The BioMonitor 2 insertable cardiac monitor: Clinical experience with a novel implantable cardiac monitor.

INTRODUCTION Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are leadless subcutaneous devices that allow cardiac monitoring for up to 3 years and are a valuable tool in the diagnosis of arrhythmias, cryptogenic stroke and unexplained syncope. The Biotronik BioMonitor 2 is a novel, insertable ILR allowing long-term continuous monitoring with wireless telemetry options. METHODS A single-center, prospective, observational study investigating the reliability of sensing quality and detection performance in the BioMonitor 2 ILR, as well as post-implantation patient satisfaction. R-wave amplitude was recorded immediately post implantation and 1 day post implantation, followed by extensive patient instruction. Follow-up was scheduled after 3 months, or after an event. Data from the ILR were retrieved, with documentation of all episodes, R-wave amplitude and noise burden. The anatomical position of the ILR was determined 1 day post implantation and after 3 months. A patient questionnaire was conducted after 3 months. RESULTS 30 consecutive patients (mean age 71 ± 12 years, 56% male) were analyzed. Indications for ILR implantation were: unexplained syncope (n = 24, 80%), suspected atrial fibrillation (n = 4, 13%), cryptogenic stroke (n = 1, 3%) and palpitations (n = 1, 3%). Median time from skin cut to suture was 8 min. No complications occurred. Mean R-wave amplitude at implantation was 0.84 ± 0.32 mV, at day 1 post implantation 0.96 ± 0.31 mV, and after a mean follow-up of 85 ± 24 days 1.02 ± 0.47 mV (p = 0.01). The mean noise burden was 1.4 ± 2%. CONCLUSION Implantation of the novel BioMonitor 2 ILR is fast and uncomplicated. Initial sensing values are good and improve over time.

[1]  N. Freemantle,et al.  The benefit of a remotely monitored implantable loop recorder as a first line investigation in unexplained syncope: the EaSyAS II trial. , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  N. Reinsch,et al.  Maintaining Accurate Long‐Term Sensing Ability Despite Significant Size Reduction of Implantable Cardiac Monitors , 2016, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[3]  A. Raviele,et al.  Recurrent unexplained palpitations (RUP) study comparison of implantable loop recorder versus conventional diagnostic strategy. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  A. Kawashima,et al.  Investigation of optimal position for implantable loop recorders by potential mapping with Reveal DX , 2015, Journal of arrhythmia.

[5]  Dhanunjaya R. Lakkireddy,et al.  Initial real world experience with a novel insertable (Reveal LinQ(@Medtronic)) compared to the conventional (Reveal XT(@Medtronic)) implantable loop recorder at a tertiary care center - Points to ponder! , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[6]  K. Kelly,et al.  Atrial fibrillation detected by mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry in cryptogenic TIA or stroke , 2008, Neurology.

[7]  Rahul Mehra,et al.  Comparison of continuous versus intermittent monitoring of atrial arrhythmias. , 2006, Heart rhythm.

[8]  D. Lin,et al.  Assessing Arrhythmia Burden After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using an Implantable Loop Recorder: The ABACUS Study , 2013, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[9]  J. Blanc,et al.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009) The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) , 2009 .

[10]  M. Del Greco,et al.  Clinical impact, safety, and accuracy of the remotely monitored implantable loop recorder Medtronic Reveal LINQTM , 2018, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[11]  Neil Sulke,et al.  Are implantable cardiac monitors the 'gold standard' for atrial fibrillation detection? A prospective randomized trial comparing atrial fibrillation monitoring using implantable cardiac monitors and DDDRP permanent pacemakers in post atrial fibrillation ablation patients. , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[12]  Jian Cao,et al.  R-Wave Sensing in an Implantable Cardiac Monitor without ECG-Based Preimplant Mapping: Results from a Multicenter Clinical Trial , 2013, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[13]  A. Brandes,et al.  Use of an implantable loop recorder to increase the diagnostic yield in unexplained syncope: results from the PICTURE registry , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[14]  W. Haverkamp,et al.  Performance of the New BioMonitor 2‐AF Insertable Cardiac Monitoring System: Can Better be Worse? , 2017, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[15]  S. Malnick,et al.  Cryptogenic stroke and atrial fibrillation. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  A. Krahn,et al.  Remote Electrocardiographic Monitoring with a Wireless Implantable Loop Recorder: Minimizing the Data Review Burden , 2010, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[17]  A. Mortara,et al.  Cardiac Rhythm Monitoring After Acute Decompensation for Heart Failure: Results from the CARRYING ON for HF Pilot Study , 2016, JMIR research protocols.

[18]  S. Parry,et al.  Implantable loop recorders in the investigation of unexplained syncope: a state of the art review , 2010, Heart.

[19]  S. Ooi,et al.  BioMonitor 2 Pilot Study: Early Experience With Implantation of the Biotronik BioMonitor 2 Implantable Cardiac Monitor. , 2017, Heart, lung & circulation.

[20]  S. Willems,et al.  Implantable loop recorder monitoring after concomitant surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF): insights from more than 200 continuously monitored patients , 2016, Heart and Vessels.

[21]  M. Falagas,et al.  Risk factors for cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[22]  Theodor Landis,et al.  Usefulness of Ambulatory 7-Day ECG Monitoring for the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter After Acute Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack , 2004, Stroke.

[23]  C. Israel,et al.  Long-term risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation as documented by an implantable monitoring device: implications for optimal patient care. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  K. Walsh,et al.  A retrospective study of the clinical experience of the implantable loop recorder in a paediatric setting , 2007, International journal of clinical practice.