Ultrasonic-vibration-assisted pelleting of switchgrass: Effects of ultrasonic vibration

Biofuels produced from cellulosic biomass can be used to replace petroleum-based transportation fuels. However, the manufacturing cost of cellulosic biofuels is still high, partly due to the low density of cellulosic feedstocks. Pelleting of cellulosic feedstocks can increase their density, making their transportation and storage as well as biofuel conversion more efficient and, therefore, reducing the overall cost of biofuel manufacturing. It has been shown that ultrasonic-vibration-assisted (UV-A) pelleting, without using high-temperature steam and binder materials, can produce pellets with density comparable to that produced by conventional pelleting methods. Furthermore, the sugar yield of biomass (wheat straw) processed with UV-A pelleting is 20% higher than that of biomass pelleted without ultrasonic vibration. This paper reports an experimental investigation of UV-A pelleting of switchgrass. The influences of ultrasonic vibration on pellet density, stability, durability, and pelleting force are discussed. It is concluded that pellets processed with ultrasonic vibration had higher density and stability than those processed without ultrasonic vibration, they were more durable than those processed without ultrasonic vibration, and pelleting force with ultrasonic vibration was lower than that without ultrasonic vibration.

[1]  Shahab Sokhansanj,et al.  Binderless Pelletization of Biomass , 2005 .

[2]  Donghai Wang,et al.  Ultrasonic Vibration Assisted Pelleting of Cellulosic Biomass: A Preliminary Experiment , 2009 .

[3]  Donghai Wang,et al.  Ultrasonic Vibration-Assisted Pelleting of Cellulosic Biomass for Biofuel Manufacturing , 2011 .

[4]  L. P. Koh,et al.  Biofuels, biodiversity, and people: Understanding the conflicts and finding opportunities , 2008 .

[5]  O. Chin Characteristics of some biomass briquettes prepared under modest die pressures , 2000 .

[6]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  Biomass as Feedstock for A Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply , 2005 .

[7]  Caam Cees Withagen,et al.  Pollution and exhaustibility of fossil fuels , 1994 .

[8]  Johan E. Hustad,et al.  Toward an understanding of controlling parameters in softwood and hardwood pellets production , 2006 .

[9]  C. Wyman,et al.  Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low‐cost cellulosic ethanol , 2008 .

[10]  L. Lynd,et al.  Fuel Ethanol from Cellulosic Biomass , 1991, Science.

[11]  D. Tilman,et al.  Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass , 2006, Science.

[12]  S. Polasky,et al.  Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  J. R. Hess,et al.  Cellulosic biomass feedstocks and logistics for ethanol production , 2007 .

[14]  S. Sokhansanj,et al.  An Overview of Compaction of Biomass Grinds , 2003 .