The Group of 77 in the international climate negotiations: recent developments and future directions

First, we describe and analyze the main set of G77 positions in the climate negotiations and the dynamics behind the emergence of these positions. While it is puzzling that the G77 has managed to maintain itself as a group in spite of internal differences along variables as prosperity, emissions and vulnerability to climate change, we claim that a core element behind this cohesion is that these countries share domestic governance problems as much as poverty and economic underdevelopment. Second, we discuss how recent trends of economic and political development in the third world influence the climate policy strategies of the G77 group in the future. The main factor here is the economicand social progress in states like China, India and Brazil, which separates them from the poorer and less powerful G77 states. Increasing heterogeneity along variables like governance, growth, and importance for the international economy is creating an increasing drive among the most successful G77 states towards bilateral agreements with industrialised powers. We do not foresee a departure from traditional G77 positions and membership by these states in the official climate negotiations or a departure from the Kyoto process, but an increasing reliance on bilateral agreements with industrialized countries that link considerations for energy security and the environment. The ability to gain these advantages without commitments may make these states less interested in adopting commitments for the post-Kyoto period. This is unfortunate for the LDCs and the AOSIS groups within the G77, who probably are most vulnerable to climate change.

[1]  J. Ikeme Climate Change Daaptational Deficiencies in Developing Countries: the Case of Sub-Saharan Africa , 2003 .

[2]  M. Schreurs,et al.  The internationalization of environmental protection: List of contributors , 1997 .

[3]  Michael B. McElroy,et al.  Energizing China: Reconciling Environmental Protection and Economic Growth , 1998 .

[4]  Richard J. T. Klein,et al.  Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions , 2005 .

[5]  Nicholas Thomas,et al.  Human security and public health in Southeast Asia: the SARS outbreak , 2004 .

[6]  Engaging developing countries in climate change: (KISS and Make-Up!) , 2003 .

[7]  K. Baumert,et al.  What might a developing country climate commitment look like , 1999 .

[8]  Peter Lyon,et al.  The Group of 77: A Perspective View , 1980 .

[9]  Peter Newell,et al.  Climate for Change: Non-State Actors and the Global Politics of the Greenhouse , 2006 .

[10]  Kevin A. Baumert,et al.  Building on the Kyoto Protocol: Options for Protecting the Climate , 2002 .

[11]  Gørild M. Heggelund China's Climate Change Policy: Domestic and International Developments* , 2007 .

[12]  R. Jackson,et al.  Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World , 1990 .

[13]  Elizabeth C. Economy The Great Leap Backward , 2007 .

[14]  Marc A. Williams The Third World and Global Environmental Negotiations: Interests, Institutions and Ideas , 2005, Global Environmental Politics.

[15]  Michael Grubb,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment , 1999 .

[16]  P. Harris Global warming and East Asia : the domestic and international politics of climate change , 2003 .

[17]  A. Najam Developing Countries and Global Environmental Governance: From Contestation to Participation to Engagement , 2005 .

[18]  C. Clapham Degrees of statehood , 1998, Review of International Studies.

[19]  I. Taylor,et al.  China's oil diplomacy in Africa , 2006 .

[20]  K. Tangen,et al.  China's Climate Change Positions: At a Turning Point? , 2001 .

[21]  N. Harris The end of the Third World : newly industrializing countries and the decline of an ideology , 1987 .

[22]  Unfccc Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .

[23]  Michael Webber,et al.  Will OPEC lose from the Kyoto Protocol , 2004 .

[24]  J. Depledge,et al.  The international climate change regime , 2004 .

[25]  Dominic Wilson,et al.  Dreaming With BRICs: The Path to 2050 , 2006 .

[26]  Sebastian Oberthür,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol , 1999 .

[27]  Katharine Vincent,et al.  Uncertainty in adaptive capacity , 2005 .

[28]  J. Gupta On Behalf of My Delegation: A Survival Guide for Developing Country Climate Negotiators Winnipeg , 2000 .

[29]  J. Rapley The New Middle Ages , 2006 .

[30]  J. Depledge,et al.  The International Climate Change Regime: A Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures , 2005 .