The energy and greenhouse-gas implications of internet video streaming in the United States

The rapid growth of streaming video entertainment has recently received attention as a possibly less energy intensive alternative to the manufacturing and transportation of digital video discs (DVDs). This study utilizes a life-cycle assessment approach to estimate the primary energy use and greenhouse-gas emissions associated with video viewing through both traditional DVD methods and online video streaming. Base-case estimates for 2011 video viewing energy and CO2(e) emission intensities indicate video streaming can be more efficient than DVDs, depending on DVD viewing method. Video streaming benefits from relatively more efficient end-user devices than DVD viewing, though much of that savings is lost when accounting for the additional energy from network data transmission. Video streaming appears distinctly favorable when compared against any DVD viewing that includes consumer driving, which significantly increases the energy and CO2(e) emissions per viewing hour. Total US 2011 video viewing required about 192 PJ of primary energy and emitted about 10.5 billion kg of CO2(e). Shifting all 2011 DVD viewing to video streaming reduces the total primary energy use to about 162 PJ and the CO2(e) emissions to about 8.6 billion kg, representing a savings equivalent to the primary energy used to meet the electricity demand of nearly 200 000 US households each year. Sensitivity analysis indicates that results are most influenced by the end-user DVD player power demand, data transmission energy, and consumer travel for store DVDs. Data center energy use—both operational and embodied within the IT equipment—account for <1% of the total video streaming energy use. Results from this study indicate that designers and policy makers should focus on the efficiency of end-user devices and network transmission energy to curb future increases in energy use from the proliferation of video streaming.

[1]  R.S. Tucker,et al.  Energy Consumption in Optical IP Networks , 2009, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[2]  J. Koomey,et al.  Characteristics of low-carbon data centres , 2013 .

[3]  R. Olmon,et al.  Antenna–load interactions at optical frequencies: impedance matching to quantum systems , 2012, Nanotechnology.

[4]  Prashant J. Shenoy,et al.  Shipping to streaming: is this shift green? , 2010, Green Networking '10.

[5]  Priya Mahadevan,et al.  Reducing lifecycle energy use of network switches , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology.

[6]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  The Direct Energy Demand of Internet Data Flows , 2013 .

[7]  C. Weber,et al.  The Energy and Climate Change Implications of Different Music Delivery Methods , 2010 .

[8]  Michele Blazek,et al.  Measurement of environmental impacts of telework adoption amidst change in complex organizations: AT&T survey methodology and results , 2002 .

[9]  Eric Masanet,et al.  The Energy Efficiency Potential of Cloud-Based Software: A U.S. Case Study , 2014 .

[10]  S. Pacca,et al.  Comparative Energy, Environmental, and Economic Analysis of Traditional and E‐commerce DVD Rental Networks , 2007 .

[11]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Frictionless Commerce? A Comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailers , 2000 .

[12]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Environmental implications of wireless technologies: news delivery and business meetings. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Michael Ritthoff,et al.  The environmental and social impacts of digital music : a case study with EMI ; final report ; Digital Europe , 2003 .

[14]  L. Hilty,et al.  Scenario Analysis , 2010, Ten Laws of Operational Risk.

[15]  J. Koomey Worldwide electricity used in data centers , 2008 .

[16]  Min Chen,et al.  Rethinking energy efficiency models of cellular networks with embodied energy , 2011, IEEE Network.

[17]  Alexander Stadel,et al.  Life-Cycle Evaluation of Concrete Building Construction as a Strategy for Sustainable Cities , 2013 .

[18]  Stephane de la Rue du Can,et al.  Optimization of Product Life Cycles to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in California , 2005 .

[19]  Didier Colle,et al.  Power consumption in telecommunication networks: overview and reduction strategies , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[20]  J. Malmodin,et al.  LCA of data transmission and IP core networks , 2012, 2012 Electronics Goes Green 2012+.

[21]  Eric Williams,et al.  Environmental effects of information and communications technologies , 2011, Nature.

[22]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  Speakout: Harry Potter and the health of the environment , 2000 .

[23]  A. Horvath,et al.  Data center design and location: Consequences for electricity use and greenhouse-gas emissions , 2011 .