Dynamically Reconfigurable Approach to Multidisciplinary Problems

The complexity and autonomy of the constituent disciplines and the diversity of the disciplinary data formats make the task of integrating simulations into a multidisciplinary design optimization problem extremely time-consuming and difficult. We propose a dynamically reconfigurable approach to MDO problem formulation wherein an appropriate implementation of the disciplinary information results in basic computational components that can be combined into different MDO problem formulations and solution algorithms, including hybrid strategies, with relative ease. The ability to re-use the computational components is due to the special structure of the MDO problem. We believe that this structure can and should be used to formulate and solve optimization problems in the multidisciplinary context. The present work identifies the basic computational components in several MDO problem formulations and examines the dynamically reconfigurable approach in the context of a popular class of optimization methods. We show that if the disciplinary sensitivity information is implemented in a modular fashion, the transfer of sensitivity information among the formulations under study is straightforward. This enables not only experimentation with a variety of problem formations in a research environment, but also the flexible use of formulations in a production design environment.

[1]  N. M. Alexandrov,et al.  Algorithmic Perspectives on Problem Formulations in MDO , 2000 .

[2]  G. R. Shubin,et al.  A comparison of optimization-based approaches for a model computational aerodynamics design problem , 1992 .

[3]  M. El-Alem.  A global convergence theory for the Celis-Dennis-Tapia trust-region algorithm for constrained optimization , 1991 .

[4]  Howard M. Adelman,et al.  Recent advances in integrated multidisciplinary optimization of rotorcraft , 1992 .

[5]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Collaborative optimization: an architecture for large-scale distributed design , 1996 .

[6]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  An Interior Point Algorithm for Large-Scale Nonlinear Programming , 1999, SIAM J. Optim..

[7]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 1981 .

[8]  Massood Mehrinfar,et al.  Multilevel optimum design of structures with fiber-composite stiffened-panel components , 1982 .

[9]  Gene Hou,et al.  Overview of Sensitivity Analysis and Shape Optimization for Complex Aerodynamic Configurations , 1999 .

[10]  Richard H. Byrd,et al.  A Trust Region Algorithm for Nonlinearly Constrained Optimization , 1987 .

[11]  Natalia Alexandrov,et al.  Analytical and Computational Aspects of Collaborative Optimization for Multidisciplinary Design , 2002 .

[12]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Development and Application of the Collaborative Optimization Architecture in a Multidisciplinary Design Environment , 1995 .

[13]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF COUPLED SYSTEMS: A CRITICAL OVERVIEW OF APPROACHES , 1994 .

[14]  R. Haftka,et al.  Elements of Structural Optimization , 1984 .

[15]  J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski.  Two alternative ways for solving the coordination problem in multilevel optimization , 1993 .

[16]  John E. Dennis,et al.  A Global Convergence Theory for General Trust-Region-Based Algorithms for Equality Constrained Optimization , 1997, SIAM J. Optim..

[17]  T Haftka Raphael,et al.  Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments , 1996 .

[18]  Srinivas Kodiyalam,et al.  Initial Results of an MDO Method Evaluation Study , 1998 .

[19]  E. Omojokun.  Trust region algorithms for optimization with nonlinear equality and inequality constraints , 1990 .

[20]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Structural sizing by generalized, multilevel optimization , 1987 .

[21]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  An algorithm for solving the system-level problem in multilevel optimization , 1994 .

[22]  J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  A linear decomposition method for large optimization problems. Blueprint for development , 1982 .

[23]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Numerical difficulties associated with using equality constraints to achieve multi-level decomposition in structural optimization , 1986 .

[24]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Essential Elements of Computational Algorithms for Aerodynamic Analysis and Design , 1997 .

[25]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Collaborative Approach to Launch Vehicle Design , 1997 .