Virtual project productivity - a management issue

Projects that operate in a virtual mode remain to be risky. Despite improving technology they fail more often and are less productive. This paper focuses on team collaboration and virtual project management in the search for solutions and argues that new research environments are needed to achieve results with higher external validity. One under-researched element of virtual project management is the link between the project team and its environment. This especially has an impact on the continuous (re-) structuration of the project and its team members. The paper discusses a living laboratory environment in which real-life situations are used to study technical and organisational scenarios to go beyond traditional close system control group experiment for the longitudinal study of virtual project team collaboration. As an example of research results from the living laboratory the paper presents a set of coordination routines, how they evolve within the team over time, and their impact on productivity. Such routines can serve as best practices for virtual project management.

[1]  P. M. Wognum,et al.  Inter-organisational project management in context: managing differences , 2001 .

[2]  Paul C. van Fenema,et al.  A typology of project management: emergence and evolution of new forms , 1999 .

[3]  Hans G. Krijnen.  The flexible firm , 1979 .

[4]  Damir Novosel,et al.  Successful management of complex, multinational R&D projects , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  M. S. Poole,et al.  Decision Development in Small Groups IV A Typology of Group Decision Paths , 1989 .

[6]  J. McGrath.  Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[7]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  Knowledge management in virtual projects: a research agenda , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams , 2000 .

[9]  Nancy M. Dixon.  Developing managers for the learning organization , 1993 .

[10]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Synchronizing pace in asynchronous global virtual project teams , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Building the Flexible Firm: How to Remain Competitive , 1998 .

[12]  Abbe Mowshowitz.  Virtual organisation. Special section , 1997 .

[13]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Collaborative Project Management Software , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  Robert Pellerin,et al.  Discussion of metrics for distributed project management: preliminary findings , 2002 .

[15]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms , 1986 .

[16]  B. Tuckman,et al.  Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited , 1977 .

[17]  J. Benders.  Building the Flexible Firm: How to Remain Competitive , 1999 .

[18]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[19]  Gordon Sung,et al.  Engineering productivity and collaboration systems-a review of six years research at the international concurrent enterprising (ICE) conference , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE).

[20]  Brian Helbrough.  Computer assisted collaboration — the fourth dimension of project management? , 1995 .