Sexual dimorphism as a facilitator of worker caste evolution in ants

Abstract Ant societies are primarily composed of females, whereby labor is divided into reproductive, or queen, and non‐reproductive, or worker, castes. Workers and reproductive queens can differ greatly in behavior, longevity, physiology, and morphology, but queen–worker differences are usually modest relative to the differences in males. Males are short‐lived, typically do not provide the colony with labor, often look like a different species, and only occur seasonally. It is these differences that have historically led to their neglect in social insect research, but also why they may facilitate novel phenotypic variation – by increasing the phenotypic variability that is available for selection. In this study, worker variation in multivariate size–shape space paralleled male–queen variation. As worker variation increased within species, so did sexual variation. Across species in two independent genera, using head width as a proxy for body size, sexual size dimorphism correlated with worker polymorphism regardless of whether the ancestral condition was large or small worker/sexual dimorphism. Mounting molecular data support the hypothesis that queen–worker caste determination has co‐opted many genes/pathways from sex determination. The molecular evidence, coupled with the observations from this study, leads to the hypothesis that sexual selection and selection on colony‐level traits are non‐independent, and that sexual dimorphism may even have facilitated the evolution of the distinct worker caste.

[1]  Qiye Li,et al.  Canalized gene expression during development mediates caste differentiation in ants , 2022, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[2]  S. Aron,et al.  The evolution of ant worker polymorphism correlates with multiple social traits , 2021, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  R. Beutel,et al.  Anatomy and evolution of the head of Dorylus helvolus (Formicidae: Dorylinae): Patterns of sex‐ and caste‐limited traits in the sausagefly and the driver ant , 2021, Journal of morphology.

[4]  R. Irizarry ggplot2 , 2019, Introduction to Data Science.

[5]  T. Linksvayer,et al.  Convergent eusocial evolution is based on a shared reproductive groundplan plus lineage-specific plastic genes , 2019, Nature Communications.

[6]  L. Foster,et al.  Feminizer and doublesex knock-outs cause honey bees to switch sexes , 2019, PLoS biology.

[7]  O. Kaftanoğlu,et al.  A genetic switch for worker nutrition-mediated traits in honeybees , 2019, PLoS biology.

[8]  M. Noureddine,et al.  Conserved roles of Osiris genes in insect development, polymorphism and protection , 2018, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[9]  E. Abouheif,et al.  Regulation, development, and evolution of caste ratios in the hyperdiverse ant genus Pheidole. , 2017, Current opinion in insect science.

[10]  Kevin W. Eliceiri,et al.  ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data , 2017, BMC Bioinformatics.

[11]  C. Moreau,et al.  A new ant genus from southern Argentina and southern Chile, Patagonomyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). , 2016, Zootaxa.

[12]  J. Oettler,et al.  Evolution of Social Insect Polyphenism Facilitated by the Sex Differentiation Cascade , 2016, PLoS genetics.

[13]  Brian R Johnson,et al.  Complex patterns of differential expression in candidate master regulatory genes for social behavior in honey bees , 2016, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  J. Witte The Ants , 2016 .

[15]  B. Guénard,et al.  Introduced Pheidole of the world: taxonomy, biology and distribution , 2015, ZooKeys.

[16]  Seán G. Brady,et al.  How Do Genomes Create Novel Phenotypes? Insights from the Loss of the Worker Caste in Ant Social Parasites , 2015, Molecular biology and evolution.

[17]  Robert W. Taylor,et al.  The Ants of Polynesia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). , 2013 .

[18]  Christopher D. Smith,et al.  Patterns of DNA Methylation in Development, Division of Labor and Hybridization in an Ant with Genetic Caste Determination , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  D. Wheeler,et al.  Evolution of Novel Mosaic Castes in Ants: Modularity, Phenotypic Plasticity, and Colonial Buffering , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[20]  E. Abouheif,et al.  Ancestral Developmental Potential Facilitates Parallel Evolution in Ants , 2012, Science.

[21]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[22]  W. Haerty,et al.  Ontogeny and phylogeny: molecular signatures of selection, constraint, and temporal pleiotropy in the development of Drosophila , 2009, BMC Biology.

[23]  G. Robinson,et al.  Genetic and genomic analyses of the division of labour in insect societies , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[24]  A. Suarez,et al.  Caste Determination in a Polymorphic Social Insect: Nutritional, Social, and Genetic Factors , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[25]  C. Moreau Unraveling the evolutionary history of the hyperdiverse ant genus Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). , 2008, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[26]  J. Boomsma,et al.  Genetic royal cheats in leaf-cutting ant societies , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Laurent Keller,et al.  Maternal Effect on Female Caste Determination in a Social Insect , 2008, Current Biology.

[28]  Christopher R. Smith Energy use and allocation in the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius: are stored seeds a buffer? , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[29]  W. Tschinkel,et al.  The sociometry and sociogenesis of reproduction in the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius , 2006, Journal of insect science.

[30]  R. Crozier,et al.  The Evolution of Worker Caste Diversity in Social Insects , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[31]  H. Fowler,et al.  Pheidole in the New World: A Dominant, Hyperdiverse Ant Genus , 2005 .

[32]  R. E. Page,et al.  The Gene csd Is the Primary Signal for Sexual Development in the Honeybee and Encodes an SR-Type Protein , 2003, Cell.

[33]  Anthony D. Griffiths,et al.  Responses of ant communities to dry sulfur deposition from mining emissions in semi‐arid tropical Australia, with implications for the use of functional groups , 2000 .

[34]  W. Tschinkel Sociometry and sociogenesis of colonies of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius: worker characteristics in relation to colony size and season , 1998, Insectes Sociaux.

[35]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[36]  E. Wilson,et al.  Caste and ecology in the social insects. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[37]  W. Brown THE IDENTITY AND SYNONYMY OF PHEIDOLE VIGILANS, A COMMON ANT OF SOUTHEASTERN AUSTRALIA (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) , 1971 .

[38]  Marion R. Smith Pogonomyrmex Harvester Ants: A Study of the Genus in North America , 1969 .

[39]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[40]  mith,et al.  The causes and consequences of genetic caste determination in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2008 .

[41]  S. Taber The world of the harvester ants , 1998 .

[42]  B. Bolton A New General Catalogue of the Ants of the World , 1995 .

[43]  J. Seger Sexual dimorphism in the Hymenoptera , 1994 .