Intuitiveness of vibrotactile speed regulation cues

Interpretations of vibrotactile stimulations were compared between two participant groups. In both groups, the task was to evaluate specifically designed tactile stimulations presented to the wrist or chest. Ascending, constant, and descending vibration frequency profiles of the stimuli represented information for three different speed regulation instructions: “accelerate your speed,” “keep your speed constant,” and “decelerate your speed,” respectively. The participants were treated differently so that one of the groups was first taught (i.e., primed) the meanings of the stimuli, whereas the other group was not taught (i.e., unprimed). The results showed that the stimuli were evaluated nearly equally in the primed and the unprimed groups. The best performing stimuli communicated the three intended meanings in the rate of 88% to 100% in the primed group and in the unprimed group in the rate of 71% to 83%. Both groups performed equally in evaluating “keep your speed constant” and “decelerate your speed” information. As the unprimed participants performed similarly to the primed participants, the results suggest that vibrotactile stimulation can be intuitively understood. The results suggest further that carefully designed vibrotactile stimulations could be functional in delivering easy-to-understand feedback on how to regulate the speed of movement, such as in physical exercise and rehabilitation applications.

[1]  J.B.F. van Erp,et al.  Application of tactile displays in sports : where to, how and when to move , 2006 .

[2]  Virpi Roto,et al.  Interaction in 4-second bursts: the fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI , 2005, CHI.

[3]  S. Tipper,et al.  Vision influences tactile perception without proprioceptive orienting , 1998, Neuroreport.

[4]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Cognition And Reality , 1976 .

[5]  Roope Raisamo,et al.  Haptic interaction becomes reality , 2009, J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ..

[6]  Karon E. MacLean,et al.  Detecting vibrations across the body in mobile contexts , 2011, CHI.

[7]  Jörn Hurtienne,et al.  Intuitive Use of User Interfaces: Defining a Vague Concept , 2007, HCI.

[8]  Gerhard Tröster,et al.  SwimMaster: a wearable assistant for swimmer , 2009, UbiComp.

[9]  Roope Raisamo,et al.  Vibrotactile information for intuitive speed regulation , 2009 .

[10]  Roope Raisamo,et al.  Emotional and behavioral responses to haptic stimulation , 2008, CHI.

[11]  M. Bradley,et al.  Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[12]  D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[13]  Andrey V. Savkin,et al.  Optimizing Heart Rate Regulation for Safe Exercise , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  A. F. Rovers,et al.  Using active haptic feedback in everyday products , 2006 .

[15]  Roope Raisamo,et al.  Perception of low-amplitude haptic stimuli when biking , 2008, ICMI '08.

[16]  Marc Rettig,et al.  Nobody reads documentation , 1991, CACM.

[17]  Roope Raisamo,et al.  Vibrotactile information for intuitive speed regulation , 2009, BCS HCI.

[18]  M. Bradley,et al.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. , 1994, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[19]  Jan O. Borchers,et al.  Tactile motion instructions for physical activities , 2009, CHI.

[20]  LylykangasJani,et al.  Intuitiveness of vibrotactile speed regulation cues , 2013, TAP 2013.

[21]  Valérie Gay,et al.  A mobile rehabilitation application for the remote monitoring of cardiac patients after a heart attack or a coronary bypass surgery , 2009, PETRA '09.

[22]  Lorna M. Brown,et al.  Feel who's talking: using tactons for mobile phone alerts , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[23]  Karon E. MacLean,et al.  The Role of Choice in Longitudinal Recall of Meaningful Tactile Signals , 2008, 2008 Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[24]  Lorna M. Brown,et al.  Non-visual information display using tactons , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[25]  C. E. Chapman,et al.  Perception of vibrotactile stimuli during motor activity in human subjects , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  H Summala,et al.  Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  A. Sarela,et al.  Activity and Heart Rate-based Measures for Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation , 2008, Methods of Information in Medicine.