Digital image processing of chest radiographs to compensate for the limitations of video displays

The acceptance of digital workstations as primary diagnostic devices for chest radiographs will be precluded if there is a reduction in the radiologist's accuracy of diagnosis compared to that achieved with conventional screen-film images. Reduction in diagnostic efficacy is believed to be partially due to a reduction in contrast resolution on video monitors. We present the results of a pilot study that tests the ability of the contrast-enhancement algorithm artifact-suppressed adaptive histogram equalization (ASAHE) to compensate for reduced contrast resolution. The ASAHE algorithm is compared to a computed radiographic algorithm that previously delivered observer performance inferior to conventional screen-film images. The algorithms are compared on the basis of five readers interpreting an image set consisting of 45 dllnical cases, 23 of which are confirmed as demonstrating pneumothoraces. Detection efficacy, measured by the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, is not significantly different for the two algorithms. The average ROC curves for the algorithms have different shapes, suggesting that the ASAHE algorithm is affecting diagnostic performance in a way that is not well understood. The results of the pilot study indicate that a test with higher statistical power would need to be performed using this algorithm to form a final estimate of its usefulness.

[1]  B J Hillman,et al.  Detection of pneumothorax: comparison of digital and conventional chest imaging. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  G W Seeley,et al.  Total digital radiology department: spatial resolution requirements. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  J Rosenman,et al.  Automatic digital contrast enhancement of radiotherapy films. , 1987, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  D. Bamber The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph , 1975 .

[5]  Karin M. Hartzell,et al.  A Psychophysical Comparison of Two Methods for Adaptive Histogram Equalization , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[6]  L L Fajardo,et al.  Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  John D. Austin,et al.  Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations , 1987 .

[8]  G W Seeley,et al.  Design and testing of artifact-suppressed adaptive histogram equalization: a contrast-enhancement technique for display of digital chest radiographs. , 1990, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[9]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[10]  P M Lams,et al.  Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs: an ROC study of observer performance in selected cases. , 1986, Radiology.