Despotic Leadership and Ideological Manipulation at Theranos: Towards a theory of hegemonic totalism in the workplace

This paper addresses despotic leadership and ideological manipulation in the workplace, and explores their detrimental consequences for employees and other stakeholders. The notion of ‘hegemonic totalism’ is advanced to account for how employees are often subordinated to the will of powerful elites. Our argument is illustrated through a case study of Theranos, a high prolife Silicon Valley bio-tech company that promised a revolution in healthcare diagnostics but which was declared bankrupt in 2018. Its once much feted founding CEO, Elizabeth Holmes, has been sentenced to eleven years in prison for fraud. Analysis of empirical material on the company illustrates how business leaders may engage in despotic practices, while simultaneously invoking apparently positive ideals to enforce the performance of consent by employees. Following an exploration of the paradoxes and pathologies of hegemonic totalism, our study identifies three primary countervailing forces that act to limit its effects.

[1]  L. Ozarraga.  A Review on Monbiot’s “Neoliberalism – The Ideology at the Root of All Our Problems” , 2023, International Journal of Social Science Research and Review.

[2]  Olof Hallonsten.  The ‘yawning abyss’ between surface and substance: Organizational life as ‘pseudo-reality’ , 2022, Scandinavian Journal of Management.

[3]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  The Dark Side of Strong Identification in Organizations: A Conceptual Review , 2022, Academy of Management Annals.

[4]  David Courpasson,et al.  Resistance as a Way of Life: How a group of workers perpetuated insubordination to neoliberal management , 2022, Organization Studies.

[5]  K. Kenny,et al.  The Costs and Labour of Whistleblowing: Bodily Vulnerability and Post-disclosure Survival , 2021, Journal of Business Ethics.

[6]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Hyper-Management: Neoliberal Expansions of Purpose and Leadership , 2021, Organization Theory.

[7]  Markus A. Höllerer,et al.  What Theory Is and Can Be: Forms of Theorizing in Organizational Scholarship , 2021, Organization Theory.

[8]  G. Davis.  Corporate Purpose Needs Democracy , 2021, Journal of Management Studies.

[9]  S. Clegg,et al.  Watchers, Watched, and Watching in the Digital Age: Reconceptualization of Information Technology Monitoring as Complex Action Nets , 2021 .

[10]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Pre-understanding: An interpretation-enhancer and horizon-expander in research , 2021, Organization Studies.

[11]  Rebecca Piekkari,et al.  From Templates to Heuristics: How and Why to Move Beyond the Gioia Methodology , 2020, Organizational Research Methods.

[12]  C. Mayer.  The Future of the Corporation and the Economics of Purpose , 2020, Journal of Management Studies.

[13]  M. Gentile.  Twilight of democracy: the seductive lure of authoritarianism , 2020, Eurasian Geography and Economics.

[14]  F. Palpacuer,et al.  Resisting Via Hybrid Spaces: The Cascade Effect of a Workplace Struggle Against Neoliberal Hegemony , 2020, Journal of Management Inquiry.

[15]  C. Steyaert,et al.  Affective Control in New Collaborative Work: Communal Fantasies of Purpose, Growth and Belonging , 2020, Organization Studies.

[16]  Margaret Gilbert,et al.  ‘There is a crack in everything’: An ethnographic study of pragmatic resistance in a manufacturing organization , 2020, Human Relations.

[17]  J. Edmonstone.  Hubristic leadership , 2020, Action Learning: Research and Practice.

[18]  Xiao-ping Chen,et al.  We have emotions but can’t show them! Authoritarian leadership, emotion suppression climate, and team performance , 2020 .

[19]  Alessandro Delfanti,et al.  Machinic dispossession and augmented despotism: Digital work in an Amazon warehouse , 2019, New Media Soc..

[20]  David Courpasson,et al.  Body Breakdowns as Politics: Identity regulation in a high-commitment activist organization , 2019, Organization Studies.

[21]  L. Dundes,et al.  Bad Witches: Gender and the Downfall of Elizabeth Holmes of Theranos and Disney’s Maleficent , 2019, Social Sciences.

[22]  Emeril Santander,et al.  Book Review: Bad Blood – Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup , 2019, University of Ottawa Journal of Medicine.

[23]  Laura M. Giurge,et al.  Does power corrupt the mind? The influence of power on moral reasoning and self-interested behavior , 2019 .

[24]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Stealth research: Lack of peer‐reviewed evidence from healthcare unicorns , 2019, European journal of clinical investigation.

[25]  K. Kenny.  Whistleblowing , 2019, Professional Conduct Casebook.

[26]  C. Peus,et al.  Shedding Light on Leaders’ Self-Interest: Theory and Measurement of Exploitative Leadership , 2019 .

[27]  Ajnesh Prasad,et al.  Sex-based harassment and organizational silencing: How women are led to reluctant acquiescence in academia , 2018, Human Relations.

[28]  David L. Collinson,et al.  ‘No More Heroes’: Critical Perspectives on Leadership Romanticism , 2018 .

[29]  P. Harms,et al.  Autocratic leaders and authoritarian followers revisited: A review and agenda for the future. , 2017 .

[30]  S. Ybema,et al.  Resistance Through Compliance: The Strategic and Subversive Potential of Frontstage and Backstage Resistance , 2017 .

[31]  I. Munro.  Whistle-blowing and the politics of truth: Mobilizing ‘truth games’ in the WikiLeaks case , 2017 .

[32]  David L. Collinson,et al.  Resistance through Difference: The Co-Constitution of Dissent and Inclusion , 2017 .

[33]  J. Ford,et al.  Towards a Performative Theory of Resistance: Senior Managers and Revolting Subject(ivitie)s , 2017 .

[34]  G. Hanlon.  Digging deeper towards capricious management: ‘Personal traits become part of the means of production’ , 2017 .

[35]  Dennis Tourish,et al.  The critical incident technique reappraised: Using critical incidents to illuminate organizational practices and build theory , 2016 .

[36]  András Tilcsik,et al.  When Experts Become Liabilities: Domain Experts on Boards and Organizational Failure , 2016 .

[37]  Katherine K. Chen.  Using Extreme Cases to Understand Organizations , 2015 .

[38]  E. Diamandis.  Theranos phenomenon: promises and fallacies , 2015, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[39]  P. Fleming.  Resisting Work: The Corporatization of Life and Its Discontents , 2014 .

[40]  Martin Parker,et al.  University, Ltd: Changing a business school , 2014 .

[41]  Laura J. Spence,et al.  Contesting the Value of “Creating Shared Value” , 2014 .

[42]  Zoe Strachan.  Thicker than water , 2014, Current Biology.

[43]  P. Fleming,et al.  Power in Management and Organization Science , 2014 .

[44]  H. Willmott.  ‘The Substitution of One Piece of Nonsense for Another’: Reflections on Resistance, Gaming, and Subjugation , 2013 .

[45]  D. Tourish.  The Dark Side of Transformational Leadership: A Critical Perspective , 2013 .

[46]  A. Contu,et al.  Multinational corporations’ politics and resistance to plant shutdowns: A comparative case study in the south of France , 2013 .

[47]  M. Weber,et al.  The Sociology of Charismatic Authority , 2013 .

[48]  M. Burawoy.  The Roots of Domination: Beyond Bourdieu and Gramsci , 2012 .

[49]  F. Pemer,et al.  The appropriated language: Dominant stories as a source of organizational inertia , 2012 .

[50]  Abz Sharma,et al.  Narrative, drama and charismatic leadership: The case of Apple’s Steve Jobs , 2011 .

[51]  Rick Iedema,et al.  The Undecided Space of Ethics in Organizational Surveillance , 2010 .

[52]  S. M. Suibhne.  Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and other Inmates , 2009 .

[53]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development , 2007 .

[54]  Christopher Kollmeyer,et al.  Bringing Gramsci back in: labor control in Italy's new temporary help industry , 2007 .

[55]  Robert Hogan,et al.  The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. , 2007 .

[56]  S. Einarsen,et al.  Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model. , 2007 .

[57]  Eero Vaara,et al.  Struggling over subjectivity: A discursive analysis of strategic development in an engineering group , 2007 .

[58]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Why is Organization Theory so Ignorant? The Neglect of Total Institutions , 2006 .

[59]  Gustavo Grodnitzky,et al.  The Allure of Toxic Leaders , 2006 .

[60]  G. Sewell,et al.  Coercion Versus Care: Using Irony to Make Sense of Organizational Surveillance , 2006 .

[61]  S. Clegg.  The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies , 2006 .

[62]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[63]  Manfred F. R. Kets de Vries,et al.  The spirit of despotism: Understanding the tyrant within , 2006 .

[64]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[65]  Andrew D. Brown.  Making sense of the collapse of Barings Bank , 2005 .

[66]  Steven T. Petra,et al.  Do outside independent directors strengthen corporate boards , 2005 .

[67]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual , 2002 .

[68]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Power, Control And Resistance In "The Factory That Time Forgot" , 2001 .

[69]  Thomas W. Lee,et al.  Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research , 1998 .

[70]  D. Mumby.  The problem of hegemony: Rereading Gramsci for organizational communication studies , 1997 .

[71]  Hugh Wilimoft,et al.  Management and Organization Studies as Science? , 1997 .

[72]  O. Shenkar,et al.  The Firm as a Total Institution: Reflections on the Chinese State Enterprise , 1996 .

[73]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Petty Tyranny in Organizations , 1994 .

[74]  M. Duffy,et al.  The organization man. , 1994, Time.

[75]  H. Willmott.  STRENGTH IS IGNORANCE; SLAVERY IS FREEDOM: MANAGING CULTURE IN MODERN ORGANIZATIONS* , 1993 .

[76]  G. Kunda,et al.  Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation , 1993 .

[77]  Howard S. Schwartz,et al.  Narcissistic process and corporate decay : the theory of the organization ideal , 1991 .

[78]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[79]  C. Mouffe,et al.  Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics , 1988 .

[80]  M. Hamilton.  The Elements of the Concept of Ideology , 1987 .

[81]  M. Burawoy.  Between the Labor Process and the State: The Changing Face of Factory Regimes Under Advanced Capitalism , 1983 .

[82]  James Satterwhite,et al.  Main currents of marxism , 1981 .

[83]  D. Mcclelland.  Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism , 1962 .

[84]  E. Voegelin.  The Origins of Totalitarianism , 2020, On Violence.

[85]  Jiska Engelbert,et al.  Social construction of reality , 2016 .

[86]  Katharina Weiss,et al.  On Nineteen Eighty Four , 2016 .

[87]  E. Schadt,et al.  Evaluation of direct-to-consumer low-volume lab tests in healthy adults. , 2016, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[88]  Geoffrey Nowell‐Smith,et al.  Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci , 2015 .

[89]  D. Buchanan.  Case Studies in Organizational Research , 2012 .

[90]  Richard Shorten.  Modernism and Totalitarianism , 2012 .

[91]  W. Chase.  Bad leadership. , 2010, Dental assistant.

[92]  M. Haugaard.  Power and Hegemony , 2009 .

[93]  Jeffrey C. Kohles,et al.  Romance of Leadership , 2009 .

[94]  Adam Kowol.  The theory of cognitive dissonance By , 2008 .

[95]  H. Stein.  Organizational Totalitarianism and the Voices of Dissent , 2007 .

[96]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Revisiting Metaphors of Organizational Communication , 2006 .

[97]  Ron Weber,et al.  The Reflexive Researcher , 2003 .

[98]  David L. Collinson.  Strategies of resistance: power, knowledge and subjectivity in the workplace , 1994 .

[99]  M. Burawoy.  The Politics of Production , 1985 .

[100]  A. Gouldner.  The dialectic of ideology and technology , 1976 .

[101]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  Reproduction in education, society and culture , 1970 .