Power, Discretion and Strategy

This essay starts with a brief review of some of the main approaches to power, and identifies four: ‘power to’, ‘power over’, ‘power/storage’ and ‘power discretion’. It argues that these are all viable, but that they should be linked to a fifth — that of ‘power/effects' — with its stress on the continued performance of social relations. But how are such relations stabilised? It is argued, in answer to this question, that social relations are never purely social in character: rather they are heterogeneous, being embodied in a series of corporeal, textual, natural and technical materials. Finally, certain strategies for ordering these relations and their power effects are examined for the case of a formal organisation, and it is argued that such strategies are always, and necessarily, discursively impure.

[1]  D. Haraway.  A manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s , 1987 .

[2]  John Law.  On the Social Explanation of Technical Change: The Case of the Portuguese Maritime Expansion , 1987 .

[3]  B. Barnes,et al.  On Authority and its Relationship to Power , 1984 .

[4]  David Knights,et al.  The Concept of Strategy in Sociology: A Note of Dissent , 1990 .

[5]  B. Latour.  Give me a Laboratory and 1 will raise the Word , 1983 .

[6]  Bruno Latour,et al.  The Powers of Association , 1984 .

[7]  Scott D. Sagan,et al.  Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance, Donald MacKenzie, 1990. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 500 pages. ISBN: 0-262-13258-3. $29.95 , 1990 .

[8]  E. Eisenstein.  The printing press as an agent of change , 1969 .

[9]  Judith A. McGaw.  Accounting for Innovation: Technological Change and Business Practice in the Berkshire County Paper Industry , 1985 .

[10]  R. D'amico.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 1978, Telos.

[11]  Eric J. Freeman,et al.  The printing press as an agent of change: communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe , 1981, Medical History.

[12]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Advances in social theory and methodology : toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies , 1981 .

[13]  B. Latour.  Visualization and cognition: thinking with eyes and hands , 1986 .

[14]  Elizabeth L. Useem,et al.  The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society , 1986 .

[15]  Michel Callon,et al.  STRUGGLES AND NEGOTIATIONS TO DEFINE WHAT IS PROBLEMA TIC AND WHAT IS NOT The Socia-logic of Translation * , 1980 .

[16]  Friedrich Engels,et al.  Capital : a critical analysis of capitalist production. , 1946 .

[17]  S. Shapin.  The Invisible Technician , 1989 .

[18]  G. Fyfe,et al.  Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations , 1988 .

[19]  M. Foucault.  The Subject and Power , 1982, Critical Inquiry.

[20]  B. Latour,et al.  Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? , 1986 .

[21]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[22]  M. Callon.  Struggles and Negotiations to Define What is Problematic and What is Not , 1980 .

[23]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. , 1985 .

[24]  Langdon Winner,et al.  The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High , 1986 .

[25]  H. Dreyfus,et al.  Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. , 1985 .

[26]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  The production of belief: contribution to an economy of symbolic goods , 1980 .

[27]  S. Shapin.  Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts , 1981, Medical History.

[28]  J. Law.  On Power and its Tactics: A View from the Sociology of Science , 1986 .

[29]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .