PolyCO in XRF analysis: Fundamental Parameter Method applied for Japanese Buddhist scroll studies

Abstract The quantitative evaluation of chemical elements from X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) analysis still remains a strong hurdle in X-ray Spectrometry, mainly due to significant matrix effects involved in the processes. The Fundamental Parameter Method (FPM) is a valid tool for the calculation of analyte concentration unless the primary source comes from a Synchrotron Radiation facility or the experimental design is based on a confocal layout. The approximation of an infinitely thin sample represents a feasible way to apply the FPM approach along with dedicated X-ray optics implemented in the XRF apparatus to improve the performance of the primary beam (and also of the fluorescence signal reaching the detector). This is routinely available at the XLab Frascati of INFN-LNF thanks to the ”Rainbow X-ray” (RXR) facility, the μXRF station opened to users and optimized for most of X-ray analytical research fields. The basic principle of the station is in the use of various geometrical combinations of polycapillary optics for X-ray beam shaping (focusing/collimation) applied to specially designed laboratory units. The flexible RXR layout allows investigating specimens of the dimensions ranging from several millimeters up to half meter and weighting up to several tens of kilograms with the main advantage of having a detection system able to work separately both at high and low X-ray energies. The aim of the present work is to show the results obtained in quantitative XRF analysis by applying the FPM approach to the RXR experimental layout in a study of the pigments covering two different Japanese scrolls, n.142 838 (also known as Engi Jizo Emakimono) and n. 142 846, coming from the private Ragusa Collection presently stored at Pigorini Museum in Italy.

[1]  Kazuhiko Nakano,et al.  Development of confocal micro X-ray fluorescence instrument using two X-ray beams , 2007 .

[2]  James E. Penner-Hahn,et al.  Handbook of X-ray Spectrometry, 2nd ed., Revised and Expanded Edited by René E. Van Grieken (University of Antwerp) and Andrzej A. Markowicz (Vienna, Austria). Marcel Dekker, Inc: New York and Basel. 2002. xvi + 984 pp. $250.00. ISBN 0-8247-0600-5. , 2002 .

[3]  Dariush Hampai,et al.  Laboratory total reflection X-ray fluorescence analysis for low concentration samples ☆ , 2014 .

[4]  C. Mazzuca,et al.  Application of polycapillary optics to x-ray fluorescence for advanced spectroscopy and microscopy studies , 2020, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[5]  C. Streli,et al.  Improved micro x-ray fluorescence spectrometer for light element analysis. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[6]  M. Krause,et al.  Atomic radiative and radiationless yields for K and L shells , 1979 .

[7]  B. Kanngießer,et al.  Quantification for 3D micro X-ray fluorescence , 2012 .

[8]  Alexandre Simionovici,et al.  A library for X-ray-matter interaction cross sections for X-ray fluorescence applications , 2004 .

[9]  Johann Wernisch,et al.  Least‐squares fits of fundamental parameters for quantitative x‐ray analysis as a function of Z (11 ≤ Z ≤ 83) and E (1 keV ≤ E ≤ 50 keV) , 1985 .

[10]  I. Szalóki,et al.  A novel confocal XRF-Raman spectrometer and FPM model for analysis of solid objects and liquid substances , 2019, Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry.

[11]  A. Wims,et al.  Relative intensity factors for K, L and M shell x‐ray lines , 1982 .

[12]  Bruno Golosio,et al.  The xraylib library for X-ray-matter interactions. Recent developments , 2011 .

[13]  Andrzej A. Markowicz,et al.  Handbook of X-Ray Spectrometry , 2002 .

[14]  Dariush Hampai,et al.  Experimental study for the feasibility of using hard x-rays for micro-XRF analysis of multilayered metals , 2014 .

[15]  M. A. Kumakhov,et al.  Multiple reflection from surface X-ray optics , 1990 .

[16]  V. A. Solé,et al.  A multiplatform code for the analysis of energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectra , 2007 .

[17]  Dariush Hampai,et al.  Polycapillary based μXRF station for 3D colour tomography , 2018 .

[18]  Dariush Hampai,et al.  2D-3D μXRF elemental mapping of archeological samples , 2017 .

[19]  Sultan B. Dabagov,et al.  REVIEWS OF TOPICAL PROBLEMS: Channeling of neutral particles in micro- and nanocapillaries , 2003 .

[20]  S. Dabagov,et al.  Advanced channeling technologies for X-ray applications , 2019, Radiation Physics and Chemistry.

[21]  C. Streli,et al.  Confocal micro-x-ray fluorescence spectrometer for light element analysis. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[22]  D. Hampai,et al.  Elemental mapping and microimaging by x-ray capillary optics. , 2008, Optics letters.

[23]  S. Miura,et al.  Nondestructive analysis of a painting, a national treasure in Japan , 2007, Powder Diffraction.

[24]  K. Nakano,et al.  Development of a new total reflection X‐ray fluorescence instrument using polycapillary X‐ray lens , 2006 .

[25]  F. Claisse,et al.  Quantitative X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis: Theory and Application , 1995 .

[26]  Tom Schoonjans,et al.  A general Monte Carlo simulation of energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometers — Part 6. Quantification through iterative simulations , 2013 .

[27]  John Winter PAINTS AND SUPPORTS IN FAR EASTERN PICTORIAL ART , 1985 .

[28]  F. Brenker,et al.  Fundamental parameter based quantification algorithm for confocal nano-X-ray fluorescence analysis , 2012 .

[29]  Ron Jenkins,et al.  X-ray fluorescence spectrometry , 1999 .

[30]  A. Marcelli,et al.  Challenging X-ray Fluorescence Applications for Environmental Studies at XLab Frascati , 2018, Condensed Matter.