Conservatism and diversification of plant functional traits: Evolutionary rates versus phylogenetic signal

The concepts of niche conservatism and adaptive radiation have played central roles in the study of evolution and ecological diversification. With respect to phenotypic evolution, the two processes may be seen as opposite ends of a spectrum; however, there is no straightforward method for the comparative analysis of trait evolution that will identify these contrasting scenarios. Analysis of the rate of phenotypic evolution plays an important role in this context and merits increased attention. In this article, independent contrasts are used to estimate rates of evolution for continuous traits under a Brownian motion model of evolution. A unit for the rate of phenotypic diversification is introduced: the felsen, in honor of J. Felsenstein, is defined as an increase of one unit per million years in the variance among sister taxa of ln-transformed trait values. The use of a standardized unit of measurement facilitates comparisons among clades and traits. Rates of diversification of three functional traits (plant height, leaf size, and seed size) were estimated for four to six woody plant clades (Acer, Aesculus, Ceanothus, Arbutoideae, Hawaiian lobeliads, and the silversword alliance) for which calibrated phylogenies were available. For height and leaf size, rates were two to ≈300 times greater in the Hawaiian silversword alliance than in the other clades considered. These results highlight the value of direct estimates of rates of trait evolution for comparative analysis of adaptive radiation, niche conservatism, and trait diversification.

[1]  R. Holt Bringing the Hutchinsonian niche into the 21st century: Ecological and evolutionary perspectives , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  L. Revell,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of the Evolutionary Correlation Using Likelihood , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  Robbert Gradstein New associate editor of TAXON , 2009 .

[4]  Q. Xiang,et al.  Phylogeny, origin, and biogeographic history of Aesculus L. (Sapindales) - an update from combined analysis of DNA sequences, morphology, and fossils , 2009 .

[5]  James F. Smith,et al.  Origin, adaptive radiation and diversification of the Hawaiian lobeliads (Asterales: Campanulaceae) , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Margaret E K Evans,et al.  Climate, Niche Evolution, and Diversification of the “Bird‐Cage” Evening Primroses (Oenothera, Sections Anogra and Kleinia) , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[7]  J. Losos Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[8]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Rooting and dating maples (Acer) with an uncorrelated-rates molecular clock: implications for north American/Asian disjunctions. , 2008, Systematic biology.

[9]  L. Revell,et al.  Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. , 2008, Systematic biology.

[10]  J. Felsenstein Comparative Methods with Sampling Error and Within‐Species Variation: Contrasts Revisited and Revised , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[11]  C. Marshall A Simple Method for Bracketing Absolute Divergence Times on Molecular Phylogenies Using Multiple Fossil Calibration Points , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[12]  J. Hardin Studies in the Hippocastanaceae, V. Species of the old world , 1960, Brittonia.

[13]  J. Hardin A revision of the American Hippocastanaceae-II , 1957, Brittonia.

[14]  J. Hardin A revision of the American Hippocastanaceae , 2008, Brittonia.

[15]  D. Ackerly,et al.  A trait-based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within- and among-community components. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[16]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  Resolving the Paradox of Stasis: Models with Stabilizing Selection Explain Evolutionary Divergence on All Timescales , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[17]  A. Pitman,et al.  Global patterns in seed size , 2006 .

[18]  C. Yesson,et al.  Phyloclimatic modeling: combining phylogenetics and bioclimatic modeling. , 2006, Systematic biology.

[19]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Niche evolution and adaptive radiation: testing the order of trait divergence. , 2006, Ecology.

[20]  Michael J. Sanderson,et al.  TESTING FOR DIFFERENT RATES OF CONTINUOUS TRAIT EVOLUTION USING LIKELIHOOD , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  William G. Lee,et al.  Modulation of leaf economic traits and trait relationships by climate , 2005 .

[22]  D. Collar,et al.  COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MORPHOLOGICAL DIVERSITY: DOES DISPARITY ACCUMULATE AT THE SAME RATE IN TWO LINEAGES OF CENTRARCHID FISHES? , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics , 2005 .

[24]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  A Brief History of Seed Size , 2005, Science.

[25]  D. Ackerly,et al.  Evolutionary Diversification of Continuous Traits: Phylogenetic Tests and Application to Seed Size in the California Flora , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[26]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  Population dynamics and evolutionary processes: the manifold roles of habitat selection , 1987, Evolutionary Ecology.

[27]  A. King,et al.  Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis: A Modeling Approach for Adaptive Evolution , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[28]  M. Sanderson,et al.  Assessing the quality of molecular divergence time estimates by fossil calibrations and fossil-based model selection. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[29]  C. Ciampaglio Measuring changes in articulate brachiopod morphology before and after the Permian mass extinction event: do developmental constraints limit morphological innovation? , 2004, Evolution & development.

[30]  J. Cavender-Bares,et al.  Phylogenetic Overdispersion in Floridian Oak Communities , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[31]  D. Ackerly,et al.  Adaptation, Niche Conservatism, and Convergence: Comparative Studies of Leaf Evolution in the California Chaparral , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[32]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[33]  J. Losos,et al.  Tempo and Mode of Evolutionary Radiation in Iguanian Lizards , 2003, Science.

[34]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches , 2003 .

[35]  M. Westoby,et al.  Plant height and evolutionary games , 2003 .

[36]  D. Ackerly Community Assembly, Niche Conservatism, and Adaptive Evolution in Changing Environments , 2003, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[37]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[39]  T. Garland,et al.  Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods , 2002 .

[40]  Phylogeny and Biogeography of the Arbutoideae (Ericaceae): Implications for the Madrean-Tethyan Hypothesis , 2009 .

[41]  Mark W. Chase,et al.  Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Julie R. Etterson,et al.  Constraint to Adaptive Evolution in Response to Global Warming , 2001, Science.

[43]  M. Sanderson,et al.  ABSOLUTE DIVERSIFICATION RATES IN ANGIOSPERM CLADES , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  Jacob McC. Overton,et al.  Shifts in trait‐combinations along rainfall and phosphorus gradients , 2000 .

[45]  Richard H. Ree,et al.  Homoplasy and Developmental Constraint: A Model and an Example from Plants1 , 2000 .

[46]  C W Cunningham,et al.  INDEPENDENT CONTRASTS SUCCEED WHERE ANCESTOR RECONSTRUCTION FAILS IN A KNOWN BACTERIOPHAGE PHYLOGENY , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  J. Sperry,et al.  Vulnerability to xylem cavitation and the distribution of Sonoran Desert vegetation. , 1996, American journal of botany.

[48]  D. Schluter,et al.  The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation , 2000 .

[49]  D. Soltis,et al.  Diversification of the North American shrub genus Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae): conflicting phylogenies from nuclear ribosomal DNA and chloroplast DNA. , 2000, American journal of botany.

[50]  M. Westoby,et al.  The Evolutionary ecology of seed size , 2000 .

[51]  M. Pagel Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution , 1999, Nature.

[52]  William L. Wagner,et al.  Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawai'i , 1999 .

[53]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Leaf Size, Sapling Allometry, and Corner's Rules: Phylogeny and Correlated Evolution in Maples (Acer) , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[54]  M. Sanderson,et al.  Age and rate of diversification of the Hawaiian silversword alliance (Compositae). , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  D. Schluter,et al.  LIKELIHOOD OF ANCESTOR STATES IN ADAPTIVE RADIATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[56]  T. F. Hansen STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ADAPTATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[57]  A. Liston,et al.  Molecular phylogeny of the genus Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae) using rbc L and ndh F sequences , 1997, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[58]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  Phylogenies and the Comparative Method: A General Approach to Incorporating Phylogenetic Information into the Analysis of Interspecific Data , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[59]  R. Gomulkiewicz,et al.  How Does Immigration Influence Local Adaptation? A Reexamination of a Familiar Paradigm , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[60]  Emília P. Martins,et al.  Estimating the Rate of Phenotypic Evolution from Comparative Data , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[61]  J. C. Hickman,et al.  The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California , 1993 .

[62]  E. Martins The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology, Paul H. Harvey, Mark D. Pagel. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991), vii, + 239 Price $24.95 paperback , 1992 .

[63]  T. Garland Rate Tests for Phenotypic Evolution Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[64]  A. Bradshaw The Croonian Lecture, 1991. Genostasis and the limits to evolution. , 1991, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[65]  M. Lynch METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF COMPARATIVE DATA IN EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[66]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[67]  P. Gingerich Rates of Evolution: Effects of Time and Temporal Scaling , 1983, Science.

[68]  J. Thoday,et al.  Evolution of Niche Width , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[69]  H. G. Baker Seed Weight in Relation to Environmental Conditions in California , 1972 .

[70]  J. Haldane SUGGESTIONS AS TO QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENT OF RATES OF EVOLUTION , 1949, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[71]  K. Strøm The Ecological Niche , 1946, Nature.

[72]  BY D. F. PARKHURSTt OPTIMAL LEAF SIZE IN RELATION TO ENVIRONMENT * , 2022 .