The role of sensory adaptation in the retina.

Adaptation, a change in response to a sustained stimulus, is a widespread property of sensory systems, occurring at many stages, from the most peripheral energy-gathering structures to neural networks. Adaptation is also implemented at many levels of biological organization, from the molecule to the organ. Despite adaptation's diversity, it is fruitful to extract some unifying principles by considering well-characterized components of the insect visual system. A major function of adaptation is to increase the amount of sensory information an organism uses. The amount of information available to an organism is ultimately defined by its environment and its size. The amount of information collected depends upon the ways in which an organism samples and transduces signals. The amount of information that is used is further limited by internal losses during transmission and processing. Adaptation can increase information capture and reduce internal losses by minimizing the effects of physical and biophysical constraints. Optical adaptation mechanisms in compound eyes illustrate a common trade-off between energy (quantum catch) and acuity (sensitivity to changes in the distribution of energy). This trade-off can be carefully regulated to maximize the information gathered (i.e. the number of pictures an eye can reconstruct). Similar trade-offs can be performed neurally by area summation mechanisms. Light adaptation in photoreceptors introduces the roles played by cellular constraints in limiting the available information. Adaptation mechanisms prevent saturation and, by trading gain for temporal acuity, increase the rate of information uptake. By minimizing the constraint of nonlinear summation (imposed by membrane conductance mechanisms) a cell's sensitivity follows the Weber-Fechner law. Thus, a computationally advantageous transformation is generated in response to a cellular constraint. The synaptic transfer of signals from photoreceptors to second-order neurones emphasizes that the cellular constraints of nonlinearity, noise and dynamic range limit the transmission of information from cell to cell. Synaptic amplification is increased to reduce the effects of noise but this resurrects the constraint of dynamic range. Adaptation mechanisms, both confined to single synapses and distributed in networks, remove spatially and temporally redundant signal components to help accommodate more information within a single cell. The net effect is a computationally advantageous removal of the background signal. Again, the cellular constraints on information transfer have dictated a computationally advantageous operation.

[1]  S. Exner Die Physiologie der facettirten Augen von Krebsen und Insecten , 1891 .

[2]  C. H. Graham,et al.  Nerve impulses from single receptors in the eye , 1932 .

[3]  A. R. Martin,et al.  A further study of the statistical composition of the end‐plate potential , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[5]  Adrian Receptors and Sensory Perception , 1955, Nature.

[6]  W. Loewenstein THE GENERATION OF ELECTRIC ACTIVITY IN A NERVE ENDING * , 1959, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[7]  D. Jameson,et al.  Mach bands : quantitative studies on neural networks in the retina , 1966 .

[8]  K. Naka,et al.  S‐potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae) , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  W Reichardt,et al.  The insect eye as a model for analysis of uptake, transduction, and processing of optical data in the nervous system , 1969 .

[10]  H K Hartline,et al.  Visual receptors and retinal interaction. , 1969, Science.

[11]  D. Baylor,et al.  Electrical responses of single cones in the retina of the turtle , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  N. Franceschini,et al.  Pupil and Pseudopupil in the Compound Eye of Drosophila , 1972 .

[13]  F S Werblin,et al.  The control of sensitivity in the retina. , 1973, Scientific American.

[14]  S. Laughlin Neural integration in the first optic neuropile of dragonflies , 1973 .

[15]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  Reconstruction of the electrical responses of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  F. Werblin,et al.  Control of Retinal Sensitivity: I. Light and Dark Adaptation of Vertebrate Rods and Cones , 1974 .

[17]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  G. Horridge The Compound eye and vision of insects , 1975 .

[19]  S. R. Shaw,et al.  Retinal resistance barriers and electrical lateral inhibition , 1975, Nature.

[20]  Kuno Kirschfeld,et al.  The Resolution of Lens and Compound Eyes , 1976 .

[21]  Allan W. Snyder,et al.  Information capacity of eyes , 1977, Vision Research.

[22]  T. Furukawa,et al.  Adaptive rundown of excitatory post‐synaptic potentials at synapses between hair cells and eight nerve fibres in the goldfish. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  Doekele G. Stavenga,et al.  Pseudopupils of Compound Eyes , 1979 .

[24]  A. Snyder Physics of Vision in Compound Eyes , 1979 .

[25]  R. Normann,et al.  The effects of background illumination on the photoresponses of red and green cones. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  S. Laughlin A Simple Coding Procedure Enhances a Neuron's Information Capacity , 1981, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[27]  H. Barlow Critical limiting factors in the design of the eye and visual cortex , 1981 .

[28]  H B Barlow,et al.  The Ferrier lecture, 1980 , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[29]  H. Autrum Light and Dark Adaptation in Invertebrates , 1981 .

[30]  S B Laughlin,et al.  Single photon signals in fly photoreceptors and first order interneurones at behavioral threshold. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  Michael F. Land,et al.  Optics and Vision in Invertebrates , 1981 .

[32]  S. Laughlin Neural Principles in the Peripheral Visual Systems of Invertebrates , 1981 .

[33]  I A Meinertzhagen,et al.  An analysis of the number and composition of the synaptic populations formed by photoreceptors of the fly , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  D. Koshland,et al.  Amplification and adaptation in regulatory and sensory systems. , 1982, Science.

[35]  B W Knight,et al.  Adapting bump model for ventral photoreceptors of Limulus , 1982, The Journal of general physiology.

[36]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[37]  A. Snyder,et al.  Transduction as a limitation on compound eye function and design , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[38]  D. Koshland The bacterium as a model neuron , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[39]  K. Hausen The Lobula-Complex of the Fly: Structure, Function and Significance in Visual Behaviour , 1984 .

[40]  N. J. Strausfeld,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of the Blowfly’s Visual System , 1984 .

[41]  S. Shaw Early visual processing in insects. , 1984, The Journal of experimental biology.

[42]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Chapter 9 Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls , 1984 .

[43]  M. Berridge,et al.  Photoreceptor excitation and adaptation by inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate , 1984, Nature.

[44]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Adaptation of the motion-sensitive neuron H1 is generated locally and governed by contrast frequency , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[45]  J W Moore,et al.  Adaptation in the input‐output relation of the synapse made by the barnacle's photoreceptor. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[46]  P. Simmons POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIALS OF LIMITED DURATION IN VISUAL NEURONES OF A LOCUST , 1985 .

[47]  Currents in the Synaptic Terminals of Barnacle Photoreceptors , 1986 .

[48]  S B Laughlin,et al.  Synaptic limitations to contrast coding in the retina of the blowfly Calliphora , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[49]  Hans Straka,et al.  Synaptic Chloride Channels Generating Hyperpolarizing On-Responses in Monopolar Neurones of the Blowfly Visual System , 1987 .

[50]  Barbara Blakeslee,et al.  The intracellular pupil mechanism and photoreceptor signal: noise ratios in the fly Lucilia cuprina , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[51]  P. Simmons,et al.  Evidence That Histamine is a Neurotransmitter of Photoreceptors in the Locust Ocellus , 1988 .

[52]  Matti Järvilehto,et al.  More than One Type of Conductance is Activated During Responses of Blowfly Monopolar Neurones , 1989 .

[53]  R. Hardie,et al.  A histamine-activated chloride channel involved in neurotransmission at a photoreceptor synapse , 1989, Nature.

[54]  Simon B. Laughlin,et al.  Coding Efficiency and Design in Visual Processing , 1989 .

[55]  Dan-Eric Nilsson,et al.  Optics and Evolution of the Compound Eye , 1989 .

[56]  R. Barlow,et al.  Circadian Rhythms in the Invertebrate Retina , 1989 .

[57]  Daniel Osorio,et al.  Mechanisms for Neural Signal Enhancement in the Blowfly Compound Eye , 1989 .

[58]  R. Payne,et al.  Phototransduction in Limulus Ventral Photoreceptors: Roles of Calcium and Inositol Trisphosphate , 1989 .

[59]  K. Vogt Distribution of Insect Visual Chromophores: Functional and Phylogenetic Aspects , 1989 .

[60]  Keith R.F. Elliott,et al.  Biochemistry, 3rd edn , 1990 .