Bacterial Quorum Sensing and Metabolic Incentives to Cooperate

Cheat Control In quorum-sensing induction, a Pseudomonas aeruginosa population growing on a single carbon source, such as casein, will reach a density where the levels of signaling molecules they collectively secrete triggers the cells to synthesize and secrete proteases to digest the casein. However, it is metabolically costly to secrete proteases, and the system is prone to mutant “cheats.” These cheats do not respond to quorum sensing and do not go to the cost of synthesizing protease, but they do profit from the breakdown products that allow all the cells—cheats and cooperators alike—to grow. Dandekar et al. (p. 264) found that quorum signaling–insensitive P. aeruginosa cheats could not synthesize nucleotide hydrolase and were thus unable to grow if casein was replaced by adenosine. This allowed cooperators to outgrow the cheats, leading to a stable equilibrium between cheats and cooperators. This principle of regulation may be applicable to other bacterial quorum-sensing systems and might be exploited in the development of drugs that disrupt bacterial cooperation. Cooperating groups of bacteria resist infiltration by noncooperating cheats by co-regulating shared and individual products. The opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa uses a cell-cell communication system termed “quorum sensing” to control production of public goods, extracellular products that can be used by any community member. Not all individuals respond to quorum-sensing signals and synthesize public goods. Such social cheaters enjoy the benefits of the products secreted by cooperators. There are some P. aeruginosa cellular enzymes controlled by quorum sensing, and we show that quorum sensing–controlled expression of such private goods can put a metabolic constraint on social cheating and prevent a tragedy of the commons. Metabolic constraint of social cheating provides an explanation for private-goods regulation by a cooperative system and has general implications for population biology, infection control, and stabilization of quorum-sensing circuits in synthetic biology.

[1]  Qing Yang,et al.  Conservation of genome content and virulence determinants among clinical and environmental isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  K. Foster,et al.  A molecular mechanism that stabilizes cooperative secretions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2011, Molecular microbiology.

[3]  D. Ohman,et al.  Synthesis of multiple exoproducts in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is under the control of RhlR-RhlI, another set of regulators in strain PAO1 with homology to the autoinducer-responsive LuxR-LuxI family , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  A. Griffin,et al.  Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations , 2007, Nature.

[5]  C. Harwood,et al.  Regulation of benzoate-CoA ligase in Rhodopseudomonas palustris , 1991 .

[6]  Martin Schuster,et al.  The Sociomicrobiology of Antivirulence Drug Resistance: a Proof of Concept , 2011, mBio.

[7]  P. Rainey,et al.  Evolution of cooperation and conflict in experimental bacterial populations , 2003, Nature.

[8]  A. Griffin,et al.  Cooperation and Competition Between Relatives , 2002, Science.

[9]  P. Seed,et al.  Regulation of las and rhl quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[10]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Identification, Timing, and Signal Specificity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Quorum-Controlled Genes: a Transcriptome Analysis , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[11]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Strain-dependent diversity in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing regulon , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  J. Strassmann,et al.  High Relatedness Is Necessary and Sufficient to Maintain Multicellularity in Dictyostelium , 2011, Science.

[13]  S. West,et al.  Density-dependent fitness benefits in quorum-sensing bacterial populations , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  N. A. Whitehead,et al.  Quorum-sensing in Gram-negative bacteria. , 2001, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[15]  L. Guy,et al.  Quorum-Sensing-Negative (lasR) Mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Avoid Cell Lysis and Death , 2005, Journal of bacteriology.

[16]  K. Foster,et al.  Pleiotropy as a mechanism to stabilize cooperation , 2004, Nature.

[17]  M. Schuster,et al.  Social cheating in Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Quorum sensing in bacteria: the LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[19]  B. Bassler,et al.  Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. , 2005, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[20]  E. Greenberg,et al.  A network of networks: quorum-sensing gene regulation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 2006, International journal of medical microbiology : IJMM.

[21]  David A. D'Argenio,et al.  Genome mosaicism is conserved but not unique in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from the airways of young children with cystic fibrosis. , 2003, Environmental microbiology.