Chutes and Ladders

Community colleges play a large role in educating students who are historically underrepresented in computer science (CS), including women, Latino men, and Black men, as well as post-traditional (older or working) students. In spite of this, there is a dearth of research on the institutional factors that influence whether or not community college students who are enrolled in CS classes and who express an interest in transferring and completing a bachelor’s degree in the field persist. The overused “pipeline” metaphor, which indicates a supply-side lack, has been replaced by many with that of a “pathway.” However, the “pathway” image suggests a general forward-moving trend that can be misleading. In this work, we draw from qualitative interviews with 14 CS students from groups traditionally underrepresented in the field who have studied introductory computer programming at a community college to investigate the following question: “What are the institutional barriers along a CS bachelor’s degree track that includes community college?” Our findings indicate that there are three categories of institutional barriers along the transfer pathway: setbacks that hinder student progression forward, discontinuities in which students leave and re-enter the pathway, and departures in which students leave computer science and/or leave college altogether. We describe specific examples of each and introduce the idea of student movement as a game of “chutes and ladders,” a convoluted trail where students can slide backwards or off the path (chutes), necessitating the implementation of targeted institutional supports that can boost student progress forward (ladders). We suggest institutional interventions that can help students facing each type of barrier to continue on course through community college and transfer to a four-year university.

[1]  J. Jesse.  The Poverty of the Pipeline Metaphor: The AAAS/CPST Study of Nontraditional Pathways into IT/CS Education and the Workforce , 2006 .

[2]  Amber Settle,et al.  Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of the Impact of Pre-College Computing Activities on Choices of Major , 2016, TOCE.

[3]  Jeff M. Allen,et al.  Predictors of Long-Term Enrollment and Degree Outcomes for Community College Students: Integrating Academic, Psychosocial, Socio-demographic, and Situational Factors , 2010, The Journal of Higher Education.

[4]  Becky Wai-Ling Packard,et al.  WOMEN'S EXPERIENCES IN THE STEM COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRANSFER PATHWAY , 2011 .

[5]  Hadi Partovi,et al.  A comprehensive effort to expand access and diversity in computer science , 2015, Inroads.

[6]  Adrianna Kezar.  Recognizing and Serving Low-Income Students in Higher Education : An Examination of Institutional Policies, Practices, and Culture , 2011 .

[7]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Assessing Student Behavior in Computer Science Education with an fsQCA Approach , 2017, ACM Trans. Comput. Educ..

[8]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[9]  William Aspray,et al.  The Poverty of the Pipeline Metaphor: The AAAS/CPST Study of Nontraditional Pathways into IT/CS Education and the Workforce , 2008 .

[10]  Carol D. Lee.  Expanding Visions of How People Learn: The Centrality of Identity Repertoires , 2017 .

[11]  Shanna Smith Jaggars,et al.  A Longitudinal Analysis of Community College Pathways to Computer Science Bachelor’s Degrees , 2016 .

[12]  Mari Kemis,et al.  Recruiting and Retaining Women in Information Technology Programs , 2017 .

[13]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[14]  S. Harwood,et al.  Racial microaggressions at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Voices of students of color in the classroom , 2015 .

[15]  Miranda C. Parker.  Privilege and Computer Science Education: How can we level the playing field? , 2015, ICER.

[16]  Doug Jacobson,et al.  Utilizing Structural Equation Modeling and Social Cognitive Career Theory to Identify Factors in Choice of IT as a Major , 2014, TOCE.

[17]  Alicia C. Dowd,et al.  The Role of Institutional Agents in Promoting Transfer Access. , 2013 .

[18]  Shanna Smith Jaggars,et al.  The community college pathway to computer science and other STEM bachelor's degrees , 2016, 2016 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT).

[19]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[20]  M. Crul.  Snakes and Ladders in Educational Systems: Access to Higher Education for Second-Generation Turks in Europe , 2013 .

[21]  Alicia C. Dowd.  Community Colleges as Gateways and Gatekeepers: Moving beyond the Access "Saga" toward Outcome Equity , 2007 .

[22]  Jill Denner,et al.  Community College Men and Women , 2014 .

[23]  Jay B. Labov,et al.  Community Colleges in the Evolving STEM Education Landscape: Summary of a Summit , 2013 .

[24]  Lynette Kvasny,et al.  Journal of Information , Communication and Ethics in Society Power relations in IT education and work : the intersectionality of gender , race , and class , 2015 .

[25]  Kenneth A. Frank,et al.  Students' Characteristics that Facilitate the Transfer from Two-Year to Four-Year Colleges. , 1990 .

[26]  Alexander C. McCormick.  Swirling and Double-Dipping: New Patterns of Student Attendance and Their Implications for Higher Education. , 2003 .

[27]  Thomas Bailey,et al.  Referral, Enrollment, and Completion in Developmental Education Sequences in Community Colleges. CCRC Working Paper No. 15. , 2008 .