CTA-based screening reduces time to diagnosis and stroke rate in blunt cervical vascular injury.

BACKGROUND Advances in computed tomography capabilities have enabled trauma surgeons to screen for and diagnose the severity of blunt cervical vascular injury (BCVI) using computed tomographic angiography (CTA) alone. We hypothesized that the use of CTA-alone screening and diagnostic methods would reduce the time interval from admission to diagnosis and, hence, also reduce the stroke rates associated with these injuries. METHODS All patients admitted to a level I trauma center after December 1999 at risk for BCVI were screened. Until March 2005, patients were screened with cervical catheter angiography (CA). Subsequently, a CTA-alone screening/diagnostic program was initiated simultaneously with standardized interdisciplinary treatment guidelines for BCVI. Data for controls were subsequently obtained by reviewing trauma registry records. RESULTS Of 3012 trauma service admissions from April 2005 to July 2006, 26 patients were found to have BCVI diagnosed by CTA alone. A standardized, injury grade-based set of treatment guidelines were then initiated immediately based on CTA findings. Time to diagnosis and stroke rate in these patients were then compared with 79 patients found to have BCVI from December 1999 to March 2005 during CA-based screening. There were no differences in sex, mean age, Injury Severity Score, head/neck Abbreviated Injury Scale, or arrival Glasgow Coma Scale between the CA and CTA groups. With CA-based screening, the mean +/- SD time from trauma center admission to diagnosis was 31.2 +/- 41.1 hours. After transition to CTA screening in March 2005, this time was reduced to 2.65 +/- 3.3 hours (p < 0.001). During the era of CA-based screening, the overall stroke rate for BCVI at our institution was 15.2% (n = 12 of 79). After the initiation of CTA-based screening, the stroke rate was reduced to 3.8% (n = 1 of 26, p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS The initiation of a CTA-based screening and diagnostic program, along with interdisciplinary standardized treatment guidelines, reduced the time to diagnosis of BCVI 12-fold and the institutional stroke rate due to BCVI fourfold. This may be due to earlier diagnosis and initiation of definitive therapy.

[1]  T. Fabian,et al.  Antithrombotic therapy and endovascular stents are effective treatment for blunt carotid injuries: results from longterm followup. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[2]  J. Jarvik,et al.  Sixteen-slice CT angiography in patients with suspected blunt carotid and vertebral artery injuries. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[3]  K. Moulakakis,et al.  Covered Stent-Graft Treatment of Traumatic Internal Carotid Artery Pseudoaneurysms: A Review , 2006, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[4]  S. Norwood,et al.  Sixteen-slice multi-detector computed tomographic angiography improves the accuracy of screening for blunt cerebrovascular injury. , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[5]  J. Jarvik,et al.  Screening for blunt cerebrovascular injury: evaluating the accuracy of multidetector computed tomographic angiography. , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  Alexander L. Eastman,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cervical vascular injury: is it ready for primetime? , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  F. Umansky,et al.  Endovascular Stent-Assisted Angioplasty in the Management of Traumatic Internal Carotid Artery Dissections , 2005, Stroke.

[8]  L. Greenfield,et al.  Antiplatelet therapy: an alternative to heparin for blunt carotid injury. , 2002, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  T. Fabian,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: diagnosis and treatment. , 2001, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  E. Moore,et al.  The devastating potential of blunt vertebral arterial injuries. , 2000, Annals of surgery.

[11]  E. Moore,et al.  Optimizing screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[12]  D. Spain,et al.  Blunt carotid artery injuries: difficulties with the diagnosis prior to neurologic event. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[13]  R. Reed,et al.  Blunt vascular injuries of the head and neck: is heparinization necessary? , 1998, The Journal of trauma.

[14]  E. Moore,et al.  The unrecognized epidemic of blunt carotid arterial injuries: early diagnosis improves neurologic outcome. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[15]  T. Fabian,et al.  Blunt carotid injury. Importance of early diagnosis and anticoagulant therapy. , 1996 .

[16]  D. Diamond,et al.  Blunt carotid injury: reassessing the role of anticoagulation. , 1996, The American surgeon.

[17]  B. Mokri Traumatic and spontaneous extracranial internal carotid artery dissections , 1990, Journal of Neurology.

[18]  T. Fabian,et al.  Carotid artery trauma: management based on mechanism of injury. , 1989, The Journal of trauma.

[19]  A. Livingstone,et al.  Vascular injuries of the head and neck. , 1983, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[20]  N. Hertzer,et al.  Blunt Carotid Artery Trauma Report of Two Cases and Review of the Literature , 1980, Annals of surgery.

[21]  J. Youmans,et al.  Carotid artery occlusion due to nonpenetrating injury. , 1967, The Journal of trauma.