Deterministic parsing and subjacency

Abstract It has previously been claimed that a deterministic model of the human sentence parsing mechanism provides an explanation for the existence of, and some of the properties of, the subjacency constraint on natural languages. The present paper argues that the empirical arguments offered in support of these claims are flawed, and that in any case the explanatory relationship between determinism and subjacency is weak.

[1]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Conditions on transformations , 1971 .

[2]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance: Language Use and Acquisition , 1986 .

[3]  Janet Dean Fodor.  Learnability and parsability: A reply to Culicover , 1984 .

[4]  Janet Dean Fodor.  Does Performance Shape Competence , 1981 .

[5]  Edward P. Stabler,et al.  Berwick and Weinberg on linguistics and computational psychology , 1984, Cognition.

[6]  Mitchell P. Marcus,et al.  D-Theory: Talking about Talking about Trees , 1983, ACL.

[7]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Phrase structure parsing and the island constraints , 1983 .

[8]  Emmanuel N. Kwofie.  Adjectives in the syntactic description of French , 1978 .

[9]  Kenneth Wexler,et al.  Formal Principles of Language Acquisition , 1980 .

[10]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Constraints on gaps: is the parser a significant influence? , 1983 .

[11]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Natural language parsing: How can grammars help parsers? , 1985 .

[12]  Laurie A. Stowe,et al.  Models of gap-location in the human language processor , 1983 .

[13]  C. Clifton,et al.  Filling gaps: Decision principles and structure in sentence comprehension , 1983, Cognition.

[14]  Annie Zaenen,et al.  A Phrase Structure Account of Scandinavian Extraction Phenomena , 1982 .

[15]  Ewan Klein,et al.  Type-driven translation , 1985 .

[16]  R. Berwick,et al.  The role of grammars in models of language use , 1983, Cognition.

[17]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Lexical Expectations in Sentence Comprehension. , 1984 .

[18]  Mitchell P. Marcus,et al.  A theory of syntactic recognition for natural language , 1979 .

[19]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Unbounded Dependencies and Coordinate Structure , 1981 .

[20]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Generalized phrase structure grammar : a theoretical synopsis , 1982 .

[21]  H E Wanner,et al.  An ATN approach to comprehension , 1978 .

[22]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[23]  E. Wanner.  The ATN and the sausage machine: Which one is baloney? , 1980, Cognition.

[24]  Paul Schachter,et al.  Auxiliary reduction: an argument for GPSG , 1984 .

[25]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  Janet D. Fodor,et al.  The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model , 1978, Cognition.

[27]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  Syntactic Constraints and Efficient Parsability , 1983, ACL.

[28]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Is the human sentence parsing mechanism an ATN? , 1980, Cognition.

[29]  J. Kimball.  Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language , 1973 .

[30]  L. Rizzi.  Violations of the WH Island Constraint in Italian and the Subjacency Condition , 1980 .

[31]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  On Wh-Movement , 1977 .