What are you doing? - enterprise microblogging as context building

With the advent of Twitter, microblogging has turned into a widely discussed phenomenon. Due to its perceived impact, many organisations have begun experimenting with the use of microblogging „behind the firewall‟, in order to support internal communication and group work. However, Enterprise Microblogging (EMB) is still in its infancy and not yet well understood. With this study we want to add to the rather limited body of knowledge a case study of Enterprise Microblogging in an academic setting. A multidisciplinary team of University researchers has adopted the platform Communote to collaborate and communicate. We conduct a genre analysis of the team‟s microblogging stream and find that EMB mainly serves as an effective medium for context building and meeting coordination in a project of otherwise loosely related individual activities. We compare our results with findings from two existing EMB cases, one of which has investigated the use of the same IT artefact in a different context. We find striking differences in usage patterns and show that EMB is highly dependent on the particular organisational context shared by the EMB users. Consequently, we conclude that appropriation of Enterprise Microblogging happens largely in accordance with organisational context characteristics.

[1]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[2]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams , 2010, CSCW '10.

[3]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  A few chirps about twitter , 2008, WOSN '08.

[4]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities , 2007, WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07.

[5]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations , 1994 .

[6]  Dirk Riehle,et al.  Modeling Microblogging Adoption in the Enterprise , 2009, AMCIS.

[7]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Genres of Digital Documents: Introduction to the Special Issue , 2005 .

[8]  J. Swales,et al.  Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution , 2001 .

[9]  Andreas Reckwitz Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[10]  Peter S. Fosl The Truth Is Not Out There , 1999 .

[11]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings , 1993 .

[12]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Project view IM: a tool for juggling multiple projects and teams , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[13]  Alexander Richter,et al.  Tweet Inside: Microblogging in a Corporate Context , 2010, Bled eConference.

[14]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Structuring of Genres in Electronic Communication: Reinforcement and Change of Social Interaction , 1999 .

[15]  Andy Seto I agree (with you). , 2011 .

[16]  P Tandon Wish You all the Best , 2012 .

[17]  Jens Dibbern,et al.  An Exploratory Study about Microblogging Acceptance at Work , 2010, AMCIS.

[18]  K. Riemer,et al.  Corporate Social Networking Sites – Modes of Use and Appropriation through Co-Evolution , 2009 .

[19]  Jun Zhang,et al.  A case study of micro-blogging in the enterprise: use, value, and related issues , 2010, CHI.

[20]  Stuart J. Barnes,et al.  Continuance usage intention in microblogging services: The case of twitter , 2009, ECIS.