Assessment of polynomial correlated function expansion for high-fidelity structural reliability analysis

Abstract Accurate prediction of failure probability of a given structural system subjected to parametric uncertainty often leads to a computationally challenging process requiring considerable amount of time. To overcome this issue, it is advantageous to develop non-intrusive model, that approximates the system response and perform all subsequent operations on the developed model. This paper presents a novel non-intrusive algorithm, referred to as polynomial correlated function expansion (PCFE), for high-fidelity reliability analysis. The proposed method expresses the output in a hierarchical order of component functions which facilitate (i) expressing the component functions in term of extended bases, (ii) determination of actual responses at quasi-random sample points, (iii) determination of the unknown coefficients associated with the bases by employing homotopy algorithm and (iv) Monte Carlo simulation. PCFE decouples the stochastic computations and finite element (FE) computations, and consecutively the FE code can be treated as a black box, as in the case of a commercial software. Six numerical problems, involving explicit performance functions and real-life problems described by implicit limit-state functions, have been solved to illustrate the performance of the proposed approach. It is observed that PCFE outperforms the existing approaches.

[1]  B. N. Rao,et al.  Multicut‐High Dimensional Model Representation for Structural Reliability Bounds Estimation Under Mixed Uncertainties , 2012, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[2]  Maurice Lemaire,et al.  Assessing small failure probabilities by combined subset simulation and Support Vector Machines , 2011 .

[3]  K. B. Misra,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation for reliability evaluation of complex systems , 1978 .

[4]  Silvio Galanti,et al.  Low-Discrepancy Sequences , 1997 .

[5]  Souvik Chakraborty,et al.  Multivariate function approximations using the D-MORPH algorithm , 2015 .

[6]  P. Bjerager Probability Integration by Directional Simulation , 1988 .

[7]  H. Rabitz,et al.  D-MORPH regression: application to modeling with unknown parameters more than observation data , 2010 .

[8]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  R. Rackwitz Reliability analysis—a review and some perspectives , 2001 .

[10]  Y. Y. Chen,et al.  A Moving Kriging Interpolation Response Surface Method for Structural Reliability Analysis , 2013 .

[11]  Yaacob Ibrahim,et al.  Observations on applications of importance sampling in structural reliability analysis , 1991 .

[12]  J. Beck,et al.  A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations , 1999 .

[13]  I. Sobol Uniformly distributed sequences with an additional uniform property , 1976 .

[14]  I. Sobol,et al.  On the use of variance reducing multipliers in Monte Carlo computations of a global sensitivity index , 1999 .

[15]  Sondipon Adhikari,et al.  Reliability Analysis Using Parabolic Failure Surface Approximation , 2004 .

[16]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  First-order concepts in system reliability , 1982 .

[17]  N. Gayton,et al.  CQ2RS: a new statistical approach to the response surface method for reliability analysis , 2003 .

[18]  A. M. Prasad,et al.  Cut-HDMR-based fully equivalent operational model for analysis of unreinforced masonry structures , 2012 .

[19]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Multiple design points in first and second-order reliability , 1998 .

[20]  Lu Zhenzhou,et al.  Reliability Sensitivity Algorithm Based on Stratified Importance Sampling Method for Multiple Failure Modes Systems , 2010 .

[21]  B. Sudret,et al.  Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis , 2011, 1105.0562.

[22]  Paul Bratley,et al.  Algorithm 659: Implementing Sobol's quasirandom sequence generator , 1988, TOMS.

[23]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  General multi-dimensional probability integration by directional simulation , 1990 .

[24]  A. Meher Prasad,et al.  High‐dimensional model representation for structural reliability analysis , 2009 .

[25]  Sondipon Adhikari,et al.  Combined parametric-nonparametric uncertainty quantification using random matrix theory and polynomial chaos expansion , 2012 .

[26]  Sai Hung Cheung,et al.  Stochastic sampling using moving least squares response surface approximations , 2012 .

[27]  Subrata Chakraborty,et al.  Adaptive response surface based efficient Finite Element Model Updating , 2014 .

[28]  J. Beck,et al.  Estimation of Small Failure Probabilities in High Dimensions by Subset Simulation , 2001 .

[29]  J. Halton On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals , 1960 .

[30]  Herschel Rabitz,et al.  General formulation of HDMR component functions with independent and correlated variables , 2011, Journal of Mathematical Chemistry.

[31]  Jinsuo Nie,et al.  A new directional simulation method for system reliability. Part I: application of deterministic point sets , 2004 .

[32]  V. Dubourg Adaptive surrogate models for reliability analysis and reliability-based design optimization , 2011 .

[33]  A. S. Balu,et al.  Confidence Bounds on Design Variables Using High-Dimensional Model Representation–Based Inverse Reliability Analysis , 2013 .

[34]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of rock slope reliability , 1989 .

[35]  Henri P. Gavin,et al.  High-order limit state functions in the response surface method for structural reliability analysis , 2008 .

[36]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Bayesian post-processor and other enhancements of Subset Simulation for estimating failure probabilities in high dimensions , 2011 .

[37]  H. Faure Good permutations for extreme discrepancy , 1992 .

[38]  H. Rabitz,et al.  D-MORPH regression for modeling with fewer unknown parameters than observation data , 2012, Journal of Mathematical Chemistry.

[39]  Stelios D. Georgiou,et al.  A class of composite designs for response surface methodology , 2014, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[40]  Jian Li,et al.  Doubly weighted moving least squares and its application to structural reliability analysis , 2012 .

[41]  Souvik Chakraborty,et al.  Polynomial Correlated Function Expansion for Nonlinear Stochastic Dynamic Analysis , 2015 .

[42]  S. Adhikari,et al.  A reduced polynomial chaos expansion method for the stochastic finite element analysis , 2012 .

[43]  M. D. Stefano,et al.  Efficient algorithm for second-order reliability analysis , 1991 .

[44]  G. Schuëller,et al.  Chair of Engineering Mechanics Ifm-publication 2-374 a Critical Appraisal of Reliability Estimation Procedures for High Dimensions , 2022 .

[45]  S. Kounias,et al.  The exact D-optimal first order saturated design with 17 observations , 1982 .

[46]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 1993 .

[47]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Second-Order Reliability Approximations , 1987 .

[48]  Souvik Chakraborty,et al.  A semi-analytical framework for structural reliability analysis , 2015 .

[49]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[50]  Wei-Liang Jin,et al.  Improving importance sampling method in structural reliability , 1994 .

[51]  Szu Hui Ng,et al.  Bayesian Kriging Analysis and Design for Stochastic Simulations , 2012, TOMC.

[52]  L. Faravelli Response‐Surface Approach for Reliability Analysis , 1989 .

[53]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  New light on first- and second-order reliability methods , 1987 .

[54]  Jinsuo Nie,et al.  A new directional simulation method for system reliability. Part II: application of neural networks , 2004 .