Visual Outcomes of Ultrathin-Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty

Purpose To examine the impact of graft thickness (GT) on postoperative visual acuity and endothelial cell density after ultrathin-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus conventional DSAEK. Methods The medical records of all patients who underwent DSAEK at our institute during a 2-year period were reviewed. After excluding subjects with low visual potential, 34 eyes were divided into two groups based on the postoperative GT as measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT): an UT-DSAEK group (GT ≤ 100 μm, n=13 eyes) and a DSAEK group (GT > 100 μm, n=21 eyes). The groups were compared with regard to best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subjective refraction, central corneal thickness (CCT), GT, and endothelial cell density (ECD). Results Preoperative BCVA (logMAR) was 1.035 ± 0.514 and 0.772 ± 0.428 for UT-DSAEK and DSAEK, respectively (P=0.072). At 6 months postoperatively, BCVA was 0.088 ± 0.150 following UT-DSAEK and 0.285 ± 0.158 following DSAEK (P=0.001). Conclusion DSAEK grafts with a thickness under 100 μm offered better visual outcomes during the early postoperative period.

[1]  T. Berendschot,et al.  A Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial of Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) versus DSAEK. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[2]  A. Turnbull,et al.  Determinants of visual quality after endothelial keratoplasty. , 2016, Survey of ophthalmology.

[3]  Sanjay V. Patel,et al.  Effect of Graft Thickness on Visual Acuity After Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  B. Acar,et al.  Visual acuity and endothelial cell density with respect to the graft thickness in Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: one year results. , 2014, International journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  M. Busin,et al.  Does thickness matter: ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty , 2014, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[6]  A. Agarwal,et al.  Pre-Descemet's endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK) , 2014, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[7]  P. Phillips,et al.  Preoperative Graft Thickness Measurements Do Not Influence Final BSCVA or Speed of Vision Recovery After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2013, Cornea.

[8]  T. Berendschot,et al.  Effects of graft thickness and asymmetry on visual gain and aberrations after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2013, JAMA ophthalmology.

[9]  V. Scorcia,et al.  Ultrathin descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique: two-year outcomes. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[10]  Roni M. Shtein,et al.  Relationship of Visual Acuity and Lamellar Thickness in Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2013, Cornea.

[11]  K. van Dijk,et al.  Identifying causes for poor visual outcome after DSEK/DSAEK following secondary DMEK in the same eye , 2013, Acta ophthalmologica.

[12]  M. Terry,et al.  Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: the tenuous relationship between donor thickness and postoperative vision. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[13]  M. Moshirfar,et al.  Double-pass microkeratome technique for ultra-thin graft preparation in Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty , 2012, Clinical ophthalmology.

[14]  F. Kruse,et al.  Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[15]  D. Ponzin,et al.  Microkeratome-assisted preparation of ultrathin grafts for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  H. van Cleynenbreugel,et al.  Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: Effect of Intraoperative Lenticule Thickness on Visual Outcome and Endothelial Cell Density , 2011, Cornea.

[17]  P. Hossain,et al.  Impact of graft thickness on visual acuity after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty , 2011, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[18]  E. Holland,et al.  Comparison of Central Corneal Graft Thickness to Visual Acuity Outcomes in Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2011, Cornea.

[19]  Sanjay V. Patel,et al.  Host and graft thickness after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. , 2010, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  M. Price,et al.  Endothelial keratoplasty – a review , 2010, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[21]  F. Kruse,et al.  Changes in donor corneal lenticule thickness after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with organ-cultured corneas , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[22]  Sanjay V. Patel,et al.  The effect of corneal light scatter on vision after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.

[23]  F. Manns,et al.  One-year results and anterior segment optical coherence tomography findings of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty combined with phacoemulsification. , 2008, Archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  V. Scorcia,et al.  A modified technique for descemet membrane stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty to minimize endothelial cell loss. , 2008, Archives of ophthalmology.

[25]  M. Terry,et al.  Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Simplified Technique to Minimize Graft Dislocation, Iatrogenic Graft Failure, and Pupillary Block , 2008 .

[26]  M. Terry,et al.  Descemet-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: Six-month Results in a Prospective Study of 100 Eyes , 2008, Cornea.

[27]  F. Price,et al.  Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[28]  G. Melles,et al.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). , 2006, Cornea.