Coherence Analysis of National Maritime Policy of Pakistan Across Shipping Sector Governance Framework in the Context of Sustainability

Sustainable maritime development needs coherent governance, particularly for the shipping sector, to ensure a stable maritime economy. However, maritime governance in Pakistan is considered inadequate and incoherent and thus poses a serious challenge to sustainability. The National Maritime Policy (NMP) was launched two decades ago, in 2002, to provide an overarching governance framework for long-term benefits, but it is now outdated. This study aimed at analyzing the extent to which the NMP of 2002 is coherent with provincial, national, and international obligations and addresses emerging requirements for the development of a sustainable shipping sector in Pakistan. An analytical framework based on three (03) guiding principles, seven (07) criteria, and twenty-eight (28) indicators was employed using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. Coherence across twenty-one (21) governing instruments was analyzed, scored (0–5), and rated on a ratio scale to represent the coherence index for each indicator. Thus, a matrix representing the coherence index score for each indicator individually and in pairwise comparison with the NMP was developed. An overall coherence index was calculated as 2.1, which shows poor coherence across governing instruments. This indicates that the NMP 2002 is unable to address emerging governance needs for sustainability issues such as climate response, pollution control, ballast water management, ecosystem conservation, social well-being, stakeholder engagement, and economic diversification, thus requiring revision to meet the challenges created by incoherent governing instruments at all levels and among segments of the maritime economy.

[1]  Kaidi Nõmmela,et al.  Maritime Policy Design Framework with ESG Performance Approach: Case of Estonia , 2022, Economies.

[2]  Kanwar Muhammad Javed Iqbal,et al.  Mix-method modelling of actors’ capacity for environmental sustainability and climate compatible development in energy sector , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[3]  Johanna Kuhlmann,et al.  Narrative plots for regulatory, distributive, and redistributive policies , 2021, European Policy Analysis.

[4]  Andrei Hrebenciuc,et al.  The Importance of Maritime Transport for Economic Growth in the European Union: A Panel Data Analysis , 2021, Sustainability.

[5]  Kanwar Muhammad Javed Iqbal,et al.  Mix-Method Analysis For Assessing The Adequacy Of The State Of Governance For Climate Compatible Development In Agriculture Sector , 2021 .

[6]  A. Waheed,et al.  Climate Change Policy Coherence across Policies, Plans, and Strategies in Pakistan—Implications for the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor Plan , 2021, Environmental Management.

[7]  Erin K. Grey,et al.  Network analysis of ballast-mediated species transfer reveals important introduction and dispersal patterns in the Arctic , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[8]  K. Cullinane,et al.  Exploring the relationships between maritime connectivity, international trade and domestic production , 2020 .

[9]  Xiao Zhou,et al.  Assessing and mapping maritime transportation risk based on spatial fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: A case study in the South China sea , 2020 .

[10]  A. Farmery,et al.  Assessing policy coherence and coordination in the sustainable development of a Blue Economy. A case study from Timor Leste , 2020 .

[11]  Peter J. Stavroulakis,et al.  Strategic competitiveness in maritime clusters , 2020, Case Studies on Transport Policy.

[12]  Nho Luong Cong,et al.  A comparison of particulate matter and gaseous emission factors from two large cargo vessels during manoeuvring conditions , 2019, Energy Reports.

[13]  J. Støttrup,et al.  Indicator-Based Sustainability Assessment Tool to Support Coastal and Marine Management , 2019, Sustainability.

[14]  Hualong Yang,et al.  Uncovering CO2 Emissions Patterns from China-Oriented International Maritime Transport: Decomposition and Decoupling Analysis , 2019, Sustainability.

[15]  Paichin Huang,et al.  Diversification Business Performance Evaluation of Shipping Industry in China , 2019, Journal of Coastal Research.

[16]  S. Shahzad Development of Shipping Sector in Pakistan: Options and Proposed Strategy , 2016 .

[17]  S. Diez,et al.  Toward a Blue Economy: A Promise for Sustainable Growth in the Caribbean , 2016 .

[18]  S. Smith-Godfrey,et al.  Defining the Blue Economy , 2016 .

[19]  Vittorio Barale,et al.  Maritime spatial planning: opportunities & challenges in the framework of the EU integrated maritime policy , 2011 .

[20]  K. Kern Governance For Sustainable Development in the Baltic Sea Region , 2011 .

[21]  Eric C. Okonkwo,et al.  A review of cleaner alternative fuels for maritime transportation , 2021 .

[22]  Srdjan Vujičić,et al.  SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES OF MODERN SHIPPING INDUSTRY , 2020 .

[23]  Kum Fai Yuen,et al.  How can the maritime industry meet Sustainable Development Goals? An analysis of sustainability reports from the social entrepreneurship perspective , 2020 .

[24]  Kadir Mersin,et al.  Review of CO2 emission and reducing methods in maritime transportation , 2019, Thermal Science.

[25]  Monique Taylor The Chinese State, Oil and Energy Security , 2014 .

[26]  Pietro Evangelista,et al.  The role of training in developing entrepreneurship: the case of shipping in Italy [1] , 1998 .