Science-policy interface for addressing environmental problems in arid Spain

a b s t r a c t Science–policy interfaces are avenues for finding solutions for environmental challenges through strengthening collaborations between research disciplines and public administrations. Here we present a methodology for the conduct of science–policy interfaces between scientists and policymakers for addressing day-to-day environmental problems in the southeastern Spanish drylands. A knowledge brokering approach based on six consecutive workshops was used to facilitate mutual understanding and trust between scientists and policymakers. Water policy and biodiversity loss were identified as major environmental concerns in the region, and 12 final environmental problems were agreed as priorities. A graphical tool was used for diagnosing each environmental problem according to the available scientific knowledge, the current regulatory capacity of administrations, and the level of public engagement necessary for addressing the problem. The use of the graphical tool also allowed for (a) the clarification of roles involved in problem solving, and (b) the promotion of a culture of shared responsibility for the implementation of management actions based on collaborative work. We discuss lessons learned and propose recommendations for future experiences.

[1]  W. Clark,et al.  Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  C. Mbizvo,et al.  Bridging the science–policy interface: A new era for South African research and the role of knowledge brokering , 2010 .

[3]  Carel Dieperink,et al.  Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action , 2012 .

[4]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis , 1995 .

[5]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research , 2010 .

[6]  Anita Engels,et al.  The Science-Policy Interface , 2005 .

[7]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Planetary Opportunities: A Social Contract for Global Change Science to Contribute to a Sustainable Future , 2012 .

[8]  Marc Hockings,et al.  Managers consider multiple lines of evidence important for biodiversity management decisions. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  Marina García-Llorente,et al.  From supply to social demand: a landscape-scale analysis of the water regulation service , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[10]  Simo Sarkki,et al.  Improving the science-policy dialogue to meet the challenges of biodiversity conservation: having conversations rather than talking at one-another , 2014, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[11]  Other Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of The Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy (Water Framework Directive) , 2000 .

[12]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Linking Knowledge and Action for Sustainable Development , 2006 .

[13]  Carlos Montes,et al.  Incorporating the Social–Ecological Approach in Protected Areas in the Anthropocene , 2014 .

[14]  F. Médail,et al.  Biodiversity Hotspots in the Mediterranean Basin: Setting Global Conservation Priorities , 1999 .

[15]  Jurian Edelenbos,et al.  Co-producing knowledge: joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects , 2011 .

[16]  A. Pullin,et al.  Support for decision making in conservation practice: an evidence-based approach , 2003 .

[17]  I. Otto,et al.  Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change , 2013 .

[18]  Gerben Janse,et al.  Communication between forest scientists and forest policy-makers in Europe — A survey on both sides of the science/policy interface , 2008 .

[19]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Ecosystem service trade-offs from supply to social demand: A landscape-scale spatial analysis , 2014 .

[20]  J. Tàbara,et al.  Coupling Human Information and Knowledge Systems with social-ecological systems change: Reframing research, education, and policy for sustainability , 2013 .

[21]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Incorporating ecosystem services into ecosystem-based management to deal with complexity: a participative mental model approach , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[22]  Karl A. Schaefer,et al.  From Science Communication to Knowledge Brokering: the Shift from ‘Science Push’ to ‘Policy Pull’ , 2008 .

[23]  William Snyder,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[24]  D. Roux,et al.  Bridging the Science-Management Divide: Moving from Unidirectional Knowledge Transfer to Knowledge Interfacing and Sharing , 2006 .

[25]  Sybille van den Hove,et al.  A Rationale for Science-Policy Interfaces , 2007 .

[26]  A. Champigneulle,et al.  Developing collaborative research to improve effectiveness in biodiversity conservation practice , 2012 .

[27]  M. Rudd,et al.  How Research‐Prioritization Exercises Affect Conservation Policy , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[28]  C. Ansell,et al.  Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[29]  B. Bryan,et al.  Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services , 2009 .