Muscle activity determined by cosine tuning with a nontrivial preferred direction during isometric force exertion by lower limb.

We investigated how the CNS selects a unique muscle activation pattern under a redundant situation resulting from the existence of bi-articular muscles. Surface electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from eight lower limb muscles while 11 subjects were exerting isometric knee and hip joint torque simultaneously (T(k) and T(h), respectively. Extension torque was defined as positive). The knee joint was kept at either 90 or 60 degrees. Various combinations of torque were imposed on both joints by pulling a cable attached to an ankle brace with approximately three levels of isometric force in 16 directions. The distribution of the data in the three-dimensional plot (muscle activation level quantified by the root mean squared value of EMG vs. T(k) and T(h)) demonstrates that the muscle activation level M can be approximated by a single model as M = left flooraT(k) + bT(h) right floor where left floorx right floor = max (x,0) and a and b are constants. The percentage of variance explained by this model averaged over all muscles was 82.3 +/- 14.0% (mean +/- SD), indicating that the degree of fit of the data to the plane was high. This model suggests that the CNS uses a cosine tuning function on the torque plane (T(k), T(h)) to recruit muscles. Interestingly, the muscle's preferred direction (PD) defined as the direction where it is maximally active on the torque plane deviated from its own mechanical pulling direction (MD). This deviation was apparent in the mono-articular knee extensor (MD = 0 degrees , whereas PD = 14.1 +/- 3.7 degrees for vastus lateralis) and in the mono-articular hip extensor (MD = 90 degrees, whereas PD = 53.4 +/- 6.4 degrees for gluteus maximus). Such misalignment between MD and PD indicates that the mono-articular muscle's activation level depends on the torque of the joint that it does not span. Practical implications of this observation for the motor control studies were discussed. We also demonstrated that the observed shift from the MD to the PD is plausible in the configuration of our musculo-skeletal system and that the experimental results are likely to be explained by the CNS process to minimize the variability of the endpoint force vector under the existence of signal-dependent noise.

[1]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  A Seireg,et al.  A mathematical model for evaluation of forces in lower extremeties of the musculo-skeletal system. , 1973, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  S. Scott,et al.  Neural activity in primary motor cortex related to mechanical loads applied to the shoulder and elbow during a postural task. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[5]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  C. Gielen,et al.  Coordination and inhomogeneous activation of human arm muscles during isometric torques. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning , 1998, Nature.

[8]  R Happee,et al.  The control of shoulder muscles during goal directed movements, an inverse dynamic analysis. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  G. J. van Ingen Schenau,et al.  Control of an external force in leg extensions in humans. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Ashvin Shah,et al.  A computational model of muscle recruitment for wrist movements. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[13]  C. Gielen,et al.  Coordination of arm muscles during flexion and supination: Application of the tensor analysis approach , 1986, Neuroscience.

[14]  S. Scott Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  G E Loeb,et al.  The computation of position sense from spindles in mono- and multiarticular muscles , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  W Herzog,et al.  Analytic analysis of the force sharing among synergistic muscles in one- and two-degree-of-freedom models. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Dinh Van Huynh,et al.  Algebra and Its Applications , 2006 .

[18]  U Herrmann,et al.  Directional Tuning of Single Motor Units , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  C. Gielen,et al.  Activation patterns of mono‐ and bi‐articular arm muscles as a function of force and movement direction of the wrist in humans , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  B I Prilutsky,et al.  Coordination of two- and one-joint muscles: functional consequences and implications for motor control. , 2000, Motor control.

[21]  G. J. van Ingen Schenau,et al.  The constrained control of force and position in multi-joint movements , 1992, Neuroscience.

[22]  A. Hof,et al.  The force resulting from the action of mono- and biarticular muscles in a limb. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Tatsuyuki Ohtsuki,et al.  Hysteresis in corticospinal excitability during gradual muscle contraction and relaxation in humans , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Kimitaka Nakazawa,et al.  Fractal correlation in human H-reflex , 1990, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Stan C. A. M. Gielen,et al.  A comparison of models explaining muscle activation patterns for isometric contractions , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[26]  B. P. Yeo Investigations concerning the principle of minimal total muscular force. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  W. Rymer,et al.  Strategies for muscle activation during isometric torque generation at the human elbow. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  C. Marsden,et al.  Frequency peaks of tremor, muscle vibration and electromyographic activity at 10 Hz, 20 Hz and 40 Hz during human finger muscle contraction may reflect rhythmicities of central neural firing , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Step-tracking movements of the wrist. IV. Muscle activity associated with movements in different directions. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Audra E. Kosh,et al.  Linear Algebra and its Applications , 1992 .

[31]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Muscle and movement representations in the primary motor cortex. , 1999, Science.

[32]  J V Basmajian,et al.  Electromyographic study of two-joint muscles. , 1975, American journal of physical medicine.

[33]  S. Scott,et al.  Dissociation between hand motion and population vectors from neural activity in motor cortex , 2022 .

[34]  Emanuel Todorov,et al.  Cosine Tuning Minimizes Motor Errors , 2002, Neural Computation.

[35]  Gerrit Jan van Ingen Schenau,et al.  Intermuscular co-ordination during fast contact control leg tasks in man , 1997, Brain Research.

[36]  David G. Luenberger,et al.  Linear and nonlinear programming , 1984 .

[37]  M. Flanders,et al.  Arm muscle activation for static forces in three-dimensional space. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd Edition , 1992 .

[39]  V. Edgerton,et al.  Muscle architecture of the human lower limb. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.