Spatial-temporal variability of radiomic features and its effect on the classification of lung cancer histology

The purpose of this research was to study the sensitivity of Computed Tomography (CT) radiomic features to motion blurring and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), and investigate its downstream effect regarding the classification of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) histology. Forty-three radiomic features were considered and classified into one of four categories: Morphological, Intensity, Fine Texture, and Coarse Texture. First, a series of simulations were used to study feature-sensitivity to changes in spatial-temporal resolution. A dynamic digital phantom was used to generate images with different breathing amplitudes and SNR, from which features were extracted and characterized relative to initial simulation conditions. Stage I NSCLC patients were then retrospectively identified, from which three different acquisition-specific feature-spaces were generated based on free-breathing (FB), average-intensity-projection (AIP), and end-of-exhalation (EOE) CT images. These feature-spaces were derived to cover a wide range of spatial-temporal tradeoff. Normalized percent differences and concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) were used to assess the variability between the 3D and 4D acquisition techniques. Subsequently, three corresponding acquisition-specific logistic regression models were developed to classify lung tumor histology. Classification performance was compared between the different data-dependent models. Simulation results demonstrated strong linear dependences (p  >  0.95) between respiratory motion and morphological features, as well as between SNR and texture features. The feature Short Run Emphasis was found to be particularly stable to both motion blurring and changes in SNR. When comparing FB-to-EOE, 37% of features demonstrated high CCC agreement (CCC  >  0.8), compared to only 30% for FB-to-AIP. In classifying tumor histology, EoE images achieved an average AUC, Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Specificity of [Formula: see text], respectively. FB images achieved respective values of [Formula: see text], and AIP images achieved respective values of [Formula: see text]. Several radiomic features have been identified as being relatively robust to spatial-temporal variations based on both simulation data and patient data. In general, features that were sensitive to motion blurring were not necessarily the same features that were sensitive to changes in SNR. Our modeling results suggest that the EoE phase of a 4DCT acquisition may provide useful radiomic information, particularly for features that are highly sensitive to respiratory motion.

[1]  Jinzhong Yang,et al.  Measuring Computed Tomography Scanner Variability of Radiomics Features , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[2]  Andre Dekker,et al.  Radiomics: the process and the challenges. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  F. Yin,et al.  Uncertainties of 4-dimensional computed tomography-based tumor motion measurement for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. , 2014, Practical radiation oncology.

[4]  Benjamin Haibe-Kains,et al.  Radiomic feature clusters and Prognostic Signatures specific for Lung and Head & Neck cancer , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[5]  D Baltas,et al.  Significance of the impact of motion compensation on the variability of PET image features , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  P. Lambin,et al.  Exploratory Study to Identify Radiomics Classifiers for Lung Cancer Histology , 2016, Front. Oncol..

[7]  Fei Yang,et al.  Quantitative radiomics: impact of stochastic effects on textural feature analysis implies the need for standards , 2015, Journal of medical imaging.

[8]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Estimating 4D‐CBCT from prior information and extremely limited angle projections using structural PCA and weighted free‐form deformation for lung radiotherapy , 2017, Medical physics.

[9]  Xiaoou Tang,et al.  Texture information in run-length matrices , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[10]  Robert J. Gillies,et al.  Developing a classifier model for lung tumors in CT-scan images , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[11]  Joseph Y. Lo,et al.  Design, fabrication, and implementation of voxel-based 3D printed textured phantoms for task-based image quality assessment in CT , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  W. Segars,et al.  4D XCAT phantom for multimodality imaging research. , 2010, Medical physics.

[13]  C. Sima,et al.  Immunohistochemical algorithm for differentiation of lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma based on large series of whole-tissue sections with validation in small specimens , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[14]  W. Travis,et al.  Pathology of lung cancer. , 2011, Clinics in chest medicine.

[15]  W. Tsai,et al.  Exploring Variability in CT Characterization of Tumors: A Preliminary Phantom Study. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[16]  Sang Joon Park,et al.  Impact of Reconstruction Algorithms on CT Radiomic Features of Pulmonary Tumors: Analysis of Intra- and Inter-Reader Variability and Inter-Reconstruction Algorithm Variability , 2016, PloS one.

[17]  Geoffrey G. Zhang,et al.  Variability of Image Features Computed from Conventional and Respiratory-Gated PET/CT Images of Lung Cancer , 2015, Translational oncology.

[18]  W. Tsai,et al.  Reproducibility of radiomics for deciphering tumor phenotype with imaging , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[19]  W. Youden,et al.  Index for rating diagnostic tests , 1950, Cancer.

[20]  Chintan Parmar,et al.  Associations of Radiomic Data Extracted from Static and Respiratory-Gated CT Scans with Disease Recurrence in Lung Cancer Patients Treated with SBRT , 2017, PloS one.

[21]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Repeatability of Radiomic Features in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [18F]FDG-PET/CT Studies: Impact of Reconstruction and Delineation , 2016, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[22]  P. Lambin,et al.  Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: An integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability , 2013, Acta oncologica.

[23]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[24]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.

[25]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  4DCT imaging to assess radiomics feature stability: An investigation for thoracic cancers. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[26]  O. Riesterer,et al.  Stability of radiomic features in CT perfusion maps , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Quantum noise properties of CT images with anatomical textured backgrounds across reconstruction algorithms: FBP and SAFIRE. , 2014, Medical physics.

[28]  Peter Balter,et al.  Can radiomics features be reproducibly measured from CBCT images for patients with non-small cell lung cancer? , 2015, Medical physics.

[29]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Prediction of clinical phenotypes in invasive breast carcinomas from the integration of radiomics and genomics data , 2015, Journal of medical imaging.

[30]  P. Lambin,et al.  Robust Radiomics Feature Quantification Using Semiautomatic Volumetric Segmentation , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.