Early project based learning improvements via a "star trek engineering room" game framework, and competition

In this work, we show how providing a constrained project framework for a second year digital design course improves the number of working student projects from 55% to 86%. Instead of an open-ended project as in previous years, we introduce an optional project framework, called "Redhawk Duels". Redhawk Duels is a game framework in which students design control algorithms and interfaces for a virtual ship. Once a competition begins, two opposing groups and their respective ships attempt to incapacitate the opposing ship by finding the opponent, shooting them, and budgeting their energy accordingly. Fifteen of the twenty-one groups in the 2010 class participated in Redhawk Duels for their final project, and 86% of these projects were working and demonstrated with sufficient complexity. The remaining six groups chose to implement open-ended projects and had a 66% success rate. This rate is similar to the 55% success rate of the 2009 class which were all open-ended projects. We surveyed the students involved to see how they felt the project helped them and how much they enjoyed the activity. The results show that the students strongly agree that participating in the framework motivated them and will help them in future engineering design projects.

[1]  Jay R Goldberg.  Preparing students for capstone design [Senior Design]. , 2009, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[2]  José Nelson Amaral,et al.  Teaching digital design to computing science students in a single academic term , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[3]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2006 .

[4]  Pedro U. Lima,et al.  Mobile robot competitions: fostering advances in research, development and education in robotics , 2000 .

[5]  Chris Rogers,et al.  Gender differences in confidence levels, group interactions, and feelings about competition in an introductory robotics course , 2002, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education.

[6]  Yi Zhu,et al.  Enhancing Learning Effectiveness in Digital Design Courses Through the Use of Programmable Logic Boards , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[7]  Shawki Areibi.  A first course in digital design using VHDL and programmable logic , 2001, 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37193).

[8]  Amanda B. Diekman,et al.  Seeking Congruity Between Goals and Roles , 2010, Psychological science.

[9]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Using Robot Competitions to Promote Intellectual Development , 2000, AI Mag..

[10]  Charles J. Lesko.  Building a framework for the senior capstone experience in an information computer technology program , 2009, SIGITE '09.

[11]  Javier Macías Guarasa,et al.  A project-based learning approach to design electronic systems curricula , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[12]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh.  Robot Diaries: Creative technology fluency for middle school girls [Education] , 2009, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[13]  Henrik Hautop Lund,et al.  Robotics as an educational tool , 1999 .

[14]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project‐Oriented Capstone Courses , 1997 .

[15]  Tyson S. Hall,et al.  An introductory digital design course using a low-cost autonomous robot , 2002, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[16]  Billy V. Koen,et al.  Toward a Strategy for Teaching Engineering Design , 1994 .

[17]  Daniel C. Cliburn,et al.  Student preferences between open-ended and structured game assignments in CS1 , 2010, 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[18]  M. D. Takach,et al.  Improving an introductory course on digital logic , 1995, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century.