A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature (1994-2008)

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to conduct a scientometric analysis of the body of literature contained in 11 major knowledge management and intellectual capital (KM/IC) peer-reviewed journals. Design/methodology/approach – A total of 2,175 articles published in 11 major KM/IC peer-reviewed journals were carefully reviewed and subjected to scientometric data analysis techniques. Findings – A number of research questions pertaining to country, institutional and individual productivity, co-operation patterns, publication frequency, and favourite inquiry methods were proposed and answered. Based on the findings, many implications emerged that improve one’s understanding of the identity of KM/IC as a distinct scientific field. Research limitations/implications – The pool of KM/IC journals examined did not represent all available publication outlets, given that at least 20 peer-reviewed journals exist in the KM/IC field. There are also KM/IC papers published in other non-KM/IC specific journals. However, the 11 journals that were selected for the study have been evaluated by Bontis and Serenko as the top publications in the KM/IC area. Practical implications – Practitioners have played a significant role in developing the KM/IC field. However, their contributions have been decreasing. There is still very much a need for qualitative descriptions and case studies. It is critically important that practitioners consider collaborating with academics for richer research projects. Originality/value – This is the most comprehensive scientometric analysis of the KM/IC field ever conducted.

[1]  Edgar H. Sibley,et al.  A profile of information systems research published in Information & Management , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[2]  Maria Jakubik,et al.  Becoming to know. Shifting the knowledge creation paradigm , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[3]  Peter W. Hart,et al.  Relationship between growth in gross domestic product (GDP) and growth in the chemical engineering literature in five different countries , 1998, Scientometrics.

[4]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Beyond Rigor and Relevance Towards Responsibility and Reverberation: Information Systems Research That Really Matters , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Linda M. Manning,et al.  Research Performance Management in Academe , 2009 .

[6]  Nick Bontis,et al.  A scientometric analysis of the Proceedings of the McMaster World Congress on the Management of Intellectual Capital and Innovation for the 1996‐2008 period , 2009 .

[7]  Ronald Dattero.  Collaboration between the top knowledge management and intellectual capital researchers , 2006 .

[8]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Measuring Researcher-Production in Information Systems , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Francis Narin,et al.  Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers , 1991, Scientometrics.

[10]  Jeanne D. Day,et al.  Individual Productivity and Impact in Developmental Psychology , 1995 .

[11]  Nick Bontis,et al.  Teaching knowledge management and intellectual capital lessons: an empirical examination of the Tango simulation , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[12]  R. Merton,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1975, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

[13]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  The Pulse of Multiparticipant Systems , 2008, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[14]  Robert K. Merton,et al.  Sociological ambivalence and other essays , 1976 .

[15]  Prashant Palvia,et al.  Research Methodologies in MIS: An Update , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Chun Wei Choo,et al.  The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge , 2002 .

[17]  Jane Greenberg,et al.  Open Source Software Development and Lotka's Law: Bibliometric Patterns in Programming , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  D. King.  The scientific impact of nations , 2004, Nature.

[19]  Alex Koohang,et al.  Frequency of Publication and Topical Emphasis of Knowledge Management Books versus Doctoral Dissertations: 1983–2005 , 2005, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[21]  Ellen Bonnevie-Nebelong,et al.  A multifaceted portrait of a library and information science journal: the case of the Journal of Information Science , 2003, J. Inf. Sci..

[22]  Amanat Hussain,et al.  The learning organization , 2000 .

[23]  Nick Bontis,et al.  MBA knowledge management course: is there an impact after graduation? , 2006, Int. J. Knowl. Learn..

[24]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  A Scientometric Study of Information Systems Conferences: Exploring ICIS, PACIS and ASAC , 2009, AMCIS.

[25]  Vesa Peltokorpi,et al.  Objectivity and subjectivity in knowledge management: a review of 20 top articles , 2006 .

[26]  Erhan Erkut,et al.  Measuring Canadian Business School Research Output and Impact , 2009 .

[27]  L. Egghe,et al.  The power of power laws and an interpretation of Lotkaian informetric systems as self-similar fractals , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  András Schubert,et al.  Incremental citation impact due to international co-authorship in Hungarian higher education institutions , 2007, Scientometrics.

[29]  Prashant Palvia,et al.  Management Information Systems Research: What's There in a Methodology? , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Ravinder Nath,et al.  Productivity of management information systems researchers: Does Lotka's law apply? , 1991, Inf. Process. Manag..

[31]  Nick Bontis,et al.  Self-efficacy and KM course weighting selection: can students optimise their grades? , 2008 .

[32]  Raymond A. K. Cox,et al.  Patterns of Productivity in the Finance Literature: A Study of the Bibliometric Distributions , 1990 .

[33]  R. Grant.  The Knowledge-Based View of the Firm , 2006 .

[34]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property , 1988, Isis.

[35]  Michael Wade,et al.  The Value of Scientometric Studies: An Introduction to a Debate on IS as a Reference Discipline , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Yinian Gu,et al.  Global knowledge management research: A bibliometric analysis , 2004, Scientometrics.

[37]  N. Bontis.  Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models , 1998 .

[38]  L. C. Scott,et al.  Trends in Rankings of Economics Departments in the U.S.: An Update , 1996 .

[39]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Research productivity in psychology based on publication in the journals of the American Psychological Association. , 1987 .

[40]  N. Bontis.  National Intellectual Capital Index , 2004 .

[41]  Maria R. Lee,et al.  Revealing research themes and trends in knowledge management: From 1995 to 2010 , 2012, Knowl. Based Syst..

[42]  Nick Bontis,et al.  A follow-up ranking of academic journals , 2009, J. Knowl. Manag..

[43]  J. Michael Pearson,et al.  The Relevancy of Information Systems Research: The Practitioner's View , 2005, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[44]  M. BONITZ,et al.  Characteristics and impact of the matthew effect for countries , 1997, Scientometrics.

[45]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  The scientific wealth of European nations: Taking effectiveness into account , 1998, Scientometrics.

[46]  Anna Sidorova,et al.  Uncovering the Intellectual Core of the Information Systems Discipline , 2008, MIS Q..

[47]  Nick Bontis,et al.  Practical Relevance of Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital Scholarly Research: Books as Knowledge Translation Agents , 2011, AMCIS.

[48]  Richard A. Wright.  Recent changes in the most-cited scholars in criminal justice textbooks , 2002 .

[49]  Victor Kuperman,et al.  Productivity in the Internet mailing lists: A bibliometric analysis , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[50]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Value of Scientometric Studies: An Introduction to a Debate on IS as a Reference Discipline , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Two decades of "Scientometrics". An interdisciplinary field represented by its leading journal , 2004, Scientometrics.

[52]  Vernon J. Richardson,et al.  Assessing Leading Institutions, Faculty, and Articles in Premier Information Systems Research Journals , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  The Development of an AI Journal Ranking List Based on the Revealed Preference Approach , 2010, AMCIS.

[54]  Nick Bontis,et al.  What's familiar is excellent: The impact of exposure effect on perceived journal quality , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[55]  Nick Bontis,et al.  Improving Service Delivery: Investigating the Role of Information Sharing, Job Characteristics, and Employee Satisfaction. , 2011 .

[56]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[57]  Nick Bontis,et al.  CKO wanted — evangelical skills necessary: a review of the Chief Knowledge Officer position , 2001 .

[58]  Souad Mohamed,et al.  Social enterprise and social entrepreneurship research and theory: a bibliometric analysis , 2011 .

[59]  Katy Börner,et al.  Mixed-indicators model for identifying emerging research areas , 2011, Scientometrics.

[60]  Jacob M. Rose.  Discussion of "Do tax decision support systems affect the accuracy of tax compliance decisions?" , 2002, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[61]  N. Bontis.  Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital : framing and advancing the state of the field , 2000 .

[62]  John F. Rockart,et al.  IS Research Relevance Revisited: Subtle Accomplishment, Unfulfilled Promise, or Serial Hypocrisy? , 2002, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[63]  Nick Bontis,et al.  The relevance of knowledge management and intellectual capital Research , 2008 .

[64]  N. Bontis,et al.  Meta-review of knowledge management and intellectual capital literature: citation impact and research productivity rankings , 2004 .

[65]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  The state and evolution of information systems research in canada: a scientometric analysis , 2008 .

[66]  A. Serenko,et al.  Investigating Information Systems Research in Canada , 2012 .

[67]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  The Slippery Slope of MIS Academia: A Discussion of the Quest for Relevance in Our Discipline , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[68]  D. A. King,et al.  The Scientific Impact of Nations: What different countries get for their research spending , 2004 .

[69]  Nick Bontis,et al.  Organizational size and knowledge flow: a proposed theoretical link , 2007 .

[70]  Alfred J. Lotka,et al.  The frequency distribution of scientific productivity , 1926 .

[71]  Omar E. M. Khalil,et al.  Understanding the knowledge management‐intellectual capital relationship: a two‐way analysis , 2011 .

[72]  Yinian Gu.  Information management or knowledge management? An informetric view of the dynamics of Academia , 2004, Scientometrics.

[73]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Author inflation leads to a breakdown of Lotka's law , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[74]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[75]  Ben-Ami Lipetz,et al.  Aspects of JASIS Authorship through Five Decades , 1999, Journal of the American Society for Information Science.

[76]  N. Bontis.  National Intellectual Capital Index : A United Nations Initiative for the Arab Region , 2002 .

[77]  Leonard J. Ponzi.  The intellectual structure and interdisciplinary breadth of Knowledge Management: A bibliometric study of its early stage of development , 2002, Scientometrics.

[78]  N. Bontis.  Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital , 2001 .

[79]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Emerald authorship data, Lotka's law and research productivity , 2005, Aslib Proc..

[80]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[81]  Nick Bontis,et al.  Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals , 2009, J. Knowl. Manag..

[82]  E. Garfield.  Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.

[83]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[84]  Stephen Frosh,et al.  Identity crisis , 2015, Science.