Computer-aided diagnosis of masses with full-field digital mammography.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The authors developed and evaluated a method of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for mass detection with full-field digital mammography (FFDM). MATERIALS AND METHODS The new CAD method for FFDM employs adaptive, nonlinear multiscale processing and hybrid classification methods. The major strategies are (a) to "standardize" the mammographic image before it is input to the analysis modules, (b) to adapt the segmentation of suspicious regions adapt to accommodate different characteristics of masses and mammograms, and (c) to use combined "hard" and "soft" decision making in discriminating between mass and normal tissue regions. Two data sets of diagnostic FFDM mammograms were used. The training data set includes 36 normal and 24 abnormal mammograms (34 masses), and the testing data set includes 24 normal and 10 abnormal mammograms (10 masses). The tumors in this diagnostic database were more subtle and difficult to detect than those in screening databases the authors have used before. RESULTS With the limited database and a partial optimization, a sensitivity of 91% was obtained in training, with a false-positive rate of 3.21 per image. At this trained operating point of the CAD system, six of 10 subtle masses were detected in testing. CONCLUSION The CAD algorithms developed in screen-film mammography can be modified for FFDM. More data analysis and system optimization and evaluation will be needed before CAD can be integrated efficiently into the performance of FFDM.

[1]  R. Wahl,et al.  New methods for imaging the breast: techniques, findings, and potential. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  M. Wallis,et al.  A review of false negative mammography in a symptomatic population. , 1991, Clinical radiology.

[3]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Scale-Space Theory in Computer Vision , 1993, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[4]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Scale-Space and Edge Detection Using Anisotropic Diffusion , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  L P Clarke,et al.  Digital mammography: computer-assisted diagnosis method for mass detection with multiorientation and multiresolution wavelet transforms. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[6]  S Muller,et al.  Full-field digital mammography designed as a complete system. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[7]  S. Rubin,et al.  Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. , 1995, JAMA.

[8]  D. Black The theory of committees and elections , 1959 .

[9]  P. Wingo,et al.  Cancer statistics, 1997 , 1997, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[10]  Sheng Liu,et al.  Multiresolution detection of spiculated lesions in digital mammograms , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[11]  Steve McLaughlin,et al.  Comparative study of textural analysis techniques to characterise tissue from intravascular ultrasound , 1996, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[12]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[13]  J. Elmore,et al.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Lihua Li,et al.  Wavelet transform for directional feature extraction in medical imaging , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing.

[15]  N. Petrick,et al.  Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. , 1999, Radiology.

[16]  R A Clark,et al.  False-positive reduction in CAD mass detection using a competitive classification strategy. , 2001, Medical physics.

[17]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  The Theory of Committees and Elections. , 1959 .

[18]  Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas An adaptive clustering algorithm for image segmentation , 1992, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[19]  Lewin Jm Full-field digital mammography. A candid assessment. , 1999 .