Scientific standards for studies in forensic genetics.

Forensic molecular genetics has evolved from a rapidly developing field with changing technologies into a highly recognized and generally accepted forensic science, leading to the establishment of national DNA databases with DNA profiles from suspects and convicted offenders. DNA evidence has taken a central role by carrying a significant weight for convictions, as well as by excluding innocent suspects early on in a criminal investigation. Due to this impact on the criminal justice system, guidelines for research in forensic genetics have been introduced already since many years. The most important issues regarding the selection and definition of typing systems both for paternity testing and for forensic identification, the criteria for technical and biostatistical validation, as well as the use of mitochondrial DNA analysis are summarized and discussed.

[1]  Á. Carracedo,et al.  Ethical-legal problems of DNA databases in criminal investigation , 2000, Journal of medical ethics.

[2]  Progress in methodology and standards in European molecular genetics laboratories. , 1998, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[3]  J. Butler,et al.  Genetics and Genomics of Core Short Tandem Repeat Loci Used in Human Identity Testing , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  E. Thompson,et al.  Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. , 1992, Biometrics.

[5]  Angel Carracedo,et al.  SNPs in forensic genetics: a review on SNP typing methodologies. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[6]  Niels Morling,et al.  Paternity Testing Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: recommendations on genetic investigations in paternity cases. , 2002, Forensic science international.

[7]  J. Buckleton,et al.  Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation , 2004 .

[8]  A Sajantila,et al.  Evaluation of gastrointestinal cancer tissues as a source of genetic information for forensic investigations by using STRs. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[9]  B Budowle,et al.  Validation of short tandem repeats (STRs) for forensic usage: performance testing of fluorescent multiplex STR systems and analysis of authentic and simulated forensic samples. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  P Gill,et al.  Exclusion of a man charged with murder by DNA fingerprinting. , 1987, Forensic science international.

[11]  A. Sajantila,et al.  Mutations at Y-STR loci: implications for paternity testing and forensic analysis. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[12]  Niels Morling,et al.  A report of the 2000 and 2001 paternity testing workshops of the English speaking working group of the international society for forensic genetics. , 2002, Forensic science international.

[13]  B. S. Weir,et al.  Exact tests for association between alleles at arbitrary numbers of loci , 2005, Genetica.

[14]  S. Walsh.  Legal perceptions of forensic DNA profiling part I: a review of the legal literature. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[15]  W. Parson,et al.  Monitoring the inheritance of heteroplasmy by computer-assisted detection of mixed basecalls in the entire human mitochondrial DNA control region , 2004, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[16]  P. Gill,et al.  Considerations from the European DNA profiling group (EDNAP) concerning STR nomenclature. , 1997, Forensic science international.

[17]  George F. Sensabaugh,et al.  DNA typing from single hairs , 1988, Nature.

[18]  Robin Williams,et al.  ‘Wonderment and dread’: representations of DNA in ethical disputes about forensic DNA databases , 2004, New genetics and society.

[19]  A. Carracedo,et al.  DNA recommendations , 1997, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[20]  W. Mayr,et al.  DNA Recommendations‐1994 Report Concerning Further Recommendations of the DNA Commission of the ISFH Regarding PCR‐Based Polymorphisms in STR (Short Tandem Repeat) Systems , 1995 .

[21]  Hans-Jürgen Bandelt,et al.  A practical guide to mitochondrial DNA error prevention in clinical, forensic, and population genetics. , 2005, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[22]  W R Mayr,et al.  DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics (ISFG): an update of the recommendations on the use of Y-STRs in forensic analysis , 2006, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[23]  P Gill,et al.  A comparison of the characteristics of profiles produced with the AMPFlSTR SGM Plus multiplex system for both standard and low copy number (LCN) STR DNA analysis. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[24]  D J Reeder,et al.  Impact of DNA typing on standards and practice in the forensic community. , 1999, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[25]  H. Polesky.  Impact of molecular (DNA) testing on determination of parentage. , 1999, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[26]  B Brinkmann,et al.  Considerations by the European DNA profiling (EDNAP) group on the working practices, nomenclature and interpretation of mitochondrial DNA profiles. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[27]  A. Salas,et al.  Artificial recombination in forensic mtDNA population databases , 2004, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[28]  P. Gill,et al.  STR analysis of artificially degraded DNA-results of a collaborative European exercise. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[29]  Hans-Jürgen Bandelt,et al.  Phantom mutation hotspots in human mitochondrial DNA , 2005, Electrophoresis.

[30]  Á. Carracedo,et al.  The 1998-1999 collaborative exercises and proficiency testing program on DNA typing of the Spanish and Portuguese Working Group of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (GEP-ISFG). , 2000, Forensic science international.

[31]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  DNA fingerprinting on trial , 1989, Nature.

[32]  James Curran,et al.  A graphical simulation model of the entire DNA process associated with the analysis of short tandem repeat loci , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[33]  D J Balding,et al.  DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. , 1994, Forensic science international.

[34]  P M Schneider,et al.  A brief history of the formation of DNA databases in forensic science within Europe. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[35]  A J Urquhart,et al.  Primer binding site mutations affecting the typing of STR loci contained within the AMPFlSTR SGM Plus kit. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[36]  P. M. Schneider,et al.  Criminal DNA databases: the European situation. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[37]  H. Bandelt,et al.  Detecting errors in mtDNA data by phylogenetic analysis , 2001, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[38]  A. González-Neira,et al.  Chimpanzee homologous of human Y specific STRs. A comparative study and a proposal for nomenclature. , 2002, Forensic science international.

[39]  Gillian Tully,et al.  The EDNAP mitochondrial DNA population database (EMPOP) collaborative exercises: organisation, results and perspectives. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[40]  D. Hartl,et al.  Population genetics in forensic DNA typing. , 1991, Science.

[41]  Peter Gill,et al.  A comparison of adjustment methods to test the robustness of an STR DNA database comprised of 24 European populations. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[42]  Marianne Schürenkamp,et al.  The GEDNAP blind trial concept part II. Trends and developments , 2004, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[43]  B Brinkmann,et al.  Mutation rate in human microsatellites: influence of the structure and length of the tandem repeat. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[44]  M. Jobling,et al.  Evaluation of Y-chromosomal STRs: a multicenter study , 1997, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[45]  B Brinkmann,et al.  DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: recommendations on forensic analysis using Y-chromosome STRs. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[46]  P. Gill,et al.  Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[47]  B. Brinkmann,et al.  Different types of structural variation in STRs: HumFES/FPS, HumVWA and HumD21S11 , 2005, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[48]  P. Neufeld,et al.  When science takes the witness stand. , 1990, Scientific American.

[49]  I. Evett,et al.  Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists , 1998 .

[50]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[51]  Hans-Jürgen Bandelt,et al.  Harvesting the fruit of the human mtDNA tree. , 2006, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[52]  Stuart Anderson,et al.  Trends and Developments , 2004 .

[53]  J. Riancho,et al.  Sequence structure and population data of the X-linked markers DXS7423 and DXS8377--clarification of conflicting statements published by two working groups. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[54]  L. Roewer,et al.  Cell line DNA typing in forensic genetics--the necessity of reliable standards. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[55]  N. Morton.  DNA Forensic Science 1995 , 1995, European journal of human genetics : EJHG.

[56]  B Brinkmann,et al.  DNA commission of the international society for forensic genetics: guidelines for mitochondrial DNA typing. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[57]  R. Fimmers,et al.  1991 report concerning recommendations of the DNA commission of the International Society for Forensic Haemogenetics Relating to the use of DNA Polymorphism. , 1992, Vox sanguinis.

[58]  Ian C. Gray,et al.  Identification of the skeletal remains of a murder victim by DNA analysis , 1991, Nature.

[59]  I. Kopp,et al.  European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI) and its quality and competence assurance efforts. , 2003, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.