Effects of alternative follow-up procedures on mail survey response rates.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Don A. Dillman,et al. INCREASING MAIL QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSE IN LARGE SAMPLES OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC , 1972 .
[2] R. Parsons,et al. THE EFFECT OF ADVANCE NOTICE IN MAIL SURVEYS OF HOMOGENEOUS GROUPS , 1972 .
[3] L. M. Aleamoni,et al. Effect of Personal Signature on the Initial Rate of Return of a Mailed Questionnaire. , 1971 .
[4] J. B. Kernan. ARE “BULK-RATE OCCUPANTS” REALLY UNRESPONSIVE? , 1971 .
[5] J. R. Hochstim,et al. PERSONAL FOLLOW-UP IN A MAIL SURVEY: ITS CONTRIBUTION AND ITS COST , 1970 .
[6] Alan R. Andreasen. PERSONALIZING MAIL QUESTIONNAIRE CORRESPONDENCE , 1970 .
[7] Neil M. Ford. The Advance Letter in Mail Surveys , 1967 .
[8] James E. Stafford. Influence of Preliminary Contact on Mail Returns , 1966 .
[9] Thomas R. Wotruba,et al. Monetary Inducements and Mail Questionnaire Response , 1966 .
[10] E. G. Francel. Mail-Administered Questionnaires: A Success Story , 1966 .
[11] Maryline Meyer,et al. TIMING POSTCARD FOLLOW-UPS IN MAIL-QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEYS , 1966 .
[12] Morton L. Brown. USE OF A POSTCARD QUERY IN MAIL SURVEYS , 1965 .
[13] W. Kephart,et al. Increasing the Responses to Mail Questionnaires: A Research Study , 1958 .