Stability of a Switched Mode Power Amplifier Interface for Power Hardware-in-the-Loop

Power hardware-in-the-loop (PHIL) is an attractive, real-time system testing and validation technique. Virtual models can be replaced with physical equipment to emulate system integration testing, and perform model validation without the cost and risk of a full scale power system. Power amplifiers are the principal components that facilitate the power interface between the physical and the virtual systems. This necessary interfacing introduces dynamics that do not exist in the real system and is the source of stability and accuracy issues affecting PHIL applications. This paper presents a stability analysis of a practical PHIL system based on the ideal transformer model interface algorithm that utilizes a voltage source converter for power amplification. A systematic approach to evaluate the expected stability characteristics of PHIL experiments is developed. The analysis in this paper shows that in a practical system, the power amplifier's filter, sampling, and measurement filtering are all shown to influence the stability in a counterintuitive way, leading to a nonmonotonic stability characteristic. An experimental PHIL platform based on a real-time digital simulator real-time computer has been used to validate the analysis and confirm the effects of the practical interface. Switching dead-time is also shown to have a significant stabilizing effect.

[1]  Karl Schoder,et al.  Power hardware-in-the-loop testing of a 500 kW photovoltaic array inverter , 2012, IECON 2012 - 38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[2]  Felix Lehfuss,et al.  The Limitations of Digital Simulation and the Advantages of PHIL Testing in Studying Distributed Generation Provision of Ancillary Services , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[3]  Felix Lehfuss,et al.  Power hardware-in-the-loop implementation and verification of a real time capable battery model , 2014, 2014 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE).

[4]  Alexander Viehweider,et al.  Stabilization of Power Hardware-in-the-Loop simulations of electric energy systems , 2011, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[5]  Antonello Monti,et al.  Online Parametric Identification of Power Impedances to Improve Stability and Accuracy of Power Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulations , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[6]  Alexander Viehweider,et al.  Interface and Stability Issues for SISO and MIMO Power Hardware in the Loop Simulation of Distribution Networks with Photovoltaic Generation , 2012 .

[7]  C Dufour,et al.  Interfacing Issues in Real-Time Digital Simulators , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[8]  Nikos D. Hatziargyriou,et al.  Methods for stability and accuracy evaluation of power hardware in the loop simulations , 2014 .

[9]  Rudi Wierckx,et al.  Stability and accuracy evaluation of a power hardware in the loop (PHIL) interface with a photovoltaic micro-inverter , 2015, IECON 2015 - 41st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[10]  Karl Schoder,et al.  Role of Power Hardware in the Loop in Modeling and Simulation for Experimentation in Power and Energy Systems , 2015, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  Michael Steurer,et al.  A Megawatt-Scale Power Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation Setup for Motor Drives , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[12]  M. Steurer,et al.  Improve the Stability and the Accuracy of Power Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation by Selecting Appropriate Interface Algorithms , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[13]  Nikos D. Hatziargyriou,et al.  Improving existing methods for stable and more accurate Power Hardware-in-the-Loop experiments , 2017, 2017 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE).

[14]  Alexander Viehweider,et al.  Power hardware in the loop simulation with feedback current filtering for electric systems , 2011, IECON 2011 - 37th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[15]  Felix Lehfuss,et al.  Comparison of multiple power amplification types for power Hardware-in-the-Loop applications , 2012, 2012 Complexity in Engineering (COMPENG). Proceedings.

[16]  C. S. Edrington,et al.  Investigation of HIL interfaces in nonlinear load studies , 2012, 2012 North American Power Symposium (NAPS).

[17]  F. Ponci,et al.  Design and implementation of a power-hardware-in-the-loop interface: a nonlinear load case study , 2005, Twentieth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2005. APEC 2005..

[18]  Karl Schoder,et al.  Characteristics and Design of Power Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulations for Electrical Power Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[19]  Enrico Santi,et al.  Improved power hardware-in-the-loop interface algorithm using wideband system identification , 2014, 2014 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition - APEC 2014.

[20]  Karl Schoder,et al.  Megawatt-scale power hardware-in-the-loop simulation testing of a power conversion module for naval applications , 2015, 2015 IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium (ESTS).

[21]  Antonello Monti,et al.  Wideband identification of impedance to improve accuracy and stability of power-hardware-in-the-loop simulations , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS).