Capacity and Error Probability Analysis of Neuro-Spike Communication Exploiting Temporal Modulation

In this paper, we consider a neuro-spike communication system between two neurons where nano-machines are used to enhance ability of neurons. Nano-machines can be employed for stimulation tasks when neurons have lost their ability to communicate. In the assumed system, information is conveyed via the time intervals between the input spikes train. For efficiency evaluation of temporal coding, we model the neuro-spike communication system by an additive Gamma noise channel. We present this model by considering different time distortion factors in the neuro-spike system. Then, we derive upper and lower bounds on the channel capacity. We analyze the channel capacity bounds as functions of the time intervals between the input spikes and the firing threshold of the target neuron. Moreover, we propose maximum likelihood and maximum a posteriori receivers and derive the resulting bit error probability when the system uses binary modulation. In addition, we obtain an upper bound for this error probability. Then, we extend this upper bound to the symbol error probability of the $T$ -ary modulations. Simulation results show that this upper bound is tight. The derived results show that temporal coding has a higher efficiency than spike rate coding in terms of achievable data rate.

[1]  E. Avignone,et al.  Gap junctions and connexin expression in the normal and pathological central nervous system , 2002, Biology of the cell.

[2]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  A Communication Theoretical Analysis of Synaptic Multiple-Access Channel in Hippocampal-Cortical Neurons , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[3]  Ian F. Akyildiz Nanonetworks: A new frontier in communications , 2010, 2010 International Conference on e-Business (ICE-B).

[4]  Behrouz Maham,et al.  Axonal transmission analysis in neuro-spike communication , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[5]  R. Stein A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF NEURONAL VARIABILITY. , 1965, Biophysical journal.

[6]  J. Ruppersberg,et al.  The mechanism of magnesium block of NMDA receptors , 1994 .

[7]  D A Turner,et al.  Waveform and amplitude characteristics of evoked responses to dendritic stimulation of CA1 guinea‐pig pyramidal cells. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Neural and Immunological Synaptic Relations , 2002, Science.

[9]  Elad Alon,et al.  Neural Dust: An Ultrasonic, Low Power Solution for Chronic Brain-Machine Interfaces , 2013, 1307.2196.

[10]  C. Stam,et al.  Small-world networks and functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  Ozgur B. Akan,et al.  Diffusion-Based Model for Synaptic Molecular Communication Channel , 2017, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[12]  Oscar Herreras,et al.  The Influence of Synaptic Size on AMPA Receptor Activation: A Monte Carlo Model , 2015, PloS one.

[13]  Zengcai V. Guo,et al.  A motor cortex circuit for motor planning and movement , 2015, Nature.

[14]  Ilangko Balasingham,et al.  Nanomachine-to-Neuron Communication Interfaces for Neuronal Stimulation at Nanoscale , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[15]  Yevgeni Koucheryavy,et al.  A Service-Oriented Architecture for Body Area NanoNetworks with Neuron-based Molecular Communication , 2014, Mob. Networks Appl..

[16]  P. Greengard The neurobiology of slow synaptic transmission. , 2001, Science.

[17]  M. Abeles,et al.  Transmission of information by the axon: I. Noise and memory in the myelinated nerve fiber of the frog , 1975, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Graphene-based Plasmonic Nano-Antenna for Terahertz Band Communication in Nanonetworks , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[19]  Emily F. Stone,et al.  Identifying neurotransmitter spill-over in hippocampal field recordings. , 2012, Mathematical biosciences.

[20]  Asohan Amarasingham,et al.  At what time scale does the nervous system operate? , 2003, Neurocomputing.

[21]  Behrouz Maham,et al.  Axonal Channel Capacity in Neuro-Spike Communication , 2018, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[22]  E. Stålberg,et al.  Axonal stimulation for end-plate jitter studies. , 1986, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[23]  Dmitri Botvich,et al.  Development of artificial neuronal networks for molecular communication , 2011, Nano Commun. Networks.

[24]  O. Petroff,et al.  Book Review: GABA and Glutamate in the Human Brain , 2002 .

[25]  S E Fienberg,et al.  Stochastic models for single neuron firing trains: a survey. , 1974, Biometrics.

[26]  L. Pinneo On noise in the nervous system. , 1966, Psychological review.

[27]  Toby Berger,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Energy Efficient Neural Computation and Communication , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[28]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[29]  Behrouz Maham,et al.  Capacity bounds of neuro-spike communication by exploiting temporal modulations , 2018, 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[30]  Thomas A. Nielsen,et al.  Modulation of Glutamate Mobility Reveals the Mechanism Underlying Slow-Rising AMPAR EPSCs and the Diffusion Coefficient in the Synaptic Cleft , 2004, Neuron.

[31]  Behrouz Maham,et al.  Error probability analysis of neuro-spike communication channel , 2017, 2017 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC).

[32]  E. P. Huang,et al.  Synaptic transmission: Spillover at central synapses , 1998, Current Biology.

[33]  Christof Koch,et al.  Detecting and Estimating Signals over Noisy and Unreliable Synapses: Information-Theoretic Analysis , 2001, Neural Computation.

[34]  Behrouz Maham,et al.  Joint Optimization of Input Spike Rate and Receiver Decision Threshold to Maximize Achievable Bit Rate of Neuro-Spike Communication Channel , 2019, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[35]  Edward L Cussler,et al.  Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems , 1984 .

[36]  Anthony N. Burkitt,et al.  A Review of the Integrate-and-fire Neuron Model: I. Homogeneous Synaptic Input , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[37]  Ilangko Balasingham,et al.  Novel treatment strategies for neurodegenerative diseases based on RF exposure , 2011, ISABEL '11.

[38]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  A Physical Channel Model for Nanoscale Neuro-Spike Communications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[39]  Tommaso Melodia,et al.  Opto-ultrasonic communications in wireless body area nanonetworks , 2013, 2013 Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[40]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Information theory and neural coding , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  Ilangko Balasingham,et al.  Peer-to-Peer Communication in Neuronal Nano-Network , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[42]  Massimiliano Pierobon,et al.  A physical end-to-end model for molecular communication in nanonetworks , 2010, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[43]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  Molecular communication nanonetworks inside human body , 2012, Nano Commun. Networks.

[44]  Ilangko Balasingham,et al.  On the Upper Bound of the Information Capacity in Neuronal Synapses , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[45]  G. Parisi Brownian motion , 2005, Nature.

[46]  J. Henley,et al.  Shaping the synaptic signal: molecular mobility inside and outside the cleft , 2011, Trends in Neurosciences.

[47]  Ozgur B. Akan,et al.  Information Capacity of Vesicle Release in Neuro-Spike Communication , 2018, IEEE Communications Letters.