Sensitive periods differentiate processing of open- and closed-class words: an ERP study of bilinguals.

The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that neural processes for language are heterogeneous in their adaptations to maturation and experience. This study examined whether the neural processes for open- and closed-class words are differentially affected by delays in second-language immersion. In English, open-class words primarily convey referential meaning, whereas closed-class words are primarily related to grammatical information in sentence processing. Previous studies indicate that event-related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited by these word classes display nonidentical distributions and latencies, show different developmental time courses, and are differentially affected by early language experience in Deaf individuals. In this study, ERPs were recorded from 10 monolingual English speakers and 53 Chinese-English bilingual speakers who were grouped according to their age of immersion in English: 1-3, 4-6, 7-10, 11-13, and >15 years of age. Closed-class words elicited an N280 that was largest over left anterior electrode sites for all groups. However, the peak latency was later (>35 ms) in bilingual speakers immersed in English after 7 years of age. In contrast, the latencies and distributions of the N350 elicited by open-class words were similar in all groups. In addition, the N400, elicited by semantic anomalies (open-class words that violated semantic expectation), displayed increased peak latencies for only the later-learning bilingual speakers (>11 years). These results are consistent with the hypothesis that language subprocesses are differentially sensitive to the timing of second-language experience.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  D. C. Howell.  Statistical methods for psychology, 3rd ed. , 1992 .

[3]  D F Stegeman,et al.  Electrophysiological manifestations of open- and closed-class words in patients with Broca's aphasia with agrammatic comprehension. An event-related brain potential study. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  A. Szentkuti,et al.  Differences in brain potentials to open and closed class words: class and frequency effects , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Paul W. B. Atkins,et al.  Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. , 1993 .

[6]  D. C. Howell.  Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[7]  A. Friederici,et al.  Processing a second language: Late learners''comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related b , 2001 .

[8]  Yuping Wang,et al.  Brain potentials during mental arithmetic-effects of problem difficulty on event-related brain potentials , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  R. Lindman.  Self-Ratings and Linguistic Proficiency in Bilingual Subjects , 1977, Language and speech.

[10]  H. Jasper.  Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography , 1958 .

[11]  E. Smith,et al.  Multiple sensitive periods in the development of the primate visual system. , 1986, Science.

[12]  H. Neville.  Developmental specificity in neurocognitive development in humans. , 1995 .

[13]  Welch Bl.  THE GENERALIZATION OF ‘STUDENT'S’ PROBLEM WHEN SEVERAL DIFFERENT POPULATION VARLANCES ARE INVOLVED , 1947 .

[14]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Electrophysiological Signatures of Visual Lexical Processing: Open-and Closed-Class Words , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Brain processing of native and foreign languages. , 1996 .

[16]  H. Neville,et al.  The Neurobiology of Sensory and Language Processing in Language-Impaired Children , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  V Bettinardi,et al.  The bilingual brain. Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages , 1997, Nature.

[19]  M. Chee,et al.  Mandarin and English Single Word Processing Studied with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[21]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[22]  H. Neville,et al.  Maturational Constraints on Functional Specializations for Language Processing: ERP and Behavioral Evidence in Bilingual Speakers , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[24]  A D Friederici,et al.  Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[25]  U. Bellugi,et al.  Neural Systems Mediating American Sign Language: Effects of Sensory Experience and Age of Acquisition , 1997, Brain and Language.

[26]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Language Comprehension , 1988 .

[27]  D. Caplan,et al.  Processing of Visually Presented Sentences in Mandarin and English Studied with fMRI , 1999, Neuron.

[28]  D Bavelier,et al.  Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: biological constraints and effects of experience. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  J. S. Johnson,et al.  Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  H. Neville,et al.  Fractionating language: different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  A. Friederici.  Children’s sensitivity to function words during sentence comprehension , 1983 .

[32]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics , 1983, Cognition.