Transcriptional control: rheostat converted to on/off switch.

Individual cells translate concentration gradients of extracellular factors into all-or-none threshold responses leading to discrete patterns of gene expression. Signaling cascades account for some but not all such threshold responses, suggesting the existence of additional mechanisms. Here we show that all-or-none responses can be generated at a transcriptional level. A graded rheostat mechanism obtained when either transactivators or transrepressors are present is converted to an on/off switch when these factors compete for the same DNA regulatory element. Hill coefficients of dose-response curves confirm that the synergistic responses generated by each factor alone are additive, obviating the need for feedback loops. We postulate that regulatory networks of competing transcription factors prevalent in cells and organisms are crucial for establishing true molecular on/off switches.

[1]  M. Levine,et al.  Regulation of a segmentation stripe by overlapping activators and repressors in the Drosophila embryo. , 1991, Science.

[2]  M. Levine,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of a pair-rule stripe in Drosophila. , 1991, Genes & development.

[3]  D. Kalderon,et al.  Hedgehog stimulates maturation of Cubitus interruptus into a labile transcriptional activator , 1998, Nature.

[4]  H. Blau,et al.  Graded transcriptional response to different concentrations of a single transactivator. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  B. Malissen,et al.  Visualizing interleukin 2 gene expression at the single cell level , 1989, European journal of immunology.

[6]  G. Nolan,et al.  Single cell assay of a transcription factor reveals a threshold in transcription activated by signals emanating from the T-cell antigen receptor. , 1990, Genes & development.

[7]  M. Levine,et al.  Regulation of even‐skipped stripe 2 in the Drosophila embryo. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[8]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Cells’ Perception of Position in a Concentration Gradient , 1998, Cell.

[9]  M. Levine,et al.  An anteroposterior Dorsal gradient in the Drosophila embryo. , 1997, Genes & development.

[10]  Michael Carey,et al.  A mechanism for synergistic activation of a mammalian gene by GAL4 derivatives , 1990, Nature.

[11]  R. Eisenman,et al.  Mad proteins contain a dominant transcription repression domain , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[12]  H. Blau,et al.  Tetracycline-regulatable factors with distinct dimerization domains allow reversible growth inhibition by p16 , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[13]  E. Olson,et al.  MyoR: a muscle-restricted basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor that antagonizes the actions of MyoD. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Michael Carey,et al.  How different eukaryotic transcriptional activators can cooperate promiscuously , 1990, Nature.

[15]  M. Gossen,et al.  Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  D. Tzamarias,et al.  The Tup1-Cyc8 Protein Complex Can Shift from a Transcriptional Co-repressor to a Transcriptional Co-activator* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  M. Levine,et al.  The eve stripe 2 enhancer employs multiple modes of transcriptional synergy. , 1996, Development.

[18]  J E Ferrell,et al.  How responses get more switch-like as you move down a protein kinase cascade. , 1997, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[19]  B N Kholodenko,et al.  Why do protein kinase cascades have more than one level? , 1997, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[20]  C. Glass,et al.  Signal-specific co-activator domain requirements for Pit-1 activation , 1998, Nature.

[21]  M. Levine,et al.  Transcriptional repression in development. , 1996, Current opinion in cell biology.

[22]  N. Dyson.  The regulation of E2F by pRB-family proteins. , 1998, Genes & development.

[23]  S. F. Konieczny,et al.  The basic helix–loop–helix transcription factor Mist1 functions as a transcriptional repressor of MyoD , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[24]  R. Eisenman,et al.  Mad: A heterodimeric partner for Max that antagonizes Myc transcriptional activity , 1993, Cell.

[25]  Jun Ma,et al.  An HMG-like protein that can switch a transcriptional activator to a repressor , 1994, Nature.

[26]  K. Umesono,et al.  The nuclear receptor superfamily: The second decade , 1995, Cell.

[27]  U. Deuschle,et al.  Tetracycline-reversible silencing of eukaryotic promoters , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[28]  Z. Paroush,et al.  Conversion of dorsal from an activator to a repressor by the global corepressor Groucho. , 1997, Genes & development.

[29]  M. Gossen,et al.  Transcriptional activation by tetracyclines in mammalian cells. , 1995, Science.

[30]  N. Papalopulu,et al.  XBF-1, a winged helix transcription factor with dual activity, has a role in positioning neurogenesis in Xenopus competent ectoderm. , 1998, Development.

[31]  E. Wieschaus,et al.  The Drosophila Gene brinker Reveals a Novel Mechanism of Dpp Target Gene Regulation , 1999, Cell.

[32]  N. Shastri,et al.  Measurement of ligand-induced activation in single viable T cells using the lacZ reporter gene. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Hans Clevers,et al.  The Xenopus Wnt effector XTcf-3 interacts with Groucho-related transcriptional repressors , 1998, Nature.

[34]  M. Ko,et al.  The dose dependence of glucocorticoid‐inducible gene expression results from changes in the number of transcriptionally active templates. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[35]  J E Ferrell,et al.  The biochemical basis of an all-or-none cell fate switch in Xenopus oocytes. , 1998, Science.