Ten Men and Women Got Married Today: Noun Coordination and the Intersective Theory of Conjunction

Œe word and can be used both intersectively, as in John lies and cheats, and collectively, as in John and Mary met. Research has tried to determine which one of these two meanings is basic. Focusing on coordination of nouns (liar and cheat), this paper argues that the basic meaning of and is intersective. Œis theory has been successfully applied to coordination of other kinds of constituents (Partee & Rooth, 1983; Winter, 2001). Certain cases of noun coordination (men and women) challenge this view and have therefore been argued to favor the collective theory (Heycock & Zamparelli, 2005). Œe main result of this paper is that the intersective theory actually predicts the collective behavior of and in men and women. And leads to collectivity by interacting with silent operators involving set minimization and choice functions, which have been postulated to account for phenomena involving inde€nites, collective predicates, and coordinations of noun phrases (Winter, 2001). Œis paper also shows that the collective theory does not generalize to coordinations of noun phrases in the way it has been previously suggested.

[1]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type‐shifting Principles , 2008 .

[2]  Martin Haspelmath.  Nominal and verbal conjunction , 2013 .

[3]  Irene Heim,et al.  File Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Definiteness , 2008 .

[4]  T. Zimmermann.  Free Choice Disjunction and Epistemic Possibility , 2000 .

[5]  Robin Cooper,et al.  The interpretation of pronouns , 1997 .

[6]  Fred Landman,et al.  Events and Plurality: The Jerusalem Lectures , 2001 .

[7]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  A cross-categorial semantics for coordination , 1980 .

[8]  A. Cohen,et al.  Between Kinds and Properties: Bare Plurals across Languages , 2007 .

[9]  Jack Hoeksema,et al.  The Semantics of Non-Boolean "And" , 1988, J. Semant..

[10]  David R. Dowty.  Type Raising, Functional Composition, and Non-Constituent Conjunction , 1988 .

[11]  Godehard Link.  The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice‐theoretical Approach , 2008 .

[12]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Semantik : ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung = Semantics : an international handbook of contemporary research , 1991 .

[13]  Benjamin Spector.  Aspects of the Pragmatics of Plural Morphology: On Higher-Order Implicatures , 2007 .

[14]  Bernhard Schwarz,et al.  Long Distance Indefinites and Choice Functions , 2011, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[15]  Y. Winter,et al.  Choice Functions and the Scopal Semantics of Indefinites , 1997 .

[16]  Anna Szabolcsi,et al.  Quantifier particles and compositionality , 2013 .

[17]  K Manfred,et al.  FOUR THOUSAND SHIPS PASSED THROUGH THE LOCK: OBJECT-INDUCED MEASURE FUNCTIONS ON EVENTS , 1990 .

[18]  Michael Ruisdael Bennett,et al.  Some extensions of a montague fragment of English , 1974 .

[19]  Floris Roelofsen,et al.  Alternatives in Montague grammar , 2015 .

[20]  Irene Heim,et al.  41. Definiteness and indefiniteness , 2011 .

[21]  B. Carpenter,et al.  Type-Logical Semantics , 1997 .

[22]  Merrie Bergmann.  Cross-categorial semantics for conjoined common nouns , 1982 .

[23]  Mary Dalrymple,et al.  Determiner agreement and noun conjunction , 2004, Journal of Linguistics.

[24]  Bert Le Bruyn,et al.  Bare coordination: the semantic shift , 2014 .

[25]  Katherine McKinney-Bock,et al.  Deriving Split-Antecedent Relative Clauses , 2013 .

[26]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  Mismatching Meanings in Brain and Behavior , 2008, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[27]  A. Tarski,et al.  Zur Grundlegung der Boole'schen Algebra. I , 1935 .

[28]  Pauline Jacobson.  Towards a Variable-Free Semantics , 1999 .

[29]  Yoad Winter,et al.  Syncategorematic Conjunction and Structured Meanings , 1995 .

[30]  L. T. F. Gamut.  Logic, language, and meaning , 1991 .

[31]  T. Reinhart.  Quantifier Scope: How labor is Divided Between QR and Choice Functions , 1997 .

[32]  B. Partee.  Montague Grammar and Transformational Grammar. , 1975 .

[33]  Lucas Champollion,et al.  The interaction of compositional semantics and event semantics , 2015 .

[34]  Anna Szabolcsi,et al.  What do quantifier particles do? , 2015 .

[35]  Margit Bowler.  Conjunction and disjunction in a language without 'and' , 2014 .

[36]  Eytan Zweig,et al.  Number-neutral bare plurals and the multiplicity implicature , 2009 .

[37]  D. Fox.  Free Choice and the Theory of Scalar Implicatures , 2007 .

[38]  Floris Roelofsen,et al.  Algebraic foundations for the semantic treatment of inquisitive content , 2013, Synthese.

[39]  Paul Portner,et al.  Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning , 2011 .

[40]  Richard Montague,et al.  The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English , 1973 .

[41]  U. Sauerland,et al.  Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics , 2007 .

[42]  Anthony S. Kroch,et al.  The semantics of scope in English , 1979 .

[43]  Focus and Presupposition in Multi-Speaker Discourse , 1999 .

[44]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Approaches to Natural Language , 1973 .

[45]  F. Landman.  Indefinites and the type of sets , 2004 .

[46]  M. Baltin.  Chapter 25. Extraposition , 2007 .

[47]  Godehard Link.  Algebraic semantics in language and philosophy , 1997 .

[48]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Some Remarks on Choice Functions and LF-Movement , 2000 .

[49]  Association Focus , 1999 .

[50]  Friederike Moltmann.  Parts and Wholes in Semantics , 1997 .

[51]  Michael Franke,et al.  Quantity implicatures, exhaustive interpretation, and rational conversation , 2011 .

[52]  Irene Heim,et al.  Semantics in generative grammar , 1998 .

[53]  Lucas Champollion,et al.  Move and accommodate: A solution to Haddock's puzzle , 2011 .

[54]  Adrian Brasoveanu.  Modified Numerals as Post-Suppositions , 2013, J. Semant..

[55]  Yoad Winter,et al.  Atoms and Sets: A Characterization of Semantic Number , 2002, Linguistic Inquiry.

[56]  Van Fraassen,et al.  Facts and Tautological Entailments , 1969 .

[57]  Godehard Link,et al.  Generalized Quantifiers and Plurals , 1987 .

[58]  E. G. Ruys,et al.  The scope of indefinites , 1992 .

[59]  Barry Schein,et al.  'And': Conjunction Reduction Redux , 2017 .

[60]  L. M. Faltz,et al.  Boolean semantics for natural language , 1984 .

[61]  Greg N. Carlson,et al.  Same and different: Some consequences for syntax and semantics , 1987 .

[62]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Reference to Kinds across Language , 1998 .

[63]  Steven Abney,et al.  The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect , 1972 .

[64]  Kit Fine,et al.  Counterfactuals Without Possible Worlds , 2012 .

[65]  Yoad Winter,et al.  Flexibility Principles in Boolean Semantics: The Interpretation of Coordination, Plurality, and Scope in Natural Language , 2002, Computational Linguistics.

[66]  Bernhard Schwarz,et al.  Two kinds of long-distance indefinites , 2001 .

[67]  Philippe Schlenker,et al.  Ontological Symmetry in Language: A Brief Manifesto , 2006 .

[68]  G. Corbett.  The agreement hierarchy , 1979, Journal of Linguistics.

[69]  C. Barker.  Parasitic scope , 2007 .

[70]  J. Barwise,et al.  Generalized quantifiers and natural language , 1981 .

[71]  Kathryn Davidson,et al.  'And' or 'or': General use coordination in ASL , 2013 .

[72]  Caroline Heycock,et al.  Friends and Colleagues: Plurality, Coordination, and the Structure of DP , 2005 .

[73]  Peter Lasersohn.  Plurality, Conjunction and Events , 1994 .

[74]  Mats Rooth,et al.  Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity , 2008 .

[75]  Christian Barker,et al.  Free choice permission as resource-sensitive reasoning. , 2010 .

[76]  Corien Bary,et al.  Temporal anaphora across and inside sentences: The function of participles , 2011 .

[77]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Bare NPs: Kind-referring, Indefinites, Both, or Neither? , 2003 .

[78]  Östen Dahl,et al.  Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution : zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aspektklassen , 1991 .

[79]  Rainer Schubert,et al.  A mathematical analysis of theories of parthood , 2006, Data Knowl. Eng..