Selection of bias correction models for improving the daily PM10 forecasts of WRF-EURAD in Porto, Portugal

Abstract The techniques of bias correction are commonly used for improving the performance of deterministic air quality forecasting systems. One issue not addressed in previous studies is how to select systematically and objectively the best correction model from a pool of candidates. In this study, a method that could evaluate the probabilities of all model candidates based on a set of training data is proposed to select the most accurate and robust model by finding the one with the maximum probability. The Bayesian method was applied to select bias correction models at 12 monitoring stations for improving the forecasts of daily averaged PM 10 concentrations given by the deterministic air quality forecasting system WRF-EURAD in Porto, Portugal. At each station, 4095 (=2 12 –1) correction model candidates were systematically formed by adopting different linear combinations of 12 input variables. Selection of the best model was processed based on one year of monitoring and WRF-EURAD data. Based on the 2012 data, the selected model at each station was found to have significantly higher probability than the other candidates, and it is also much simpler than the full model. These selected models were then used to correct the raw forecasts by WRF-EURAD in the following year. The corrected forecasts show significant improvement on the performance indicators ( RMSE by 35.8%, R by 58.5%, MFB by 68%, EDR by 38.3%, FAR by 51.8%, CSI by 30.8%) over the raw outputs of WRF-EURAD, confirming the success of the proposed technique.

[1]  Montserrat Fuentes,et al.  Model Evaluation and Spatial Interpolation by Bayesian Combination of Observations with Outputs from Numerical Models , 2005, Biometrics.

[2]  A. Monteiro,et al.  Potential effects of using biodiesel in road-traffic on air quality over the Porto urban area, Portugal , 2016 .

[3]  J. Beck,et al.  Model Selection using Response Measurements: Bayesian Probabilistic Approach , 2004 .

[4]  P. Goyal,et al.  Development of artificial intelligence based NO 2 forecasting models at Taj Mahal, Agra , 2015 .

[5]  Piotr Holnicki,et al.  Emission Data Uncertainty in Urban Air Quality Modeling—Case Study , 2015, Environmental Modeling & Assessment.

[6]  D. Byun,et al.  Review of the Governing Equations, Computational Algorithms, and Other Components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System , 2006 .

[7]  A. Persson.  User Guide to ECMWF forecast products , 2001 .

[8]  S. Hanna,et al.  Air quality model performance evaluation , 2004 .

[9]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Real-time air quality forecasting, part I: History, techniques, and current status , 2012 .

[10]  L. Emmons,et al.  The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions , 2012 .

[11]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Estimation of water retention curve of granular soils from particle-size distribution — a Bayesian probabilistic approach , 2012 .

[12]  Hongliang Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of a seven-year air quality simulation using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)/Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) models in the eastern United States. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  J. Dudhia.  A Nonhydrostatic Version of the Penn State–NCAR Mesoscale Model: Validation Tests and Simulation of an Atlantic Cyclone and Cold Front , 1993 .

[14]  C Borrego,et al.  Procedures for estimation of modelling uncertainty in air quality assessment. , 2008, Environment international.

[15]  Michael Memmesheimer,et al.  Analysis of a regional model (EURAD) near surface gas concentration predictions using observations from networks , 1995 .

[16]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[17]  Xiao Han,et al.  Assessment of the impact of emissions reductions on air quality over North China Plain , 2016 .

[18]  Gilles Foret,et al.  Combining deterministic and statistical approaches for PM10 forecasting in Europe , 2009 .

[19]  O. Tchepel,et al.  Bias Correction Techniques to Improve Air Quality Ensemble Predictions: Focus on O3 and PM Over Portugal , 2013, Environmental Modeling & Assessment.

[20]  M. Memmesheimer,et al.  Long-term simulations of particulate matter in Europe on different scales using sequential nesting of a regional model , 2004 .

[21]  Application of a statistical post-processing technique to a gridded, operational, air quality forecast , 2014 .

[22]  G. Grell,et al.  A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) , 1994 .

[23]  Sandro Finardi,et al.  Application of bias adjustment techniques to improve air quality forecasts , 2015 .

[24]  D. Holland,et al.  A Comparison of Statistical Techniques for Combining Modeled and Observed Concentrations to Create High-Resolution Ozone Air Quality Surfaces , 2010, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[25]  Leonor Patricia Güereca,et al.  Development of a high-resolution (1 km × 1 km, 1 h) emission model for Spain: The High-Elective Resolution Modelling Emission System (HERMES) , 2008 .

[26]  Robert Vautard,et al.  Validation of a hybrid forecasting system for the ozone concentrations over the Paris area , 2001 .

[27]  H. Martins,et al.  Air quality over Portugal in 2020 , 2015 .

[28]  Ana Isabel Miranda,et al.  Evaluating strategies to reduce urban air pollution , 2016 .

[29]  Stephen J. Lord,et al.  Evaluation of the NCEP Global Forecast System at the ARM SGP Site , 2006 .

[30]  Francisco Ferreira,et al.  Lisbon air quality forecast using statistical methods , 2009 .

[31]  R. Pielke,et al.  A comprehensive meteorological modeling system—RAMS , 1992 .

[32]  J. Pires,et al.  Evolutionary procedure based model to predict ground–level ozone concentrations , 2010 .

[33]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Bayesian Methods for Updating Dynamic Models , 2011 .

[34]  Rohit Mathur,et al.  Bias adjustment techniques for improving ozone air quality forecasts , 2008 .

[35]  Pak Wai Chan,et al.  Process analysis of regional aerosol pollution during spring in the Pearl River Delta region, China , 2015 .

[36]  Joanna Struzewska,et al.  Application of model output statistics to the GEM-AQ high resolution air quality forecast , 2016 .

[37]  Numerical Simulations on the Effect of Sea–Land Breezes on Atmospheric Haze over the Pearl River Delta Region , 2009 .

[38]  Rohit Mathur,et al.  Assessment of an ensemble of seven real-time ozone forecasts over eastern North America during the summer of 2004 , 2005 .

[39]  Wouter Lefebvre,et al.  Kalman filter-based air quality forecast adjustment , 2012 .

[40]  Sara Basart,et al.  How bias-correction can improve air quality forecasts over Portugal , 2011 .

[41]  Youhua Tang,et al.  Bias-corrected ensemble and probabilistic forecasts of surface ozone over eastern North America during the summer of 2004 , 2006 .

[42]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Modeling of environmental influence in structural health assessment for reinforced concrete buildings , 2010 .

[43]  Sara Basart,et al.  A full year evaluation of the CALIOPE-EU air quality modeling system over Europe for 2004 , 2010 .

[44]  Kai Meng Mok,et al.  Improvement of the multilayer perceptron for air quality modelling through an adaptive learning scheme , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[45]  Rohit Mathur,et al.  An operational evaluation of the Eta-CMAQ air quality forecast model , 2005 .

[46]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Impact of spatial resolution on air quality simulation: A case study in a highly industrialized area in Shanghai, China , 2015 .