Wireless structural control using multi‐step TDMA communication patterning bandwidth allocation

Summary As the number of sensors in a control network grows, it becomes increasingly difficult to transmit all sensor data during a single control step over the fixed wireless bandwidth. Because control force calculations rely on accurate state measurements or estimates, the use of staggered data communication may become necessary. It is not uncommon that a single sensor may be the only measurement source for an important section of a structure. This paper presents a means of selecting and evaluating different communication group sizes and wireless unit combinations for staggered communication that still provide information for highly accurate state estimates. Within each wireless unit, multiple estimator gains are stored on-board to perform state-estimation calculations using staggered data that may be received from different combinations of units. It is found that, in staggered communication schemes, state estimation and control performance are affected by the network topology used at each time step with some sensor combinations providing more useful information than others. Sensor placement theory is used to form sensor groups that provide consistently high-quality output information to the network over multiple time steps, so as to strategically report data from all sensors.

[1]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  Strategic Network Utilization in a Wireless Structural Control System for Seismically Excited Structures , 2009 .

[2]  Kung-Chun Lu,et al.  A damage detection algorithm integrated with a wireless sensing system , 2011 .

[3]  Yang Wang,et al.  Structural Control with Multi-Subnet Wireless Sensing Feedback: Experimental Validation of Time-Delayed Decentralized H* Control Design , 2011 .

[4]  Ramesh Govindan,et al.  Monitoring civil structures with a wireless sensor network , 2006, IEEE Internet Computing.

[5]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  Decentralized civil structural control using real-time wireless sensing and embedded computing , 2007 .

[6]  Guang-Dong Zhou,et al.  Energy‐aware wireless sensor placement in structural health monitoring using hybrid discrete firefly algorithm , 2015 .

[7]  D. T. Wu,et al.  A New Decentralized Control Approach with Application to the ASCE Benchmark Control Problem under Earthquake Excitation , 2010 .

[8]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring Using Modular Wireless Sensors , 2003 .

[9]  Zhicong Chen,et al.  Energy harvesting and power management of wireless sensors for structural control applications in civil engineering , 2012 .

[10]  Elbert Hendricks,et al.  Linear Control System Design , 2009 .

[11]  Yang Wang Time‐delayed dynamic output feedback ℋ︁∞ controller design for civil structures: A decentralized approach through homotopic transformation , 2011 .

[12]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  Automated Modal Parameter Estimation by Parallel Processing within Wireless Monitoring Systems , 2008 .

[13]  Zhicong Chen,et al.  An active mass damper system for structural control using real-time wireless sensors , 2012 .

[14]  Francesco Bullo,et al.  Controllability Metrics, Limitations and Algorithms for Complex Networks , 2014, IEEE Trans. Control. Netw. Syst..

[15]  Zhicong Chen,et al.  A multi‐channel wireless connection system for structural health monitoring applications , 2011 .

[16]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  Embedding damage detection algorithms in a wireless sensing unit for operational power efficiency , 2004 .

[17]  Paul J. A. Kenis,et al.  Chemical engineering at... the university of illinois at urbana-champaign , 2009 .

[18]  Zhicong Chen,et al.  A low‐noise, real‐time, wireless data acquisition system for structural monitoring applications , 2014 .

[19]  Yang Wang,et al.  A double homotopy approach for decentralized H∞ control of civil structures , 2014 .

[20]  Fayaz R. Rofooei,et al.  Decentralized control of tall buildings , 2006 .

[21]  R. Andrew Swartz,et al.  Reduced-order modal-domain structural control for seismic vibration control over wireless sensor networks , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference.

[22]  Hamid Reza Karimi,et al.  Semi-decentralized strategies in structural vibration control , 2011 .

[23]  Juergen Hahn,et al.  Determining Optimal Sensor Locations for State and Parameter Estimation for Stable Nonlinear Systems , 2005 .

[24]  ZhiCong Chen,et al.  Energy efficiency strategy for a general real-time wireless sensor platform , 2014 .

[25]  Chia-Ming Chang,et al.  Experimental verification of a wireless sensing and control system for structural control using MR dampers , 2007 .

[26]  Zhicong Chen,et al.  In-Situ Validation of a Wireless Data Acquisition System by Monitoring a Pedestrian Bridge , 2015 .

[27]  Manuel Mazo,et al.  Decentralized Event-Triggered Control Over Wireless Sensor/Actuator Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[28]  Lucia Faravelli,et al.  Sensor placement driven by a model order reduction (MOR) reasoning , 2014 .

[29]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  Decentralized H ∞ Controller Design for Large-scale Civil Structures , 2008 .

[30]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Low-Latency Data Acquisition Hardware for Real-Time Wireless Sensor Applications , 2015, IEEE Sensors Journal.