Sex determination using the Probabilistic Sex Diagnosis (DSP: Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste) tool in a virtual environment.

The hip bone is one of the most reliable indicators of sex in the human body due to the fact it is the most dimorphic bone. Probabilistic Sex Diagnosis (DSP: Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste) developed by Murail et al., in 2005, is a sex determination method based on a worldwide hip bone metrical database. Sex is determined by comparing specific measurements taken from each specimen using sliding callipers and computing the probability of specimens being female or male. In forensic science it is sometimes not possible to sex a body due to corpse decay or injury. Skeletalization and dissection of a body is a laborious process and desecrates the body. There were two aims to this study. The first aim was to examine the accuracy of the DSP method in comparison with a current visual sexing method on sex determination. A further aim was to see if it was possible to virtually utilise the DSP method on both the hip bone and the pelvic girdle in order to utilise this method for forensic sciences. For the first part of the study, forty-nine dry hip bones of unknown sex were obtained from the Body Donation Programme of the Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB). A comparison was made between DSP analysis and visual sexing on dry bone by two researchers. CT scans of bones were then analysed to obtain three-dimensional (3D) virtual models and the method of DSP was analysed virtually by importing the models into a customised software programme called lhpFusionBox which was developed at ULB. The software enables DSP distances to be measured via virtually-palpated bony landmarks. There was found to be 100% agreement of sex between the manual and virtual DSP method. The second part of the study aimed to further validate the method by analysing thirty-nine supplementary pelvic girdles of known sex blind. There was found to be a 100% accuracy rate further demonstrating that the virtual DSP method is robust. Statistically significant differences were found in the identification of sex between researchers in the visual sexing method although both researchers identified the same sex in all cases in the manual and virtual DSP methods for both the hip bones and pelvic girdles.

[1]  Gary Hatch,et al.  Sex determination from os sacrum by postmortem CT. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[2]  S. Maclaughlin,et al.  The accuracy of sex identification in European skeletal remains using the phenice characters. , 1990, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  R. Fanelli,et al.  Conclusions and Future Perspectives , 2011 .

[4]  Selma Uysal,et al.  Estimation of sex by 3D CT measurements of the foramen magnum. , 2005, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  Daniel Rougé,et al.  Virtual and macroscopical studies of mummies--differences or complementarity? Report of a natural frozen Siberian mummy. , 2010, Forensic science international.

[6]  Giancarlo Di Vella,et al.  Metric characterization of the human coxal bone on a recent Italian sample and multivariate discriminant analysis to determine sex. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[7]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[8]  Ritesh G Menezes,et al.  Sex determination from measurements of the sternum and fourth rib using multislice computed tomography of the chest. , 2010, Forensic science international.

[9]  Hitoshi Biwasaka,et al.  Analyses of sexual dimorphism of reconstructed pelvic computed tomography images of contemporary Japanese using curvature of the greater sciatic notch, pubic arch and greater pelvis. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[10]  C. Baillif-Ducros,et al.  Approche méthodologique pour distinguer un ensemble lésionnel fiable de la pratique cavalière. Exemple du squelette de la tombe 11 du site de « La Tuilerie » à Saint-Dizier (Haute-Marne), vie siècle , 2012, Bulletins et mémoires de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris.

[11]  N. Lovell,et al.  Test of Phenice's technique for determining sex from the os pubis. , 1989, American journal of physical anthropology.

[12]  Liknur Ari,et al.  Morphometry of the greater sciatic notch on remains of male Byzantine skeletons from Nicea , 2005 .

[13]  E. Cunha,et al.  DSP: A tool for probabilistic sex diagnosis using worldwide variability in hip-bone measurements , 2005 .

[14]  Jean-Pol Beauthier,et al.  Traité de médecine légale , 2011 .

[15]  Hervé Rousseau,et al.  Ontogeny of Size and Shape Sexual Dimorphism in the Ilium: A Multislice Computed Tomography Study by Geometric Morphometry , 2013, Journal of forensic sciences.

[16]  Phillip L Walker,et al.  Greater sciatic notch morphology: sex, age, and population differences. , 2005, American journal of physical anthropology.

[17]  M. Rooze,et al.  Hand skin reconstruction from skeletal landmarks , 2007, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[18]  Eugénia Cunha,et al.  Forensic Anthropology and Medicine , 2006 .

[19]  M W Bidez,et al.  Measuring the human pelvis: a comparison of direct and radiographic techniques using a modern United States--based sample. , 1997, American journal of physical anthropology.

[20]  Jaroslav Bruzek,et al.  A New Approach to Sexual Diagnosis in Past Populations. Practical Adjustments from Van Vark's Procedure , 1999 .

[21]  Alfio Quarteroni,et al.  A vision and strategy for the virtual physiological human: 2012 update , 2013, Interface Focus.

[22]  Michael J. Thali,et al.  Estimation of sex and age of “virtual skeletons”–a feasibility study , 2009, European Radiology.

[23]  Jennifer M Vollner,et al.  A revised method of sexing the human innominate using Phenice's nonmetric traits and statistical methods. , 2012, American journal of physical anthropology.

[24]  Daniel Rougé,et al.  Virtual anthropology and forensic identification: report of one case. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[25]  C Ozdoba,et al.  Into the decomposed body-forensic digital autopsy using multislice-computed tomography. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[26]  Jaroslav Bruzek,et al.  A method for visual determination of sex, using the human hip bone. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[27]  D. Ferembach,et al.  Recommandations pour déterminer l'âge et le sexe sur le squelette , 1979 .

[28]  Valeria Bernal,et al.  Geometric morphometric approach to sex estimation of human pelvis. , 2009, Forensic science international.

[29]  S Van Sint Jan,et al.  Femur shape prediction by multiple regression based on quadric surface fitting. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  S. Jan.  Introducing Anatomical and Physiological Accuracy in Computerized Anthropometry for Increasing the Clinical Usefulness of Modeling Systems , 2005 .

[31]  Frank Ramsthaler,et al.  Digital forensic osteology: morphological sexing of skeletal remains using volume-rendered cranial CT scans. , 2010, Forensic science international.

[32]  Serge Van Sint Jan,et al.  Identifying the location of human skeletal landmarks: Why standardized definitions are necessary - A proposal , 2005 .

[33]  Soren Blau,et al.  The role of forensic anthropology in Disaster Victim Identification (DVI). , 2011, Forensic science international.

[34]  T W Phenice,et al.  A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis. , 1969, American journal of physical anthropology.

[35]  Summer J Decker,et al.  Virtual Determination of Sex: Metric and Nonmetric Traits of the Adult Pelvis from 3D Computed Tomography Models *,† , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[36]  D. Ubelaker,et al.  Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains , 1994 .

[37]  Michael J Thali,et al.  Digital forensic osteology--possibilities in cooperation with the Virtopsy project. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[38]  D. Ferembach,et al.  Recommendation for Age and Sex Diagnoses of Skeletons , 1980 .

[39]  C. A. King,et al.  Metric and comparative analysis of sexual dimorphism in the Thai femur. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[40]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[41]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Does human sexual dimorphism influence fracture frequency, types and distribution? , 2011 .

[42]  Hervé Rousseau,et al.  Human Coxal Bone Sexual Dimorphism and Multislice Computed Tomography: Geometric Morphometric Analysis of 65 Adults , 2012, Journal of forensic sciences.

[43]  A. Viera,et al.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. , 2005, Family medicine.

[44]  Michael J Thali,et al.  Charred body: virtual autopsy with multi-slice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.