The uptake of applied ecology

We asked 229 authors who have published recently in the Journal of Applied Ecology (1999–2001) whether their papers made management or policy recommendations and whether they had evidence of consequent uptake.2A total of 108 respondents working in the UK (34%), Europe (30%), the Americas (12%), Australasia (11%), Asia (7%) and Africa (6%) reported on 110 papers. They represented agro-ecosystems (35%), temperate forests or woodlands (16%), savanna, grass or arid lands (11%), rivers or wetlands (10%), estuaries or marine systems (7%) and tropical forests (5%). The major organisms were invertebrates (27%), birds (24%), mammals (21%) and higher plants (21%). Topics apparently under-represented in recent coverage include ecosystem science, urban areas, soils, mountain systems, fish, amphibians and lower organisms such as algae.3Almost all papers (99%) carried recommendations and for 57% there was evidence of uptake in the broad categories of ‘environmental management or models’, ‘information, training and education’ and ‘monitoring and assessment’. Most uptake involved large geographical scales through habitat or species management plans (32% of cases), effects on reserve design or designation (6%), and effects on agri-environmental policy (5%). The development of further research (11%), the communication of methods to other ecologists (9%), the dissemination of recommendations to practitioners or agencies (7%), and uptake in training or education (5%) were important uses of information.4Prestige from publication in the Journal of Applied Ecology aided several authors in convincing end-users of research value. User involvement in research as participants or funders was widespread (> 42% of papers), a fact which almost certainly promotes uptake along with the parallel dissemination of management messages. We view applied issues as an important interface between end-users and ecologists of value to ‘both’ communities but suggest that improved communication will further benefit the sponsorship and application of ecological science.5The major reason offered for lack of uptake was that it was still too soon after publication (21% of respondents). Costs, difficulty of implementation, the scale of the problem, and ‘challenges to existing thinking’ each figured in more than one response.6For some respondents, papers were led by curiosity rather than the need for direct application. Several authors published in the Journal to share ideas internationally, or said that recommendations were general, conceptual or long-term rather than specific. The editors of the Journal of Applied Ecology recognize the seminal importance of contributions that affect policy incrementally and conceptually as much as those with specific application.7These data provide evidence that ecological science is aiding environmental management and policy across a wide range of regions, ecosystems and types of organisms; rather than merely detecting problems, applied ecology is offering solutions both directly and more diffusely through conceptual advance. We invite the user community to offer their own perspectives about the value of research-led publications such as this Journal, about how links between researchers and users might be strengthened, and about how the uptake of applied ecology might be further advanced.

[1]  Andrew R. Watkinson,et al.  Large‐scale ecology and hydrology: an introductory perspective from the editors of the Journal of Applied Ecology , 2000 .

[2]  J. Butterfield.  Changes in decomposition rates and Collembola densities during the forestry cycle in conifer plantations , 1999 .

[3]  A. Hester,et al.  Predicting spatial variation in heather utilization by sheep and red deer within heather/grass mosaics , 2000 .

[4]  J. Vickery,et al.  The relative abundance of birds on set-aside and neighbouring fields in summer , 2000 .

[5]  P. Clergeau,et al.  Are urban bird communities influenced by the bird diversity of adjacent landscapes , 2001 .

[6]  R. Wagner,et al.  Clearcutting and burning of northern spruce‐fir forests: implications for small mammal communities , 1999 .

[7]  A. Young,et al.  Simulating the long-term dynamics of slug populations: a process-based modelling approach for pest control , 2001 .

[8]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Relationships between biomass and plant species richness in arid-zone grazing lands , 2001 .

[9]  G. Singleton,et al.  Rate of increase as a function of rainfall for house mouse Mus domesticus populations in a cereal-growing region in southern Australia , 1999 .

[10]  S. Baillie,et al.  The importance of variation in the breeding performance of seed‐eating birds in determining their population trends on farmland , 2000 .

[11]  J. Beukema,et al.  An estimate of the sustainable rate of shell extraction from the Dutch Wadden Sea , 1999 .

[12]  R. Hoare,et al.  Determinants of human–elephant conflict in a land‐use mosaic , 1999 .

[13]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Optimal release strategies for biological control agents: an application of stochastic dynamic programming to population management , 2000 .

[14]  P. Donald,et al.  Habitat use and diet of skylarks Alauda arvensis wintering on lowland farmland in southern Britain , 2001 .

[15]  Henrik Brøseth,et al.  Hunting effort and game vulnerability studies on a small scale: a new technique combining radio‐telemetry, GPS and GIS , 2000 .

[16]  S. Redpath,et al.  Meadow pipits, red grouse and the habitat characteristics of managed grouse moors , 2001 .

[17]  Susan M. Galatowitsch,et al.  Effects of water regime and competition on the establishment of a native sedge in restored wetlands , 2000 .

[18]  A. Sheppard,et al.  The impact of a root-crown weevil and pasture competition on the winter annual Echium plantagineum. , 2001 .

[19]  Peter W. W. Lurz,et al.  Modelling the spatial dynamics of parapoxvirus disease in red and grey squirrels: a possible cause of the decline in the red squirrel in the UK? , 2000 .

[20]  J. Holloway,et al.  Dung beetles as indicators of change in the forests of northern Borneo , 2001 .

[21]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Conservation in Practice: Overcoming Obstacles to Implementation , 1999 .

[22]  P. Migot,et al.  Predation on livestock by an expanding reintroduced lynx population: long‐term trend and spatial variability , 2001 .

[23]  A. Watkinson,et al.  Communicating the value of ecology , 1999 .

[24]  T. O’Connor,et al.  Effect of stocking rate and rainfall on rangeland dynamics and cattle performance in a semi‐arid savanna, South Africa , 2000 .

[25]  M. Schneider.  Habitat loss, fragmentation and predator impact: spatial implications for prey conservation , 2001 .

[26]  R. Fensham,et al.  Temporal and spatial patterns in drought-related tree dieback in Australian savanna , 1999 .

[27]  J. Clobert,et al.  Demography and the decline of the grey partridge Perdix perdix in France , 2000 .

[28]  M. Hill,et al.  Extending Ellenberg's indicator values to a new area: an algorithmic approach , 2000 .

[29]  M. Anciães,et al.  The effects of fragmentation on fluctuating asymmetry in passerine birds of Brazilian tropical forests , 2000 .

[30]  Niall Moore,et al.  Breeding success and causes of breeding failure of curlew Numenius arquata in Northern Ireland , 1999 .

[31]  Colin J. McClean,et al.  Between‐observer variation in the application of a standard method of habitat mapping by environmental consultants in the UK , 1999 .

[32]  S. D. Langton,et al.  Do wood-pigeons avoid pesticide-treated cereal seed? , 1999 .

[33]  H. Berg.  The influence of the rice bug Leptocorisa oratorius on rice yield , 2000 .

[34]  J. D. Thomas.  Particle selection by snail hosts of human schistosomes in relation to their survival strategies and possible control by 'environmental antibodies' , 2001 .

[35]  L. Björn,et al.  Effects of ultraviolet-B radiation and pH on early development of the moor frog Rana arvalis , 2001 .

[36]  Stéphanie Manel,et al.  Testing large-scale hypotheses using surveys: the effects of land use on the habitats, invertebrates and birds of Himalayan rivers , 2000 .

[37]  P. Edwards,et al.  Enhancing insect diversity in agricultural grasslands: the roles of management and landscape structure , 2001 .

[38]  D. Kleijn,et al.  Factors affecting the species composition of arable field boundary vegetation , 2000 .

[39]  B. Schmid,et al.  The influence of management regime and altitude on the population structure of Succisapratensis: implications for vegetation monitoring , 2001 .

[40]  D. Flaspohler,et al.  Application of Conservation Biology Research to Management , 2000, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[41]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  The effects of disturbance on habitat use by black‐tailed godwits Limosa limosa , 2001 .

[42]  Jean-Louis Martin,et al.  The benefits of extensive agriculture to birds: the case of the little bustard , 2001 .

[43]  J. Humphrey,et al.  Effects of late summer cattle grazing on the diversity of riparian pasture vegetation in an upland conifer forest , 2000 .

[44]  J. Kollmann,et al.  Genetic introgression from distant provenances reduces fitness in local weed populations , 2000 .

[45]  S. Langton,et al.  Habitat models of bird species' distribution: an aid to the management of coastal grazing marshes. , 2000 .

[46]  David J. Spurgeon,et al.  Seasonal variation in the abundance, biomass and biodiversity of earthworms in soils contaminated with metal emissions from a primary smelting works , 1999 .

[47]  M. Whittingham,et al.  Time budgets and foraging of breeding golden plover Pluvialis apricaria. , 2000 .

[48]  D. Fisher.  Effects of vegetation structure, food and shelter on the home range and habitat use of an endangered wallaby , 2000 .

[49]  J. Axelsen,et al.  The value of Collembola from agricultural soils as food for a generalist predator , 2000 .

[50]  J. J. Howard,et al.  The seasonal abundance of blowflies infesting drying fish in south‐west India , 2001 .

[51]  J. Balbontín,et al.  Nesting habitat selection by booted eagles Hieraaetus pennatus and implications for management , 2000 .

[52]  A. Robertson,et al.  The responses of floodplain primary production to flood frequency and timing , 2001 .