Fault-tolerant detection of a quantum error

Fault-tolerant quantum coding Noise and imperfections in a quantum system can result in the presence and propagation of errors through the system. A reliable quantum processor will need to be able to correct for these errors and error syndromes. Rosenblum et al. used higher quantum states of a superconducting-based quantum circuit to demonstrate a method for the fault-tolerant measurement of an error-correctable logical qubit. Such fault-tolerant measurements will allow more frequent interrogations of the state of the logical qubit, ultimately leading to the implementation of more quantum operations and more complex entangled quantum circuits. Science, this issue p. 266 A fault-tolerant measurement protocol is demonstrated with an error-correctable logical qubit. A critical component of any quantum error–correcting scheme is detection of errors by using an ancilla system. However, errors occurring in the ancilla can propagate onto the logical qubit, irreversibly corrupting the encoded information. We demonstrate a fault-tolerant error-detection scheme that suppresses spreading of ancilla errors by a factor of 5, while maintaining the assignment fidelity. The same method is used to prevent propagation of ancilla excitations, increasing the logical qubit dephasing time by an order of magnitude. Our approach is hardware-efficient, as it uses a single multilevel transmon ancilla and a cavity-encoded logical qubit, whose interaction is engineered in situ by using an off-resonant sideband drive. The results demonstrate that hardware-efficient approaches that exploit system-specific error models can yield advances toward fault-tolerant quantum computation.

[1]  Daniel Gottesman,et al.  Quantum fault tolerance in small experiments , 2016, 1610.03507.

[2]  Eliot Kapit,et al.  Error-Transparent Quantum Gates for Small Logical Qubit Architectures. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[3]  E. Knill,et al.  Resilient quantum computation: error models and thresholds , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  Mazyar Mirrahimi,et al.  Hardware-efficient autonomous quantum memory protection. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[5]  Liang Jiang,et al.  A CNOT gate between multiphoton qubits encoded in two cavities , 2017, Nature Communications.

[6]  M. Mariantoni,et al.  Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation , 2012, 1208.0928.

[7]  S. Girvin,et al.  Deterministically Encoding Quantum Information Using 100-Photon Schrödinger Cat States , 2013, Science.

[8]  Victor V. Albert,et al.  Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation , 2013, 1312.2017.

[9]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  Experimental Demonstration of Fault-Tolerant State Preparation with Superconducting Qubits. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[10]  J. Gambetta,et al.  Superconducting qubit in a waveguide cavity with a coherence time approaching 0.1 ms , 2012, 1202.5533.

[11]  Andrew A. Houck,et al.  Suppression of photon shot noise dephasing in a tunable coupling superconducting qubit , 2016, 1603.01224.

[12]  Zagury,et al.  Quantum nondemolition measurement of small photon numbers by Rydberg-atom phase-sensitive detection. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[13]  Mazyar Mirrahimi,et al.  Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in superconducting circuits , 2016, Nature.

[14]  R. J. Schoelkopf,et al.  Tracking photon jumps with repeated quantum non-demolition parity measurements , 2013, Nature.

[15]  Caroline Figgatt,et al.  Fault-tolerant quantum error detection , 2016, Science Advances.

[16]  S. Berger,et al.  Microwave-Induced Amplitude and Phase Tunable Qubit-Resonator Coupling in Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics , 2015, 1502.03692.

[17]  Matthias Ernst,et al.  Operator-based Floquet theory in solid-state NMR. , 2010, Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance.

[18]  Panos Aliferis,et al.  Subsystem fault tolerance with the Bacon-Shor code. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[19]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Decoherence-Free Subspaces for Quantum Computation , 1998, quant-ph/9807004.

[20]  Bryan Eastin,et al.  Restrictions on transversal encoded quantum gate sets. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[21]  DiVincenzo,et al.  Fault-Tolerant Error Correction with Efficient Quantum Codes. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[22]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.