Studies of Squeezing: Handedness, Responding Hand, Response Force, and Asymmetry of Readiness Potential

Eleven subjects squeezed an electronic dynamometer, at each of three force levels, with both their right and left hands. In right-handed subjects the premovement "readiness" potentials were larger over the hemisphere contralateral to the responding hand. Left-handed subjects show contralateral dominance when responding with the right hand but not when responding with the left hand. The data suggest that in the potentials studied there is a component associated with the preparation to perform a specific movement, rather than with generalized preparatory processes.

[1]  L. Gilden,et al.  Summated human EEG potentials with voluntary movement. , 1966, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Topography of the human motor potential. , 1968, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  D. Mcadam,et al.  Motivational determinants of the "contingent negative variation". , 1966, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  W. Walter,et al.  Contingent Negative Variation : An Electric Sign of Sensori-Motor Association and Expectancy in the Human Brain , 1964, Nature.

[5]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the contingent negative variation contingent on a motor response? , 1972, Psychophysiology.

[6]  J. Tecce Contingent negative variation (CNV) and psychological processes in man. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.