Bioactive Glass as a Bone Substitute for Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparative Study With Iliac Crest Autograft

Background: Iliac crest autograft is currently the gold standard material for spinal fusion. However, its use is limited by additional operative time, increased blood loss, and morbidity. Recently, a synthetic osteoconductive bone graft material composed of bioactive glass has been described, with high effectiveness in animal models. Its ability to achieve spinal fusion in human has never been reported. The aim of this study was to compare bioactive glass and iliac crest autograft as bone substitutes in the treatment thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: Eighty-eight consecutive patients underwent posterior spinal fusion for progressive thoracic AIS. There were 2 study groups based on the type of bone graft used: iliac crest autograft (n = 40) or bioglass (n = 48). A minimum 2-year follow-up was required. Medical data and radiographs were retrospectively analyzed and compared using unpaired t test and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Mean follow-up was 40 months in the autograft group and 38 months in the bioglass group. In the autograft group, there were 2 infections (5%) and 3 mechanical failures (7.5%). One infection (2%) and 1 early mechanical failure (2%) occurred in the bioglass group. Loss of correction of the main thoracic curve between immediate postoperative and latest follow-up averaged 15.5% for autograft group and 11% for the bioglass group (P = 0.025).The mean (±SD) gain of frontal balance between immediate postoperative latest follow-up was 0.8 (±9.3) mm in the autograft group and 8.1 (±12) mm for the bioglass group (P = 0.005). Conclusions: Results of this retrospective study suggest that bioglass is as effective as iliac crest graft to achieve fusion and maintain correction in AIS. Less complications were seen in the bioactive glass group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Bioactive glass can be proposed in the treatment of AIS, avoiding the morbidity of iliac crest harvesting. However, clinical and radiological outcomes need to be confirmed at long-term follow-up. Level of Evidence: Level III

[1]  D. Togawa,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Study of Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion Using Osteogenic Protein-1 (OP-1) Versus Local Autograft With Ceramic Bone Substitute: Emphasis of Surgical Exploration and Histologic Assessment , 2006, Spine.

[2]  R. Mengel,et al.  Bioabsorbable membrane and bioactive glass in the treatment of intrabony defects in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis: results of a 5-year clinical and radiological study. , 2003, Journal of periodontology.

[3]  J. Roush,et al.  Evaluation of healing in feline femoral defects filled with cancellous autograft, cancellous allograft or Bioglass , 2005, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[4]  M. Ylikoski,et al.  Cotrel-Dubousset (CD) or Universal Spine System (USS) Instrumentation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS): Comparison of Midterm Clinical, Functional, and Radiologic Outcomes , 2004, Spine.

[5]  P. Violas,et al.  Local Autograft Bone in the Surgical Management of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2004, Spine.

[6]  M. Ylikoski,et al.  Harrington and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Long-term functional and radiographic outcomes. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  J. Connolly,et al.  Comparison of Bone Grafts for Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2003, Spine.

[8]  Y. Ohkoshi,et al.  Clinical Results of Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the Brantigan I/F Carbon Cage Filled With a Mixture of Local Morselized Bone and Bioactive Ceramic Granules , 2002, Spine.

[9]  T. Stoll,et al.  β-tricalcium phosphate as a bone substitute for dorsal spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: preliminary results of a prospective clinical study , 2001, European Spine Journal.

[10]  V. Goldberg.  Bone grafts and their substitutes: facts, fiction, and futures. , 2001, Orthopedics.

[11]  P. Robertson,et al.  Natural History of Posterior Iliac Crest Bone Graft Donation for Spinal Surgery: A Prospective Analysis of Morbidity , 2001, Spine.

[12]  Michael T. Wilson,et al.  Antibacterial activity of particulate bioglass against supra- and subgingival bacteria. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[13]  J. Thalgott,et al.  Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion using coralline hydroxyapatite with or without demineralized bone matrix, as an adjunct to autologous bone. , 2001, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[14]  T. Stoll,et al.  Beta-tricalcium phosphate as a bone substitute for dorsal spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: preliminary results of a prospective clinical study. , 2001, European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society.

[15]  R. Kay,et al.  Complications of Posterior Iliac Crest Bone Grafting in Spine Surgery in Children , 2000, Spine.

[16]  S. Takahashi,et al.  A synthetic porous ceramic as a bone graft substitute in the surgical management of scoliosis: a prospective, randomized study. , 2000, Spine.

[17]  J. Blanco,et al.  Allograft Bone Use During Instrumentation and Fusion in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1997, Spine.

[18]  H. Oonishi,et al.  Particulate Bioglass Compared With Hydroxyapatite as a Bone Graft Substitute , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  Banwart Jc,et al.  Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity. A statistical evaluation. , 1995 .

[20]  Marc A. Asher,et al.  Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvest Donor Site Morbidity: A Statistical Evaluation , 1995, Spine.

[21]  S D Cook,et al.  Effect of recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 on healing of segmental defects in non-human primates. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  S. Cook,et al.  In Vivo Evaluation of Demineralized Bone Matrix as a Bone Graft Substitute for Posterior Spinal Fusion , 1995, Spine.

[23]  H. An,et al.  Prospective comparison of autograft vs. allograft for adult posterolateral lumbar spine fusion: differences among freeze-dried, frozen, and mixed grafts. , 1995, Journal of spinal disorders.

[24]  C. G. Groot,et al.  Histological and biochemical evaluation of osteoblasts cultured on bioactive glass, hydroxylapatite, titanium alloy, and stainless steel. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[25]  A. Levine,et al.  Chronic Donor Site Pain Complicating Bone Graft Harvesting From the Posterior Iliac Crest for Spinal Fusion , 1992, Spine.

[26]  J. Lonstein.  Allograft versus autograft bone in idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a multivariate statistical analysis. , 1992, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[27]  L L Hench,et al.  Toxicology and biocompatibility of bioglasses. , 1981, Journal of biomedical materials research.