Mixing or Matching? The Influence of Voluntary Associations on the Occupational Diversity and Density of Small Business Owners' Networks

Most employeeswork in large organizations, enjoying the potential benefits of forming career-enhancing intraorganizational networks. By contrast, small business owners must look to external contexts such as voluntary associations for their business-enhancing ties. This research discusses ways through which involvement in voluntary associations can enhance or diminish occupational diversity and density for owners' networks. Whether owners met their alters (members of respondents'business discussion network, individuals they nominated as persons with whom they would discuss business matters) in voluntary association memberships and whether comemberships are concentrated in one or dispersed among several organizations influence the occupational diversity and density of their networks. The article concludes that voluntary association memberships help owners overcome some of the career isolation produced by their social location.

[1]  Pamela A. Popielarz.  (IN) VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATION , 1999 .

[2]  John Wilson,et al.  Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work , 1997 .

[3]  Kay Lehman Schlozman,et al.  Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[4]  William C. Dunkelberg,et al.  Entrepreneurial Research: Old Questions, New Answers and Methodological Issues , 1987 .

[5]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[6]  Lynn Smith-Lovin,et al.  Sex Segregation in Voluntary Associations , 1986 .

[7]  Raymond V. Liedka.  Who Do You Know in the Group?: Location of Organizations in Interpersonal Networks , 1991 .

[8]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[9]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[10]  Thomas Rotolo,et al.  A Time to Join, A Time to Quit: The Influence of Life Cycle Transitions on Voluntary Association Membership , 2000 .

[11]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Core Discussion Networks of Americans , 1987 .

[12]  Karen E. Campbell,et al.  Gender Differences in Job-Related Networks , 1988 .

[13]  A. Kalleberg,et al.  Gender and Organizational Performance: Determinants of Small Business Survival and Success , 1991 .

[14]  J. M. McPherson,et al.  On the Edge or In Between: Niche Position, Niche Overlap, and the Duration of Voluntary Association Memberships , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[16]  Bernice A. Pescosolido,et al.  The Web of Group Affiliations Revisited: Social Life, Postmodernism, and Sociology , 2000, American Sociological Review.

[17]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Changing Connectivity: A Future History of Y2.03K , 2000 .

[18]  Jerry L. L. Miller,et al.  TESTING A DYNAMIC MODEL OF SOCIAL COMPOSITION: DIVERSITY AND CHANGE IN VOLUNTARY GROUPS* , 1996 .

[19]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  J. M. McPherson,et al.  Measuring the Composition of Voluntary Groups: A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis. , 1995 .

[21]  Carla M. Eastis.  Organizational Diversity and the Production of Social Capital , 1998 .

[22]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[23]  J. N. Edwards,et al.  Voluntary Associations and the Integration Hypothesis , 1965 .

[24]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[25]  Deborah H. Streeter,et al.  The Entrepreneurial Process: Economic Growth, Men, Women, and Minorities , 1997 .

[26]  Barbara F. Reskin,et al.  Sex Segregation in the Workplace , 1993 .

[27]  Julie Siciliano,et al.  The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance , 1996 .

[28]  J. M. McPherson,et al.  Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics , 1992 .

[29]  R. Burt.  A note on social capital and network content , 1997 .

[30]  M. Olsen,et al.  Participatory Pluralism: Political Participation and Influence in the United States and Sweden. , 1983 .

[31]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  Stanley Lieberson,et al.  Measuring Population Diversity , 1969 .

[33]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[34]  James Moody,et al.  Family Matters: Gender, Networks, and Entrepreneurial Outcomes , 2000 .

[35]  H. Ibarra.  Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. , 1992 .

[36]  Beate Völker,et al.  Social Networks of Participants in Voluntary Associations , 2007 .

[37]  J. A. Calvin.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1998 .

[38]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Who Can You Turn To? Tie Activation within Core Business Discussion Networks , 2005 .

[39]  Lynn Smith-Lovin,et al.  Women and Weak Ties: Differences by Sex in the Size of Voluntary Organizations , 1982, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  Nan Lin,et al.  Access to occupations through social ties , 1986 .

[41]  Jennifer L. Glanville.  Voluntary Associations and Social Network Structure: Why Organizational Location and Type Are Important , 2004 .

[42]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. , 1987 .

[43]  Tiago Fernandes.  For the Common Good? American Civic Life and the Golden Age of Fraternity , 2004 .

[44]  Roger V. Gould.  Collective Action and Network Structure , 1993 .

[45]  Karen E. Campbell,et al.  SOCIAL RESOURCES AND SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS , 1986 .

[46]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[47]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  Gender, children, and social contact : The effects of childrearing for men and women , 1997 .

[48]  Entrepreneurial networks and resource acquisition : does gender make a difference? , 1992 .