Both sequences showed similar data acquisition times and hence acceleration efficiency. Flow-field streamlines were calculated and visualized using the GTFlow software tool in order to reconstruct 3D aortic blood flow patterns. Differences between the peak velocities from single-slice PC-MRI experiments using SENSE 2 and k-t BLAST 6 were calculated for the whole cardiac cycle and averaged for all volunteers. RESULTS Reconstruction of 3D flow patterns in volunteers revealed attenuations in blood flow dynamics for k-t BLAST 6 compared to SENSE 2 in terms of 3D streamlines showing fewer and less distinct vortices and reduction in peak velocity, which is caused by temporal blurring. Solely by time-resolved 3D MR velocity mapping in combination with SENSE detected pathologic blood flow patterns in patients with aortic diseases. For volunteers, we found a broadening and flattering of the peak velocity versus heart phase diagram between the two acceleration techniques, which is an evidence for the temporal blurring of the k-t BLAST approach. CONCLUSION We demonstrated the feasibility of SENSE and detected potential limitations of k-t BLAST when used for time-resolved 3D velocity mapping. The effects of higher k-t BLAST acceleration factors have to be considered for application in 3D velocity mapping.

[1]  K. Khanafer,et al.  Turbulence significantly increases pressure and fluid shear stress in an aortic aneurysm model under resting and exercise flow conditions. , 2007, Annals of vascular surgery.

[2]  Richard Frayne,et al.  Visualizing three‐dimensional flow with simulated streamlines and three‐dimensional phase‐contrast MR imaging , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  M. Alley,et al.  Time-Resolved 3-Dimensional Velocity Mapping in the Thoracic Aorta: Visualization of 3-Directional Blood Flow Patterns in Healthy Volunteers and Patients , 2004, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  R. Ohayon,et al.  Fluid-Structure Interaction: Applied Numerical Methods , 1995 .

[5]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  k‐t BLAST and k‐t SENSE: Dynamic MRI with high frame rate exploiting spatiotemporal correlations , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Maxim Zaitsev,et al.  Time-resolved, 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Flow Analysis at 3 T: Visualization of Normal and Pathological Aortic Vascular Hemodynamics , 2007, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Accelerated dynamic Fourier velocity encoding by exploiting velocity-spatio-temporal correlations , 2004, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[8]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[9]  J. Ekaterinaris,et al.  Flow Dynamics in Expansions Characterizing Abdominal Aorta Aneurysms , 2006, Annals of vascular surgery.

[10]  J. Lindholt,et al.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  M. Alley,et al.  Comparison of flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms and volunteers using four‐dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  J. Hennig,et al.  [Flow-sensitive in-vivo 4D MR imaging at 3T for the analysis of aortic hemodynamics and derived vessel wall parameters]. , 2007, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[13]  K. Scheffler,et al.  In vivo assessment and visualization of intracranial arterial hemodynamics with flow-sensitized 4D MR imaging at 3T. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  Sebastian Kozerke,et al.  Reduced Data Acquisition Methods in Cardiac Imaging , 2004, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[15]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  On the influence of training data quality in k‐t BLAST reconstruction , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Maxim Zaitsev,et al.  Visualization of iliac and proximal femoral artery hemodynamics using time‐resolved 3D phase contrast MRI at 3T , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  P R Hoskins,et al.  Fluid—structure interaction in axially symmetric models of abdominal aortic aneurysms , 2009, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[19]  R. Tubbs,et al.  Screening for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with aortoiliac atherosclerosis: a preliminary study. , 2008, Folia morphologica.

[20]  R. Fattori,et al.  Acquired diseases of the thoracic aorta: role of MRI and MRA , 2006, European Radiology.

[21]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Accelerating cine phase‐contrast flow measurements using k‐t BLAST and k‐t SENSE , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  C. M. Scotti,et al.  Wall stress and flow dynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms: finite element analysis vs. fluid–structure interaction , 2008, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[23]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[24]  M. Buonocore,et al.  4D magnetic resonance velocity mapping of blood flow patterns in the aorta in young vs. elderly normal subjects , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  Yannis Papaharilaou,et al.  A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  J. Hennig,et al.  Time‐resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T: Improved navigator‐gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  Christof Baltes,et al.  k‐t BLAST reconstruction from non‐Cartesian k‐t space sampling , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  W. Nitz,et al.  Quantification of Blood Flow in the Carotid Arteries: Comparison of Doppler Ultrasound and Three Different Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences , 2001, Investigative radiology.

[29]  Murat Aksoy,et al.  Time‐resolved 3D quantitative flow MRI of the major intracranial vessels: Initial experience and comparative evaluation at 1.5T and 3.0T in combination with parallel imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  Evelyn P Whitlock,et al.  Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Best-Evidence Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.