Ultrathin-Strut Versus Thin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents for Primary PCI: A Subgroup Analysis of the BIOSTEMI Randomized Trial.
暂无分享,去创建一个
S. Windecker | M. Valgimigli | O. Muller | M. Roffi | T. Pilgrim | S. Losdat | D. Kurz | J. Iglesias | D. Weilenmann | C. Kaiser
[1] A. Roguin,et al. Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[2] M. Zwahlen,et al. Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (BIOSTEMI): a single-blind, prospective, randomised superiority trial , 2019, The Lancet.
[3] G. Stone,et al. Newer-Generation Ultrathin Strut Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Older Second-Generation Thicker Strut Drug-Eluting Stents for Coronary Artery Disease: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials , 2018, Circulation.
[4] Marco Roffi,et al. Ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent for percutaneous coronary revascularisation (BIOSCIENCE): a randomised, single-blind, non-inferiority trial , 2014, The Lancet.