Inter- and intra-laboratory comparison of a multibiodosimetric approach to triage in a simulated, large scale radiation emergency

Abstract Purpose: The European Union's Seventh Framework Programme-funded project ‘Multi-disciplinary biodosimetric tools to manage high scale radiological casualties’ (MULTIBIODOSE) has developed a multiparametric approach to radiation biodosimetry, with a particular emphasis on triage of large numbers of potentially exposed individuals following accidental exposures. In November 2012, an emergency exercise took place which tested the capabilities of the MULTIBIODOSE project partners. The exercise described here had a dual purpose: Intercomparison of (i) three biodosimetric assays, and (ii) the capabilities of the seven laboratories, with regards to provision of triage status for suspected radiation exposed individuals. Materials and methods: Three biological dosimetry tools – the dicentric, micronucleus and gamma-H2AX (the phosphorylated form of member X of histone H2A, in response to DNA double-strand breaks) foci assays – were tested, in addition to provision of the triage status results (low exposure: < 1 Gy; medium exposure: 1–2 Gy; high exposure: > 2 Gy) by the MULTIBIODOSE software. The exercise was run in two modes: An initial triage categorisation of samples (based on the first dose estimates for each assay received from each laboratory) followed by collation of the full set of estimated doses (all the results from all modes of each assay carried out by the participating laboratories) calculated using as many modes of operation as possible of the different assays developed during the project. Simulated acute whole body and partial body exposures were included. Results: The results of the initial triage categorisation and the full comparison of assays and methods within and between laboratories are presented here. Conclusions: The data demonstrate that the MULTIBIODOSE approach of applying multiparametric tools to radiation emergencies is valid and effective.

[1]  H Thierens,et al.  Is a semi-automated approach indicated in the application of the automated micronucleus assay for triage purposes? , 2014, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[2]  J F Barquinero,et al.  Biological Dosimetry Intercomparison Exercise: An Evaluation of Triage and Routine Mode Results by Robust Methods , 2011, Radiation research.

[3]  Elizabeth A Ainsbury,et al.  Manual versus automated γ-H2AX foci analysis across five European laboratories: can this assay be used for rapid biodosimetry in a large scale radiation accident? , 2013, Mutation research.

[4]  Jian Zhang,et al.  THE RABIT: A RAPID AUTOMATED BIODOSIMETRY TOOL FOR RADIOLOGICAL TRIAGE , 2010, Health physics.

[5]  François Trompier,et al.  Radiation-induced signals analysed by EPR spectrometry applied to fortuitous dosimetry. , 2009, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.

[6]  J F Barquinero,et al.  Automatic scoring of dicentric chromosomes as a tool in large scale radiation accidents. , 2013, Mutation research.

[7]  Elizabeth A Ainsbury,et al.  Multibiodose Radiation Emergency Triage Categorization Software , 2014, Health physics.

[8]  H. Thierens,et al.  A semi-automated micronucleus-centromere assay to assess low-dose radiation exposure in human lymphocytes , 2011, International journal of radiation biology.

[9]  Ruth C. Wilkins,et al.  Biological Dosimetry by the Triage Dicentric Chromosome Assay: Potential Implications for Treatment of Acute Radiation Syndrome in Radiological Mass Casualties , 2011, Radiation research.

[10]  H Thierens,et al.  Comparison of Established and Emerging Biodosimetry Assays , 2013, Radiation research.

[11]  Maurizio Marrale,et al.  EPR dosimetry intercomparison using smart phone touch screen glass , 2014, Radiation and Environmental Biophysics.

[12]  O. Guipaud.  Serum and plasma proteomics and its possible use as detector and predictor of radiation diseases. , 2013, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.

[13]  Hubert Thierens,et al.  Automated micronucleus (MN) scoring for population triage in case of large scale radiation events , 2010, International journal of radiation biology.

[14]  Hubert Thierens,et al.  The dicentric assay in triage mode as a reliable biodosimetric scoring strategy for population triage in large scale radiation accidents , 2012 .

[15]  Emad A. Ahmed,et al.  Persistent DNA Damage after High Dose In Vivo Gamma Exposure of Minipig Skin , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  Kai Rothkamm,et al.  Gamma-H2AX-Based Dose Estimation for Whole and Partial Body Radiation Exposure , 2011, PloS one.

[17]  G. W. Dolphin,et al.  BIOLOGICAL DOSIMETRY WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO CHROMOSOME ABERRATION ANALYSIS. A REVIEW OF METHODS. , 1969 .

[18]  J H Hendry,et al.  ICRP PUBLICATION 118: ICRP Statement on Tissue Reactions and Early and Late Effects of Radiation in Normal Tissues and Organs — Threshold Doses for Tissue Reactions in a Radiation Protection Context , 2012, Annals of the ICRP.

[19]  K Rothkamm,et al.  Interlaboratory Variation in Scoring Dicentric Chromosomes in a Case of Partial-Body X-Ray Exposure: Implications for Biodosimetry Networking and Cytogenetic “Triage Mode” Scoring , 2009, Radiation research.

[20]  P. Andreo,et al.  Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water , 2001 .

[21]  Emanuela Bortolin,et al.  Radiation-induced damage analysed by luminescence methods in retrospective dosimetry and emergency response. , 2009, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.