Unanticipated Antigens: Translation Initiation at CUG with Leucine

Major histocompatibility class I molecules display tens of thousands of peptides on the cell surface for immune surveillance by T cells. The peptide repertoire represents virtually all cellular translation products, and can thus reveal a foreign presence inside the cell. These peptides are derived from not only conventional but also cryptic translational reading frames, including some without conventional AUG codons. To define the mechanism that generates these cryptic peptides, we used T cells as probes to analyze the peptides generated in transfected cells. We found that when CUG acts as an alternate initiation codon, it can be decoded as leucine rather than the expected methionine residue. The leucine start does not depend on an internal ribosome entry site–like mRNA structure, and its efficiency is enhanced by the Kozak nucleotide context. Furthermore, ribosomes scan 5′ to 3′ specifically for the CUG initiation codon in a eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2–independent manner. Because eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 is frequently targeted to inhibit protein synthesis, this novel translation mechanism allows stressed cells to display antigenic peptides. This initiation mechanism could also be used at non-AUG initiation codons often found in viral transcripts as well as in a growing list of cellular genes.

[1]  Han-kuei Huang,et al.  GTP hydrolysis controls stringent selection of the AUG start codon during translation initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Genes & development.

[2]  P. Rohrlich,et al.  Identification of Cryptic MHC I–restricted Epitopes Encoded by HIV-1 Alternative Reading Frames , 2004, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[3]  D. Kolakofsky,et al.  Positions +5 and +6 can be major determinants of the efficiency of non‐AUG initiation codons for protein synthesis. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[4]  A. Cigan,et al.  Mutations at a Zn(II) finger motif in the yeast elF-2β gene alter ribosomal start-site selection during the scanning process , 1988, Cell.

[5]  N. Nakashima,et al.  Methionine-independent initiation of translation in the capsid protein of an insect RNA virus. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  N. Shastri,et al.  Alloreactive CD8+ T cells can recognize unusual, rare, and unique processed peptide/MHC complexes. , 1996, Journal of immunology.

[7]  N. Shastri,et al.  Producing nature's gene-chips: the generation of peptides for display by MHC class I molecules. , 2002, Annual review of immunology.

[8]  V. Engelhard,et al.  Structure of peptides associated with class I and class II MHC molecules. , 1994, Annual review of immunology.

[9]  M. Kavanaugh,et al.  Truncated Forms of the Dual Function Human ASCT2 Neutral Amino Acid Transporter/Retroviral Receptor Are Translationally Initiated at Multiple Alternative CUG and GUG Codons* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  M. Kozak.  An analysis of 5'-noncoding sequences from 699 vertebrate messenger RNAs. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  H. Rammensee,et al.  Peptides naturally presented by MHC class I molecules. , 1993, Annual review of immunology.

[12]  M. Kozak,et al.  At least six nucleotides preceding the AUG initiator codon enhance translation in mammalian cells. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  M. Kozak.  The scanning model for translation: an update , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  P. Paz,et al.  Minors held by majors: the H13 minor histocompatibility locus defined as a peptide/MHC class I complex. , 1997, Immunity.

[15]  Shu-Bing Qian,et al.  Quantitating protein synthesis, degradation, and endogenous antigen processing. , 2003, Immunity.

[16]  N. Shastri,et al.  Constitutive Display of Cryptic Translation Products by MHC Class I Molecules , 2003, Science.

[17]  A. Townsend,et al.  Antigen recognition by class I-restricted T lymphocytes. , 1989, Annual review of immunology.

[18]  G. D. Spotts,et al.  Translational activation of the non-AUG-initiated c-myc 1 protein at high cell densities due to methionine deprivation. , 1992, Genes & development.

[19]  U. RajBhandary,et al.  Initiator tRNAs and Initiation of Protein Synthesis , 1995 .

[20]  L. Eisenlohr,et al.  Initiation Codon Scanthrough versus Termination Codon Readthrough Demonstrates Strong Potential for Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I–restricted Cryptic Epitope Expression , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[21]  M. Kozak.  Structural features in eukaryotic mRNAs that modulate the initiation of translation. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[22]  R. Kaufman.  13 The Double-stranded RNA-activated Protein Kinase PKR , 2000 .

[23]  M. Kozak,et al.  Circumstances and mechanisms of inhibition of translation by secondary structure in eucaryotic mRNAs , 1989, Molecular and cellular biology.

[24]  R. Jagus,et al.  Use of vertical slab isoelectric focusing and immunoblotting to evaluate steady-state phosphorylation of eIF2 alpha in cultured cells. , 1997, Methods.

[25]  M. Brostrom,et al.  Regulation of translational initiation during cellular responses to stress. , 1998, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[26]  D. Peabody,et al.  Translation initiation at non-AUG triplets in mammalian cells. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[27]  C. Figdor,et al.  A Human Minor Histocompatibility Antigen Specific for B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[28]  Dieter Söll,et al.  Trna: Structure, Biosynthesis, and Function , 1995 .

[29]  P. Kloetzel.  Generation of major histocompatibility complex class I antigens: functional interplay between proteasomes and TPPII , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[30]  R. Jackson,et al.  The immediate downstream codon strongly influences the efficiency of utilization of eukaryotic translation initiation codons. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[31]  N. Shastri,et al.  The role of MHC class I molecules in the generation of endogenous peptide/MHC complexes. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[32]  P. Sarnow,et al.  Factorless ribosome assembly on the internal ribosome entry site of cricket paralysis virus. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  N. Shastri,et al.  A rare cryptic translation product is presented by Kb major histocompatibility complex class I molecule to alloreactive T cells , 1995, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[34]  P. Sarnow,et al.  Initiation of Protein Synthesis from the A Site of the Ribosome , 2000, Cell.

[35]  N. Shastri,et al.  Presentation of out-of-frame peptide/MHC class I complexes by a novel translation initiation mechanism. , 1999, Immunity.

[36]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  Translational control of gene expression , 2000 .

[37]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Post-proteasomal antigen processing for major histocompatibility complex class I presentation , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[38]  W. Green,et al.  Non-traditionally derived CTL epitopes: exceptions that prove the rules? , 1998, Immunology today.

[39]  R. Eisenman,et al.  A non-AUG translational initiation in c-myc exon 1 generates an N-terminally distinct protein whose synthesis is disrupted in Burkitt's lymphomas , 1988, Cell.

[40]  M. Kozak.  Influences of mRNA secondary structure on initiation by eukaryotic ribosomes. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  N. Shastri,et al.  ER aminopeptidases generate a unique pool of peptides for MHC class I molecules , 2001, Nature Immunology.

[42]  F. Triebel,et al.  A non-AUG-defined alternative open reading frame of the intestinal carboxyl esterase mRNA generates an epitope recognized by renal cell carcinoma-reactive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in situ. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[43]  P. Cresswell,et al.  Mechanisms of MHC class I--restricted antigen processing. , 1998, Annual review of immunology.

[44]  J. Hershey,et al.  2 The Pathway and Mechanism of Initiation of Protein Synthesis , 2000 .

[45]  Mark M Davis,et al.  T cell killing does not require the formation of a stable mature immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[46]  L. Eisenlohr,et al.  Ribosomal scanning past the primary initiation codon as a mechanism for expression of CTL epitopes encoded in alternative reading frames , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[47]  M. Kozak,et al.  Downstream secondary structure facilitates recognition of initiator codons by eukaryotic ribosomes. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  N. Shastri,et al.  LacZ inducible, antigen/MHC-specific T cell hybrids. , 1994, International immunology.