Comparing aortic root replacements: porcine bioroots versus pericardial versus mechanical composite roots: hemodynamic and ventricular remodeling at greater than one-year follow-up.

[1]  J. Bavaria,et al.  Durability of porcine bioroots in younger patients with aortic root pathology: a propensity-matched comparison with composite mechanical roots. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  T. Doenst,et al.  Where is the common sense in aortic valve replacement? A review of hemodynamics and sizing of stented tissue valves. , 2011, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  J. Rodés‐Cabau,et al.  Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for the treatment of stentless aortic valve dysfunction. , 2010, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  Ronen Gurvitch,et al.  Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation for Failed Bioprosthetic Heart Valves , 2010, Circulation.

[5]  B. Zagorski,et al.  Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve with the Toronto Stentless Porcine Valve. , 2010, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  M. Yacoub,et al.  Surgical treatment of active native aortic valve endocarditis with allografts and mechanical prostheses. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  A. Cheung,et al.  Transcatheter valve-in-valve aortic valve implantation: 16-month follow-up. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  I. Florath,et al.  The Freestyle Stentless Bioprosthesis in more than 1000 Patients: A Single‐Center Experience over 10 Years , 2009, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[9]  C. Ruiz,et al.  First percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve‐in‐valve implant with three year follow‐up , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[10]  T. Sundt,et al.  Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  P. Wenaweser,et al.  Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation in degenerated bioprosthesis: The first valve in valve procedure using the corevalve revalving system , 2007, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[12]  D. Bach,et al.  Freedom from structural valve deterioration among patients aged < or = 60 years undergoing Freestyle stentless aortic valve replacement. , 2007, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[13]  J. Bavaria,et al.  Reoperative aortic root replacement in patients with previous aortic surgery. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  M. Borger,et al.  Stentless aortic valve reoperations: a surgical challenge. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  C. Etz,et al.  Aortic root reconstruction with a bioprosthetic valved conduit: a consecutive series of 275 procedures. , 2007, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[16]  N. Smedira,et al.  Are allografts the biologic valve of choice for aortic valve replacement in nonelderly patients? Comparison of explantation for structural valve deterioration of allograft and pericardial prostheses. , 2006, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  Philippe Pibarot,et al.  Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Cardiac Events and Midterm Mortality After Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Pure Aortic Stenosis , 2006, Circulation.

[18]  Ofer Merin,et al.  Long-term results of aortic valve replacement with the St. Jude Toronto stentless porcine valve. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  J. Coselli,et al.  St. Jude Medical Toronto biologic aortic root prosthesis: early FDA phase II IDE study results. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[20]  J. Bavaria,et al.  Initial experience with the Toronto Root bioprosthesis. , 2004, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[21]  E. Wolner,et al.  Relation between size of prosthesis and valve gradient: comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis. , 2004, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[22]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  W G Henderson,et al.  Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  S. Armstrong,et al.  Dilation of the pulmonary autograft after the Ross procedure. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[25]  T. David,et al.  Histologic abnormalities of the ascending aorta and pulmonary trunk in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease: clinical relevance to the ross procedure. , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[26]  J. Pepper,et al.  Perioperative assessment of aortic homograft, Toronto stentless valve, and stented valve in the aortic position. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[27]  H. Bentall,et al.  A technique for complete replacement of the ascending aorta , 1968, Thorax.